- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wikileaks schools NPR, beats NPR like a rented mule
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:45 am to Navytiger74
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:45 am to Navytiger74
quote:this is comical given that liberal Northern enclaves are far less ideologically diverse than anywhere in the south
Unfortunately the southern mentality isn't especially well-suited to integrating unfamiliar or unpalatable ideas. It's part and parcel to the region's backward legacy.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:45 am to the LSUSaint
quote:
Not true. It distributes the truth. If ANY country is negatively impacted, that's their problem. All they have to do it quit doing shite that hurts your country, and therefore a hacker can't release it!
Selectively withholding portions of the truth is the same thing as lying.
quote:
That's how i can tell you don't own a company. If you did, and bad stuff was being done, YOU WANT TO KNOW! So if someone steals another employees emails that shows you the emails detail illegal activity, you don't get mad at the employee who brought it to you!
You made a great point about it and you didn't even mean to.
I do own a company, and you're full of shite. They'd both be gone.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 9:46 am
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:45 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Except the 1,600,000,000 common people in China and Russia. Thank God the poor serfs in Western Europe, Australia, and the U.S. have an advocate, though.
Yes, because the only explanation for Wikileaks posting more leaks on the West rather than Russia and China is because Russia and China are conspiring with Wikileaks. Let me help you think about it since it seems to be hard for you.
Possiblity #1: Wikileaks is composed of people from the West.
Possibility #2: Wikileaks volunteers and employees generally speak English and other European languages, making it more difficult to communicate with leakers from other parts of the world.
Possibility #3: Wikileaks is more concerned with corruption that involves the most influential entities of the world-- the US and its allies.
Possibility #4: Nations with less totalitarian governments tend to have less control over information and tend produce more whistle-blowers.
I could go on, but what is the point. Next you will tell me that the lack of leaks against North Korea means that Kim has a direct line to Assange and they are best pals.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:46 am to Navytiger74
quote:
Unfortunately the southern mentality isn't especially well-suited to integrating unfamiliar or unpalatable ideas
That you have gone here is sad.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:47 am to NIH
quote:
Either Russia is on the verge of being a failed state as you and your ilk like to claim or they are back to being the Soviet level enemy/co-super power.
Uh no. They are a fundamentally unsound state with a remarkable cyber and foreign intelligence capability. They have a lot of experience in doing more with less.
quote:
Is it also bang for the buck to fund and back candidates across the globe?
Oh I get it. You're still hung up on the election. Move on. It may have been the biggest event in your life, but I can assure you that for the rest of us it was just one of many elections.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:49 am to Navytiger74
quote:
They are a fundamentally unsound state with a remarkable cyber and foreign intelligence capability.
They single handedly installed Trump, you're right
quote:
Oh I get it. You're still hung up on the election. Move on. It may have been the biggest event in your life, but I can assure you that for the rest of us it was just one of many elections.
You literally just pulled the race/south is ignorant card because of your visceral hatred towards people on this board.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:49 am to ShortyRob
I would just like to point out that Iran OPENLY supported Obama's 1st candidacy.
Not a peep from NT.
Then, Iran got major concessions from the Obama admin.
Not a peep from NT.
Not a peep from NT.
Then, Iran got major concessions from the Obama admin.
Not a peep from NT.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:49 am to NIH
quote:Fake news. Within the OP was a claim that I said Wikileaks is fake. That's a lie. I addressed that and clarified the nature of my critique of the organization.
You didn't even address the OP or the first responses to you.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:51 am to Navytiger74
quote:
I addressed that and clarified the nature of my critique of the organization.
critique being "muh Russians"? What do you make of Feinstein's last comments re. Russia?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:52 am to ShortyRob
quote:Look at my join date. How could I address it.
I would just like to point out that Iran OPENLY supported Obama's 1st candidacy.
quote:I've discussed JCPOA at length. Started a few threads on it. My last post on the subject was as recently as two days ago as a matter of fact.
Then, Iran got major concessions from the Obama admin.
What does that have to do with this?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:52 am to LSU2a
quote:Yep. And, people tend to be most concerned with corruption that directly affects them.
Possiblity #1: Wikileaks is composed of people from the West.
quote:Self explanatory........or should be..
Possibility #3: Wikileaks is more concerned with corruption that involves the most influential entities of the world-- the US and its allies
quote:True since the dawn of time.
Possibility #4: Nations with less totalitarian governments tend to have less control over information and tend produce more whistle-blowers.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:52 am to ShortyRob
quote:
Then, Iran got major concessions from the Obama admin.
Not a peep from NT.
The little bitch actually said the Iran deal was amazing, that the people just didn't understand the "nuance"
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:53 am to NIH
quote:That there's no evidence of collusion between the campaign and the Kremlin.
critique being "muh Russians"? What do you make of Feinstein's last comments re. Russia?
What do you make of them?
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 10:13 am
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:54 am to CptBengal
quote:Yeah. I know. It's comical.
The little bitch actually said the Iran deal was amazing, that the people just didn't understand the "nuance"
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:54 am to ShortyRob
Y'all, it's obvious wikileaks has it out for the US. Pretty much all of their leaks from the dawn of their existence have been targeted at us.
That said, it doesn't somehow reduce the value of what we learn. Just be aware of the devil you're dancing with.
That said, it doesn't somehow reduce the value of what we learn. Just be aware of the devil you're dancing with.
This post was edited on 5/7/17 at 9:55 am
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:55 am to DisplacedBuckeye
quote:
Selectively withholding portions of the truth is the same thing as lying.
LOLOLOL. It doesn't change the truth and make illegal activity "ok". Geeez you are dumb and I know you own and run NOTHING
quote:
They'd both be gone.
You're lying. And IF you own anything, you're bad at it. Point being, if you were better at running said company, employee A wouldn't have to prove that employee B was doing illegal things.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:55 am to Navytiger74
quote:
That there's no evidence of collision between the campaign and the Kremlin.
What do you make of them?
Remember when you promised the board that the evidence waa there and it would come out?
Lolzy.
Fail.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:56 am to Tiguar
quote:
Y'all, it's obvious wikileaks has it out for the US. Pretty much all of their leaks from the dawn of their existence have been targeted at us.
Nah, they're just releasing the truth. Freedom. All that.
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:57 am to CptBengal
quote:
Remember when you promised the board that the evidence waa there and it would come out?
Remember when you had a meltdown about the Air Force tornado?
Posted on 5/7/17 at 9:57 am to Tiguar
quote:I don't disagree.
Y'all, it's obvious wikileaks has it out for the US. Pretty much all of their leaks from the dawn of their existence have been targeted at us.
quote:Exactly.
That said, it doesn't somehow reduce the value of what we learn.
quote:Of course. But, ya know. It's funny. It's not like they're leakign PRO-Russia stuff.
Just be aware of the devil you're dancing with.
People are just interpreting TRUE shite that is bad for the U.S. as "pro-Russia".
And ya know, it's about time that the American people outgrew their child like view of the American government as some group of benevolent people only looking out for their interests.
Fact is, history is NOT on the side of that interpretation.
Popular
Back to top


1







