- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Y’all want a little preview of Comey’s motion to dismiss?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:55 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:55 am to boosiebadazz
Thats fine. Get him on the treason
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:56 am to boosiebadazz
So you think a grand jury indicted him for some shells?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 7:58 am to Captain Rumbeard
Is there something else in the indictment we’ve all been missing?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:05 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
it’s the only thing he’s indicted for right now.
It's the predicate for the indictment, but by no means the only activity they're considering under the charges.
Watch the embedded video from Blanche himself:
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
Interesting exchange just now at the DOJ press conference about the James Comey indictments for his “86-47” post last year.
AG Todd Blanche was pretty tight lipped about the evidence they have on Comey, but he said that they are looking at devices and there was a communication that was sent in this case.
“There’s a communication that was sent allegedly in this case, and so that means that we have to look at devices…”
Is he referring to the Instagram post itself? It feels like more than that because it doesn’t seem like a grand jury would indict him for JUST the Instagram post. Plus, Blanche seems to reference that they have more evidence later in this clip:
“So whether there is a defense as you just described? Maybe… but the government will have evidence. I am not gonna talk about the evidence that we have.”
What do they have on Comey?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:07 am to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
So you think a grand jury indicted him for some shells?
Did you read the indictment?
What else do you think they indicted him for?
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:09 am to VoxDawg
quote:
It's the predicate for the indictment, but by no means the only activity they're considering under the charges.
The trial is set for July 15
I doubt there is any time for a superseding indictment
quote:
Watch the embedded video from Blanche himself:
Blanche says a lot of wrong stuff, like his SPLC comments he had to walk back in embarrassing fashion lately.
He's a carnival barker.
Posted on 5/13/26 at 8:16 am to VoxDawg
Oh gosh, we’re doing this again?
Posted on 5/17/26 at 7:42 am to ifyoubuildit
quote:
Would it be an actionable crime if Comey or anyone else posted “Kill Trump” on social media?
quote:
Under 18 U.S.C. § 871, it is a federal crime to make any threat to kill, kidnap, or inflict bodily harm on the President.
This applies even if:
The statement is made online
You didn’t “mean it”
You were joking, venting, or being sarcastic
You have no ability or intention to carry it out
Courts look at whether a reasonable person would interpret the statement as a true threat, not whether you personally intended harm.
quote:
Would it be an actionable crime if Comey or anyone else posted “Kill Trump” on social media?
Popular
Back to top

0








