- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: William Barr Will Decide if Donald Trump can Suspend Election
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:11 am to BoarEd
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:11 am to BoarEd
No he can't reschedule an election even if it makes sense because of the virus thing. Now a national emergency such as an attack there is some process. Why would he want to and for what purpose? This is all politics. OTOH there is damn good reason for Republicans to throw shade on the mail in thing because of the corruption, vote harvesting, etc. Why do you think the democrats are hot to do that. Because it opens the door for cheating.
1
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:12 am to cajunangelle
quote:
redacted because OP knows Trump will suspend the election.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 12:13 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:12 am to Mickey Goldmill
Yup just like muh russia, muh taxes, muh impeachment, muh retweets, muh ukraine, muh grab her by the puss
At some point it might happen for you
At some point it might happen for you
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:13 am to SDVTiger
I resigned to the fact that trump won’t lose a long time ago Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:15 am to jimdog
quote:
OTOH there is damn good reason for Republicans to throw shade on the mail in thing because of the corruption, vote harvesting, etc.
I believe that's the most likely answer to the question of why would Trump want to do this. Perhaps if it appears as if the nationwide vote by mail free for all is going to be a reality, this would be an effort to avert that, at least temporarily. Say perhaps if there's more time needed in court. Just spitballing.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:16 am to Mickey Goldmill
At least you’re man enough to admit it unlike the few around here that live in a fantasy world
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:24 am to Mickey Goldmill
I don’t see a path for a national mail in vote getting any traction
Way too late in the game for that
If states want to do it they can, provided their processes meet the requirements
The examples used thus far have been a disaster, as it stands we probably won’t have a winner Nov 4th IMHO
Way too late in the game for that
If states want to do it they can, provided their processes meet the requirements
The examples used thus far have been a disaster, as it stands we probably won’t have a winner Nov 4th IMHO
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:26 am to supatigah
I agree. The end result will likely be less than 10 states doing all mail in voting, and half of those already do it mostly mail in voting so they should be able to handle it better.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:26 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The hell? Based on what? How would a court proceeding on a injunction regarding the election land anyone in jail?
Because in order to justify it he would have to show there is a plot to rig the election. Which we all know is what is happening. And they used a biological attack as the pretense to rig the election. Which gives him enormous power.
In short, an injunction would allow him to present evidence before the court that we are at literal war with elements within our own Government gone rogue.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:32 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
The end result will likely be less than 10 states doing all mail in voting, and half of those already do it mostly mail in voting so they should be able to handle it better.
So when was the last time the left handled anything better?
Peaceful protests in Portland or Seattle
Obama care
muh peach mint
Which one was it?
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:36 am to BoarEd
quote:
Because in order to justify it he would have to show there is a plot to rig the election. Which we all know is what is happening. And they used a biological attack as the pretense to rig the election. Which gives him enormous power.
So why not do it? We’re only 3 months away, it would garner wall to wall coverage and both of those cases could be laid out in black and white. Why not lay the hammer home about the corruption?
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:36 am to BoarEd
quote:
Because in order to justify it he would have to show there is a plot to rig the election. Which we all know is what is happening. And they used a biological attack as the pretense to rig the election. Which gives him enormous power.
In short, an injunction would allow him to present evidence before the court that we are at literal war with elements within our own Government gone rogue.
This is why people make fun of you on here.
But what the hell, I’ll play along. First, the injunction proceeding would be solely based on whether he has the power to suspend the election. It’s a constitutional question. That’s it. Second, what evidence do you think exists for his big reveal that lands fauci and company in jail?
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:40 am to Mickey Goldmill
Correct
Those would be multiple different cases, conspiracy is difficult to prove without a smoking gun and could take months if it ever got to that
Those would be multiple different cases, conspiracy is difficult to prove without a smoking gun and could take months if it ever got to that
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:41 am to BoarEd
Additionally, if he had a clear cut and dry case like this, he is just a culpable for not bringing these people to justice. You can’t withhold information like that for some kind of gotcha and then let everyone run free while people are losing their jobs and livelihoods.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 12:44 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
But what the hell, I’ll play along. First, the injunction proceeding would be solely based on whether he has the power to suspend the election. It’s a constitutional question. That’s it.
I think you are incorrect here due to the nature of the circumstances surrounding the various different emergency declarations we are under. We are currently under three different Covid related emergency declarations. If it is found that this thing was a deliberate biological attack (it was and we all damn well know it), we are in a state of war (we are). And if the Democrats are complicit in this (they are), they are enemy combatants.
Their coup attempt has gone a step too far.
You should look into POTUS' powers in the event of a biological attack. This is absolutely a question for Bill Barr because the instigators of this entire thing (the virus) are his political opponents.
He could, in court, tie this to the reasoning for suspending the elections and it would be granted. Because it is all true.
quote:
This is why people make fun of you on here.
No fricks given. For awhile tonight I had the top three trending threads on this board. You can kiss my arse.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 12:47 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 1:01 am to BoarEd
quote:
If it is found that this thing was a deliberate biological attack (it was and we all damn well know it)
Has nothing to do with an injunction regarding the election.
quote:
we are in a state of war (we are)
With who? China? And being at war hasn’t stopped an election before.
quote:
And if the Democrats are complicit in this (they are), they are enemy combatants.
Has nothing to do with an injunction regarding the election. You also ignored the evidence part of my question. You think this will be proven in court before November? I’d love to know how.
quote:
You should look into POTUS' powers in the event of a biological attack. This is absolutely a question for Bill Barr because the instigators of this entire thing (the virus) are his political opponents.
Did you forget the virus is worldwide and not just in our country? Lockdowns have happened worldwide, not just in our country.
quote:
No fricks given. For awhile tonight I had the top three trending threads on this board. You can kiss my arse.
You sure do care a lot about how popular your threads are
Posted on 7/31/20 at 1:05 am to BoarEd
I can see where you could come to this conclusion; but as I was trying to tell you before it ain't happenin.
If you require a guideline.
Go here.
He called it.
He gives hope Trump will win
Don't discount IW's they were used as a platform at the time.
If you require a guideline.
Go here.
He called it.
He gives hope Trump will win
Don't discount IW's they were used as a platform at the time.
This post was edited on 7/31/20 at 1:07 am
Posted on 7/31/20 at 1:06 am to Mickey Goldmill
His premise is we are at war with the Democratic Party and they’re in bed with China and attempting to overthrow the election.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 1:07 am to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
You sure do care a lot about how popular your threads are
You're the one that tried to belittle my position by saying people make fun of me. So what? Therefore you're right?
Motherfricker, you were pushing the idea that Donald Trump was a Russian Agent. Gtfo with this shite.
Posted on 7/31/20 at 1:08 am to lsuguy84
quote:we are and they are.
His premise is we are at war with the Democratic Party and they’re in bed with China and attempting to overthrow the election.
Page 6 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News