- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Will Don Jr be indicted?
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:53 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:53 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
Napolitano has been wrong on nearly every occasion predicting this stuff.
He has no shame- as long as he is getting that paycheck from FOX. He's the judicial bloviator of that channel. Gregg Jarrett on FOX puts Nap to shame in re judicial matters.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:53 am to 995webmaster
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:55 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Oh Doc. When will you learn?
It's ok, Bonds. He's not that bright and could very well be wrong about this.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 9:57 am to YankeeBama
quote:
Will Don Jr be indicted?
Maybe.
Maybe not.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:08 am to TigerDoc
quote:
It's ok, Bonds. He's not that bright and could very well be wrong about this.
Your post claims the sources said he expected to be indicted any day....a month ago. I hate to think the reporter at Vanity Fair doesn’t have his finger on the pulse of federal law goings on.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:14 am to BBONDS25
Must be the new talking point since Flynn didn’t yield the result the left was hoping for.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:15 am to YankeeBama
No, Don jr has unlimited funds to fight it, so Bob's normal trick of bankrupting you into a plea deal won't work. And in a trial he's going to have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that whatever testimony inconsistency he's gonna base a charge on was intentional.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:16 am to SDVTiger
quote:
Judge Nap
He has got to be the worst talking head on FNC
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:16 am to BBONDS25
You said the same thing about anonymous sourcing about Trump wanting to fire Tillerson. It took longer than expected but it happened.
It's happened over and over, Bonds.
It's happened over and over, Bonds.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:18 am to BBONDS25
As Barry pointed out its old news. I just checked Reddit. The subreddits are from a month ago.
My guess is Don jr gets to be an unindicted co-conspirator.
My guess is Don jr gets to be an unindicted co-conspirator.
This post was edited on 12/6/18 at 10:19 am
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:19 am to narddogg81
quote:
And in a trial he's going to have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that whatever testimony inconsistency he's gonna base a charge on was intentional.
I don't really think Don Jr is going to be indicted. But if he is indicted, then I would strongly think it includes things other than making false statements / perjury.
I would guess if he was going to be indicted, it would include some financial crimes or campaign finance violations.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:19 am to TigerDoc
quote:
You said the same thing about anonymous sourcing about Trump wanting to fire Tillerson. It took longer than expected but it happened.
So...of the hundreds of claims made by anonymous sources, they got one right (kind of....if you consider trump firing someone months after a prediction getting it right). This is your basis for giving anonymous sources credibility? Oh Doc.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:19 am to YankeeBama
quote:
Will Don Jr be indicted?
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:24 am to Strannix
Yes a decorated platoon leader in Vietnam is scared of being called names on twitter by an orange turtle.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:26 am to BBONDS25
You did the same thing with anonymously sourced stories about likely indictments that came to pass.
I generally let it slide because I know it's your schtick but I'll get my back up a bit with you because you're the last one (he of the "I know that Dems are guilty because they always accuse others of what they have done") to have much room for making epistemic critiques.
I generally let it slide because I know it's your schtick but I'll get my back up a bit with you because you're the last one (he of the "I know that Dems are guilty because they always accuse others of what they have done") to have much room for making epistemic critiques.
This post was edited on 12/6/18 at 10:27 am
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:26 am to Tmcgin
quote:
Yes a decorated platoon leader in Vietnam is scared of being called names on twitter by an orange turtle.
You mean the Commander in Chief?
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:27 am to TigerDoc
quote:
You did the same thing with anonymously sourced stories about likely indictments that came to pass.
Which ones? Specifically? Don’t let it slide. Let’s go down this rabbit hole. Let’s look at the claim, my response, and the end results. Will be fun.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:33 am to YankeeBama
quote:
Will Don Jr be indicted?
Yes.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:33 am to YankeeBama
I almost hope they do so Trump can take the gloves off and go scorched earth on their arse.
Imagine that, they indict Jr. for going to a meeting set up by the Clinton campaign, but Hillary gets off scot-free after paying for the dossier and the email scandal.
Imagine that, they indict Jr. for going to a meeting set up by the Clinton campaign, but Hillary gets off scot-free after paying for the dossier and the email scandal.
Posted on 12/6/18 at 10:43 am to WillieNelsonsDoobie
quote:
Yes
For what?
Back to top


0






