- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why doesnt trump deport the families of business owners who hire illegals?
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:29 pm to mahdragonz
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:29 pm to mahdragonz
So we are going to punish business owners for the government failing to do their job, secure the border....
1
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:31 pm to Tim
quote:
So we are going to punish business owners for the government failing to do their job, secure the border....
Ignorance of the law is not a defense.
Except for Don Jr, apparently.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:37 pm to BamaAtl
quote:For the record, Mueller doesn't actually say that the only reason he didn't indict Jr. was because of ignorance of the law.
Except for Don Jr, apparently.
quote:
However, the report says, no prior court decision has treated “uncompensated opposition research,” such as the information promised by the Russians, as representing a “thing of value that could amount to a contribution under campaign finance law.”
Under the law, prosecutors had to prove that the value of the promised documents and information exceeded a $2,000 threshold to bring a criminal charge, as well as the $25,000 threshold for a felony, but it’s difficult to put a monetary figure on information.
“Although damaging opposition research is surely valuable to a campaign, it appears the information ultimately delivered in the meeting was not valuable,” the report said.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:41 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
He said that it likely violated campaign finance law, but it would be difficult to prove because there was no way to establish the value of such a thing.
It is, however, still illegal to accept foreign $$ of any amount for a federal election. Even if the help Russia gave Trump's campaign was worth $1, that's a felony. But ignorance of the law saved him there.
It is, however, still illegal to accept foreign $$ of any amount for a federal election. Even if the help Russia gave Trump's campaign was worth $1, that's a felony. But ignorance of the law saved him there.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:42 pm to BamaAtl
quote:
BamaAtl
Baby back cunt is afraid to answer. Come on little crawfishing slut.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:45 pm to BamaAtl
quote:No, he did not. Please tell me on what page of the Mueller report he says that. He explained his reasoning for not indicting:
He said that it likely violated campaign finance law
1) uncompensated opposition research has never been treated as something of value by law enforcement
2) there wasn't actually any valuable information exchanged.
3) ignorance of the law (hrc defense)
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:49 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
LINK
quote:
The investigation has not developed evidence that the participants in the meeting were familiar with the foreign-contribution ban or the application of federal law to the relevant factual context.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:51 pm to mahdragonz
Your boss isn't being deported.
You are
You are
Posted on 4/28/19 at 10:54 pm to BamaAtl
That doesn't answer my question. That was merely one reason why Mueller did not indict. He explained in the report why the counsel did not believe the meeting amounted to illegality.
Posted on 4/28/19 at 11:45 pm to mahdragonz
Bc they are citizens and that is unconstitutional. Brilliant question.
Posted on 4/29/19 at 6:31 am to mahdragonz
What makes you think that such people have any greater loyalty to their family than they do their country?
Posted on 4/29/19 at 8:44 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
quote:
That was merely one reason why Mueller did not indict
Which is the reason I cited, genius.
And why I cited it. Because it was correct.
Posted on 4/29/19 at 8:47 am to BamaAtl
Is a thread based on the absurd concept of "deporting" American citizens for a crime still going?
Come on
Come on
Posted on 4/29/19 at 8:56 am to mahdragonz
I can tell you that when you use E-Verify when hiring someone, the Govt can't even verify that person is legal. You make no sense!!!!!!!!! If we are following the rules, and the Govt can't even do their job on the website for us, how can you hold us accountable?
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News