- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:27 pm to EF Hutton
I carry three things in my truck.
Part of an old fishing rod. The handle.
A deer skinning knife
My gun
Continuum?
Part of an old fishing rod. The handle.
A deer skinning knife
My gun
Continuum?
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:32 pm to EF Hutton
I think she should have asked her husband to back out of the parking spot and then pull ahead about 50 yards while holding the others at bay since she already drew Her firearm. Then calmly walk to the vehicle while still pointing her gun at the crowd. Get in and hit the gas at that point. Husband getting out cost him his job.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:33 pm to EF Hutton
That applies to people resisting.
If I’m under assault or believe my life is in danger that can’t be the same as people resisting.
I get what you are saying though.
If I’m under assault or believe my life is in danger that can’t be the same as people resisting.
I get what you are saying though.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:43 pm to roadGator
Yeah its written as law enf training, but it follows the reasonable man test as to justification, so it will apply to a civilian in a defense situation.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:44 pm to EF Hutton
But isn’t it written to address people resisting lawful orders?
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:44 pm to SidewalkTiger
What makes this worse to me is it validates the trash that instigated this shite. What the hell is to stop them from doing this and then some next time?
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:47 pm to roadGator
Also, i know how words are twisted, so i would prepare a written statement for the police on scene. Troopers often try to confuse you by repeating back what you said, often twisting the meaning.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:51 pm to roadGator
quote:
But isn’t it written ......
Yes but it is exactly how a court will look at it. Attorneys are aware of the force continum. The main key is Would a reasonable person
( typical upstanding citizen ) have been in fear under those same circumstances?
The Jurors !!!
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:53 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
quote:
What makes this worse to me is it validates the trash that instigated this shite. What the hell is to stop them from doing this and then some next time?
Yeah. Its the new normal. Their Trainers KNOW what they are doing. They know the law. They train thugs.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:53 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
(no message)
This post was edited on 7/3/20 at 6:53 am
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:58 pm to ShortyRob
quote:
She should have just killed them. They all had it coming anyways
And she’d be in jail. In fact, had that situation escalated to the black family attacking her and she shot and killed one of them, she would almost certainly be convicted. Reason? They would argue that she had an opportunity to deescalate the situation by apologizing, but instead refused, knowing she could use force if necessary. There have been numerous examples of this in recent years and current climate is making it worse.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 8:58 pm to MickeyLikesDags21
You won’t be using verbal commands or hands on such as pressure points. But you come into play beginning with intermediate weapons, up to deadly force.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 9:04 pm to EF Hutton
Show the jury videos of people being pulled from their cars and assaulted.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 9:08 pm to S1C EM
quote:
They would argue that she had an opportunity to deescalate the situation by apologizing
The black woman was not going to be tempered. She was irrationally angry.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 9:14 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
The black woman was not going to be tempered. She was irrationally angry.
Oh, you’re absolutely right. They usually are. But this is the angle that would be taken. There is case law to support it.
Posted on 7/2/20 at 9:17 pm to S1C EM
Google “Michael Dunn Jordan Davis” if you want an example.
Posted on 7/3/20 at 1:48 am to SidewalkTiger
quote:
exchange quickly escalates from an argument about an apology into accusations of racism,
So, can someone just tell me why she wanted an apology? I don't want to watch the video.
This post was edited on 7/3/20 at 1:48 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News