Started By
Message

re: Y’all want a little preview of Comey’s motion to dismiss?

Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:55 am to
Posted by rattlebucket
SELA
Member since Feb 2009
12860 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:55 am to
Thats fine. Get him on the treason
Posted by Captain Rumbeard
Member since Jan 2014
7179 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:56 am to
So you think a grand jury indicted him for some shells?
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85685 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:58 am to
Is there something else in the indictment we’ve all been missing?
Posted by VoxDawg
Glory, Glory
Member since Sep 2012
77723 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:05 am to
quote:

it’s the only thing he’s indicted for right now.

It's the predicate for the indictment, but by no means the only activity they're considering under the charges.

Watch the embedded video from Blanche himself:

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


quote:

Interesting exchange just now at the DOJ press conference about the James Comey indictments for his “86-47” post last year.

AG Todd Blanche was pretty tight lipped about the evidence they have on Comey, but he said that they are looking at devices and there was a communication that was sent in this case.

“There’s a communication that was sent allegedly in this case, and so that means that we have to look at devices…”

Is he referring to the Instagram post itself? It feels like more than that because it doesn’t seem like a grand jury would indict him for JUST the Instagram post. Plus, Blanche seems to reference that they have more evidence later in this clip:

“So whether there is a defense as you just described? Maybe… but the government will have evidence. I am not gonna talk about the evidence that we have.”

What do they have on Comey?

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:07 am to
quote:

So you think a grand jury indicted him for some shells?


Did you read the indictment?

What else do you think they indicted him for?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
477219 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:09 am to
quote:

It's the predicate for the indictment, but by no means the only activity they're considering under the charges.


The trial is set for July 15

I doubt there is any time for a superseding indictment

quote:

Watch the embedded video from Blanche himself:

Blanche says a lot of wrong stuff, like his SPLC comments he had to walk back in embarrassing fashion lately.

He's a carnival barker.
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
85685 posts
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:16 am to
Oh gosh, we’re doing this again?
Posted by dafif
Member since Jan 2019
8440 posts
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:42 am to
quote:

Would it be an actionable crime if Comey or anyone else posted “Kill Trump” on social media?



quote:

Under 18 U.S.C. § 871, it is a federal crime to make any threat to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm on the President.
This applies even if:

The statement is made online

You didn’t “mean it”

You were joking, venting, or being sarcastic

You have no ability or intention to carry it out

Courts look at whether a reasonable person would interpret the statement as a true threat, not whether you personally intended harm.
quote:

Would it be an actionable crime if Comey or anyone else posted “Kill Trump” on social media?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram