- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Woman paid 200k to accuse Trump
Posted on 12/12/17 at 4:04 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 4:04 am
Per Bill O'Reilly.... and it is on tape.
LINK
He is asking the owner of the tapes to turn them over to Attorney.
LINK
He is asking the owner of the tapes to turn them over to Attorney.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 4:10 am to Jjdoc
$200K? Someone did not read the Art of the Deal. Way overpaid.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 4:11 am to PurpleandGold Motown
Introducing...Roy Moore, your next Senator from the state of Alabama!
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 4:12 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 4:20 am to Jjdoc
From the O'Reilly interview it sounds like Trump knows about it but doesn't want it released yet.
He wants to give the geniuses in the media and DC enough rope to hang themselves and drain the swamp a little more. Save the tape for if/when it is actually needed.
This really is the best timeline.
He wants to give the geniuses in the media and DC enough rope to hang themselves and drain the swamp a little more. Save the tape for if/when it is actually needed.
This really is the best timeline.
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 4:22 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:26 am to Jjdoc
Those were some homely bitches they drug out. You don’t stick a billion dollar dick in $0.75 pussy. At least find some talent.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:29 am to Jjdoc
Wouldn't shock me in this political environment.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:45 am to Jjdoc
Why would an unemployed sexual predator who isnt connected to these claims have special info about some secret tapes?
Worth noting that I think these accusations sound like bullshite.
Worth noting that I think these accusations sound like bullshite.
This post was edited on 12/12/17 at 5:47 am
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:49 am to DEG
quote:
Why would an unemployed sexual predator that isnt connected to these claims have special info about some secret tapes?
Because despite all of that, the man still has connections everywhere. He hasn’t been off the air that long. He was definitely on the air when the Trump accuser stories started popping up. Makes perfect sense that someone might have tipped him off to their existence during that time frame.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:56 am to Blizzard of Chizz
quote:
Makes perfect sense that someone might have tipped him off to their existence during that time frame.
Not really. It would make more sense to tip someone off who has credibility and a bonafide show as a forum to leak this.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 5:57 am to Jjdoc
Fusion GPS paid $9- $12 million for a book report about peeing hookers.
Is it that big of a stretch for me to believe that they paid 15 washed up women $3 Million bucks total to make an unprovable allegation in a press confernce.
After receiving money before the election, from the $1 Billion Hillary raised - neither the DNC, George Soros or Fusion GPS has to even pay them. The homliest librarian in her knitting circle gets 15 minutes of fame and/or she can’t back out of her absurd airplane fantasy now. There’s only a consequence if The Three Stoogettes from yesterday backtrack on their pre-election horse shite. There’s certainly no legal consequence for lying about a public figure in a press conference.
Is it that big of a stretch for me to believe that they paid 15 washed up women $3 Million bucks total to make an unprovable allegation in a press confernce.
After receiving money before the election, from the $1 Billion Hillary raised - neither the DNC, George Soros or Fusion GPS has to even pay them. The homliest librarian in her knitting circle gets 15 minutes of fame and/or she can’t back out of her absurd airplane fantasy now. There’s only a consequence if The Three Stoogettes from yesterday backtrack on their pre-election horse shite. There’s certainly no legal consequence for lying about a public figure in a press conference.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 6:02 am to DEG
Well since you think so we will just stop talking about it because you have always been keen aboutvall of CNN/ABC/wapo lies
Posted on 12/12/17 at 6:31 am to DEG
quote:
Worth noting that I think these accusations sound like bullshite.
Like the sexual harassment accusations dicksmokers in your party are trying to push?
MAGA
Posted on 12/12/17 at 6:42 am to DEG
quote:
Not really. It would make more sense to tip someone off who has credibility and a bonafide show as a forum to leak this.
Did you not read what I said? The O’Reilly Factor was the highest rated news show on cable television and it was on the air when the allegations first surfaced. It would be perfectly logical that someone gave him the info back in the fall of 2016. You’re listening to that clip and trying to figure out why anyone would recently give him that info (recently = anytime after he was fired) when in reality he’s probably had it for almost a year and a half now.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:29 am to Blizzard of Chizz
I so agree with you. He has the contacts to wind up with this info.
Plus, it’s completely believable to me that it’s on tape. $200k in hush money doesn’t work unless there’s proof of the transaction.
I’d be willing to bet all these women (none of whom Trump supervised at work, or even knew), especially the homely airplane lady are on tape during their “atty client” “privileged” conversations with Gloria Allred, or whatever political hack atty “represents” them. Honestly. Why do you need an attorney to make a statement in a press conference? There’s no legal proceeding. This is just bullshite about an alleged, and unprovable tort/crime that is beyond the statute of limitations. These “attorneys” are not attorneys. They are publicists.
The only legal process that these assholes planned to upset is an election.
It is thoroughly disgusting to me that these people have set back women’s credibility on such personal issues by this political weaponization of sex. Democrats would be ashamed if they had any moral compass at all.
Plus, it’s completely believable to me that it’s on tape. $200k in hush money doesn’t work unless there’s proof of the transaction.
I’d be willing to bet all these women (none of whom Trump supervised at work, or even knew), especially the homely airplane lady are on tape during their “atty client” “privileged” conversations with Gloria Allred, or whatever political hack atty “represents” them. Honestly. Why do you need an attorney to make a statement in a press conference? There’s no legal proceeding. This is just bullshite about an alleged, and unprovable tort/crime that is beyond the statute of limitations. These “attorneys” are not attorneys. They are publicists.
The only legal process that these assholes planned to upset is an election.
It is thoroughly disgusting to me that these people have set back women’s credibility on such personal issues by this political weaponization of sex. Democrats would be ashamed if they had any moral compass at all.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:30 am to Jjdoc
quote:
Per Bill O'Reilly
quote:
thegatewaypundit
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:37 am to Blizzard of Chizz
I read every word, and still disagree with your hypothesis. If Oreilly knew about these tapes prior to the election why is he just now speaking out about them?
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:44 am to DEG
See my post above.
I would bet this tape was made by an attorney, paid by Trump’s political opponents. Conversations btwn attorneys and their clients are shielded from any kind of disclosure.
They send in a “lawyer” to approach the “victim” and then the “lawyer” represents the “victim”’ in her media interviews. The “lawyer” never has to turn over the tape of the convo with his “client”. And in fact the law in every state prevents the “lawyer” from turning it over.
I would bet this tape was made by an attorney, paid by Trump’s political opponents. Conversations btwn attorneys and their clients are shielded from any kind of disclosure.
They send in a “lawyer” to approach the “victim” and then the “lawyer” represents the “victim”’ in her media interviews. The “lawyer” never has to turn over the tape of the convo with his “client”. And in fact the law in every state prevents the “lawyer” from turning it over.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:45 am to DEG
Because the Trump accusers are suddenly back in the news just like many suspected they would be when the Moore and Franken stories broke.
Posted on 12/12/17 at 7:55 am to Draconian Sanctions
It takes an impressive lack of awareness to laugh about the gateway pundit given the state of news in this country.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News