Started By
Message
locked post

Why do Marxists resist being called Marxists?

Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:27 am
Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15415 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:27 am
Against my better judgment, and for the entertainment of my approximate 25 Twitter Followers, I got into an argument with some moron on there who told me that “China wasn’t Communist, and Ilhan Omar wasn’t socialist.” This complete idiot told me that I only referred to Rep ISIS as a socialist, because I didn’t like her.

What the actual frick? I don’t understand why people who advocate for socialism, think it’s some kind of pejorative to be called a socialist. These morons just put the word “Democratic” in front of Socialist and somehow think that means it’s not totalitarianism. There are elections in freaking Venezuela.

I think socialism is a ridiculously bad and dangerous idea bc it’s a fast track to totalitarianism. But it’s just a political theory. Not a racial epithet.

And also the other thing that puts a bee in my bonnet is when dumbass leftists say that socialism isn’t Marxism. Uh. Yes it is. It’s a form of it. It’s sort of like there are shades of purple- that range from Lavender to Aubergine (that’s “Eggplant color” for you straight guys). What the actual hell is the difference btwn Marxism and socialism. Socialist is just a specific striation or Marxist.


TLDR:

1) Does anyone know why actual socialists think it’s an insult to be called a socialist?

2) Does anyone know why actual socialists think socialism isn’t a form of Marxism?

Maybe God. Leftists are just stupid.
Posted by Eli Goldfinger
Member since Sep 2016
32785 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:28 am to
Marketing
Posted by SouthernHog
Arkansas
Member since Jul 2016
6201 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:29 am to
quote:

Leftists are just stupid

/Thread
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11100 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:37 am to
My guess is the libs you speak of have a deep intellectual understanding of Marx and Marxism that no conservative could ever understand

I had a friend tell me the bartender crowd weren't marxists. I'm not really sure what a marxist is either if they aren't labeled that way. Any philosophy that pins people against each other by race or class is a marxist IMO but that apparently isn't technically correct to the "intellectual" crowd.
Posted by WizardSleeve
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2011
1801 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:38 am to
quote:

Marketing

Posted by Nguyener
Kame House
Member since Mar 2013
20603 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:39 am to
quote:

don’t understand why people who advocate for socialism, think it’s some kind of pejorative to be called a socialist.


Socialist and Communist revolutions and their governments are responsible for more death, poverty, and misery than any other cause combined for the last century.
Posted by Gaspergou202
Metairie, LA
Member since Jun 2016
13496 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:47 am to
Posted by WildTchoupitoulas
Member since Jan 2010
44071 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Why do Marxists resist being called Marxists?


quote:

Any philosophy that pins people against each other by race or class is a marxist IMO but that apparently isn't technically correct to the "intellectual" crowd.



Jesus, the idiocy never ends on this board.

Posted by Wednesday
Member since Aug 2017
15415 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:53 am to
Let’s stay focused on the issue.

What is the definition of Marxism?
How is it distinguishable from Socialism?
Why do Marxists and/or Socialists think it’s an insult to be identified as socialists and Marxists? (esp. If they think it’s such a fabulous and honorable ideal).
Posted by HotTakeHerald
Member since Sep 2017
129 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:54 am to
Well, western leftists don't seem to really subscribe to Marxist thoughts as much as they do redistribution. I think in common parlance, Socialism is used more to mean state intervention in consumption markets. Taxing production or collectivizing the product and then redistributing it socially.

On the other hand, Marxism has much less to do with redistribution or seizure of consumable goods, but rather a dismantling of private ownership of capital.

Socialism is associated with high taxes and high levels of social spending/redistribution. Marxism doesn't really need high taxes from the capital-owning class bc the capital-owning class wouldn't be making profit. The wealth that gets socially distributed or consumed would come from seizing capital, not seizing commodities. Taking the means rather than the fruits.

So, in short, socialism is typically used to refer to seizing production, and marxism seizing the means of production. These are distinct concepts, even if they have similar elements, so it makes sense we use 2 different words for them, even if you despise both.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11100 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:55 am to
Bless us with your wisdom
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123908 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:57 am to
quote:

Why do Marxists resist being called Marxists?
They prefer being called "Antifa"
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 8:58 am to
There are many forms of economic systems.
Posted by Little Trump
Florida
Member since Nov 2017
5817 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:00 am to
I think you’re onto something here

It’s all about the big lie
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260483 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:00 am to
quote:

western leftists don't seem to really subscribe to Marxist thoughts as much as they do redistribution.


Nah, Marxism and his socal theories are behind every bit about f it.

"The issue is never the issue, the issue is always the revolution"
Posted by yatesdog38
in your head rent free
Member since Sep 2013
12737 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:01 am to
Socialism is a buzz word to oversimplify economic systems that fail.
Posted by Kusagari12
Member since Sep 2016
296 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:02 am to
Unlike AOC and Tlaib, Omar won’t even call herself a democratic socialist. I’ve see her call herself a capitalist before, which is hilarious.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260483 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:02 am to
quote:

Socialism is a buzz word


Wrong.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11100 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:03 am to
Wouldn't you say that the marxist philosophy is entirely rooted in materialism and classism? That was the point I was trying to make. It doesn't matter how the distribution of resources is achieved in modern government (we have explicit institutions from preventing socialism), the fact that a politician believes that working people are being oppresed by coprate overlords and thus we should be taxing them to death instead of seizing their property doesn't matter. Not to mention that capital and entrepeneurship are two of the means of production that get maniuplated by government to fit their political desires.
Posted by HonoraryCoonass
Member since Jan 2005
18073 posts
Posted on 8/19/19 at 9:04 am to
Chris Matthews once asked former DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz to explain the difference between a dimocrat and a socialist. The question stumped her.

What’s the difference between a dimocratix and a socialist?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram