Started By
Message

re: Why do you believe the intelligence community has been against Trump

Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:26 pm to
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Im of the opinion that we're not really losing any key capabilities.
You said "clean house." That implies fore everyone or most everyone.

quote:

The real spooks
The real spooks are field collectors and case officers. What they do is largely useless to the development of a comprehensive intelligence picture without mountains of analysts behind them.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135489 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

Maybe he should get his shite together. The whole country suffers when the president is flailing about.
Is he flailing? Seriously?

Or are Obamacrats breaking and/or ignoring the law in an attempt to slow the train?

Because most evidence points to the latter at this stage.

For example, what was Brennan's impact as a partisan hack on CIA morale?
Posted by GeauxxxTigers23
TeamBunt General Manager
Member since Apr 2013
62514 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

You said "clean house." That implies fore everyone or most everyone.
Im sorry. I meant clean house of his political enemies.

quote:

The real spooks are field collectors and case officers. What they do is largely useless to the development of a comprehensive intelligence picture without mountains of analysts behind them.
So says the analyst
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:30 pm to
If Brennan was a partisan hack he wouldn't have fought tooth and nail against the release of the Senate torture report
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Im sorry. I meant clean house of his political enemies.
Ah. See in certain agencies that gets murky. Even the career seniors, who are not appointees, take a special interest in this country's direction.

quote:

So says the analyst
Nice.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:39 pm to
quote:

Is he flailing? Seriously?
I mean I always reserve some room for rhetorical flair, but I don't think he's doing well. I read that little thread with people rating his first three weeks as 8-10 and saw that I was surrounded by unreasonable men on here, though.

quote:

Or are Obamacrats breaking and/or ignoring the law in an attempt to slow the train?
Again, what kind of toddler thinks the IC is full of liberal partisans? State leans left, but even they have managed to work for and support an expected 4-8 year swing in parties in power. Hell that's been the rule throughout the professional careers of most people conceivably working in the federal government.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:42 pm to
Look at the other thread dumbass.
Posted by Vacherie Saint
Member since Aug 2015
46042 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 3:46 pm to
I don't necessarily think they are. A lot of this is being blown way out of proportion or is pure speculation. That said, I do think that their are still many Dem loyalists in the IC and I do believe Obama had Trump watched throughout the campaign.

What Trump needs to do is start to flesh out the party loyalists from the IC and try to restore order asap.
Posted by TigerB8
End Communism
Member since Oct 2003
10849 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:01 pm to
Because Trump has no tact. The man has come in like a bull in a china shop. I like the fact he owes no one in power anything, but he should have had a "quieter" approach to coming into office. Insulting and pissing people off left and right before taking the oath yet has gotten the old guard IC people pissed off. Now they want to fire shots back at him.

Going in there like Hitler through Europe opening up multiple fronts is stupid. Man's gonna have a heart attack with all this shite that's going down. Trump needs to reel it in and settle things down before things get too out of control. The man isn't even working with a full staff yet and he's got more on his plate than just about any new president in recent memory.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135489 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:24 pm to
quote:

You said "clean house." That implies fore everyone or most everyone.
IMO the implication is we need to ferret out and identify sources of the leaked intel. We need to prosecute the SOBs to the fullest extent of the law. IC, Sally Yates, Robby Mook, whomever leaked classified material to the press. If it takes jailing reporters to unroof the shanker, so be it.
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 4:25 pm
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

IMO the implication is we need to ferret out and identify sources of the leaked intel. We need to prosecute the SOBs to the fullest extent of the law. IC, Sally Yates, Robby Mook, whomever leaked classified material to the press. If it takes jailing reporters to unroof the shanker, so be it.
Now, I really believe that. Irrespective of administration. I believed it about Manning, Snowden, Assange, Greenwald, and every other frick who thought he got to decide what was and wasn't available to the public and foreign powers. I threw up in my mouth when that frick Pollard got released.

But you and people like you believe it selectively. It's really galling.
This post was edited on 2/15/17 at 4:35 pm
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:34 pm to
Absolutionism is the crutch of the feeble minded
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:36 pm to
quote:

Absolutionism is the crutch of the feeble minded
Hypocrisy is the cornerstone of the unprincipled and spineless. Maybe you can impress me with some moral distinction between the Snowden leaks and the current leaks.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
135489 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

Or are Obamacrats breaking and/or ignoring the law in an attempt to slow the train?
Again, what kind of toddler thinks the IC is full of liberal partisans?
The IC? No, no.
The reference was inclusive of the 3 9th circuit judges, Yates, Brennan, and pond scum like Adam Schiff who I'd place money is source of at least some of the leaks. As I've said previously, aside from a few political appointees like Brennan, it could well be all sourcing of leaks is from outside the IC.
Posted by Sentrius
Fort Rozz
Member since Jun 2011
64757 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:37 pm to
quote:

But you and people like you believe it selectively. It's really galling.



A case can be made for exposing plain as daylight criminal wrong doing that the state wants covered up.

A case cannot be made for political and character assassination by the state against other state actors and private citizens.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:39 pm to
Snowden leaked affronts against citizens otherwise defenseless and unawares.

These leaks are against government officials who need to maintain some level of nuance to do their jobs.


Snowden leaked actual honest to god constitutional infringements



PS. I just wanted to rile you up because I am bored at work and expected you to just say "frick you Tigger" or something
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:43 pm to
quote:

A case can be made for exposing plain as daylight criminal wrong doing that the state wants covered up.

A case cannot be made for political and character assassination by the state against other state actors and private citizens.
Unauthorized communications took place. As evidenced either by Flynn lying to his superiors because he had something to hide or by those superiors cutting him lose to stem the infection. Whether or not those communications were criminal remains to be seen. But it will be seen. And I can only assume you want "the people" to be kept in the loop about that.

And I hope the leakers who broke the law are prepared to argue their case of patriotic duty in court, because they should be brought to account.
Posted by Iosh
Bureau of Interstellar Immigration
Member since Dec 2012
18941 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:45 pm to
Hey, I don't believe it selectively either. ALL LEAKS MATTER.
Posted by Tiguar
Montana
Member since Mar 2012
33131 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:45 pm to
To me, the biggest distinction is did the leakers (in any leak scenario) go through the established, proper channels for correction prior to leaking?

If you know something is wrong and tell the people who can do something about it, and nothing happens, I think you have some sort of moral obligation to shed light.


I don't think we know enough about the current situation to make this judgement one way or the other, yet, but maybe I'm just not aware of some info.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 2/15/17 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Snowden leaked actual honest to god constitutional infringements


Is that all he leaked? Only domestic programs? You sure?

quote:

Snowden leaked affronts against citizens otherwise defenseless and unawares.
Is clandestine, potential collusion by a senior figure in National Security with a generally hostile foreign power beyond the interest of the defenseless and unaware people?
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram