- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why didn't the Hard Rock building collapse like WTC building 7?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:33 pm to goatmilker
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:33 pm to goatmilker
quote:
If the towers were rigged to blow why the planes?
I mean that is a plausible theory.
Once the planes hit the building there is enough heat to ignite the preplaced thermite. Once ignited it does its cutting and just looks like it's part of the fire. It contains it's own oxygen source so it can get super hot (4500 degrees).
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:34 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
Yeah, it's well known that there were no electrical components in the building prior to 9/11/01
Fair enough. I don't like that theory anyway. Too messy.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:35 pm to GumboPot
quote:
It's boxes of fuse buses. Those were "college students" doing an "art project" in the WTC just prior to 911.
Aaaaand??
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:35 pm to GumboPot
quote:What do you think the purpose of those fuse boxes were for?
It's boxes of fuse buses.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:36 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Why not a partial collapse? That seems more probable. That is some column beams will fail before others
It's amazing how many statements you have made in this thread regarding likelihood and probability while simultaneously admitting you don't actually have the knowledge required to assess likelihood or probability
How do you not see this problem?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:36 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Bush and Cheney did a really good job when they personally wired the buildings for demolition. Then had the Israelis fly radio controlled airplanes into them
Weird that the dust from the building had the signature chemical composition of thermite. That jet fuel does work in mysterious ways.
That plan that hit 7 really got it good.
This post was edited on 10/17/19 at 2:37 pm
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:37 pm to goatmilker
quote:
What plane hit #7?
A chunk of one of the towers left a 20 burning hole in it.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:38 pm to Dale51
Did you know tower # 7 was only the 3rd sky scraper to ever collapse ever from burning? Tower 1 and 2 were the first 2.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:38 pm to GumboPot
quote:
Once the planes hit the building there is enough heat to ignite the preplaced thermite.
Really really really big building and kinda tall with a lot of beams and they put the charges right where they knew the planes would hit?
Or did they just coat every square inch of those non exposed beams?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:39 pm to goatmilker
quote:
Once the planes hit the building there is enough heat to ignite the preplaced thermite
My friends you could read AOC from now till the end of time and not read something dumber then the quote I just pasted
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:40 pm to russellvillehog
quote:
Did you know tower # 7 was only the 3rd sky scraper to ever collapse ever from burning? Tower 1 and 2 were the first 2.
I'm pretty sure the structural damage from the planes hitting 1&2 and the debris from them creating a gaping hole in 7 had something to do with it.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:41 pm to ShortyRob
And all of this silliness because supposedly we wanted to go to war. As if we've never figured out how to go to war before without blowing up buildings and nearly collapsing our economy at the same time.
As if they're needed to be some elaborate plan involving multiple planes to blow up buildings and blame it on terrorists.
hell you could have put charges in the buildings and blamed it on terrorists.
As if they're needed to be some elaborate plan involving multiple planes to blow up buildings and blame it on terrorists.
hell you could have put charges in the buildings and blamed it on terrorists.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:42 pm to Yak
quote:
What do you think the purpose of those fuse boxes were for?
Why, to wire together the charges used to bring down the buildings, of course.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:43 pm to russellvillehog
quote:
Did you know tower # 7 was only the 3rd sky scraper to ever collapse ever from burning?
Sounds unique indeed.
quote:
Yamasaki and engineers John Skilling and Les Robertson worked closely, and the relationship between the towers' design and structure was clear. Faced with the difficulties of building to unprecedented heights, the engineers employed an innovative structural model: a rigid "hollow tube" of closely spaced steel columns with floor trusses extended across to a central core.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:43 pm to ShortyRob
quote:Just wait until we get to the part where all the passengers (and all of their extended families and friends and coworkers) on the planes are on an island hanging out with Tupac and Elvis
And all of this silliness because supposedly we wanted to go to war. As if we've never figured out how to go to war before without blowing up buildings and nearly collapsing our economy at the same time.
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:44 pm to ShortyRob
Basically if the goal was to push us into war you could have just flown one plane into a building and probably been successful
if for some reason you believe that the buildings had to come down to hide something you could have placed charges and then use the truck bomb to take the b**** down and still gotten away with it
In fact there are about a thousand ways to have gotten us into war that would have been much simpler to execute if you're willing to just lie and kill thousands of people
if for some reason you believe that the buildings had to come down to hide something you could have placed charges and then use the truck bomb to take the b**** down and still gotten away with it
In fact there are about a thousand ways to have gotten us into war that would have been much simpler to execute if you're willing to just lie and kill thousands of people
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:44 pm to GumboPot
quote:
IDK for certain but there is no reason it cannot be hidden under the insulation.
How was it placed without someone seeing them place it? Hidden under insulation? Are you kidding? You are a nutjob.
This post was edited on 10/17/19 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:45 pm to russellvillehog
quote:
Did you know tower # 7 was only the 3rd sky scraper to ever collapse ever from burning? Tower 1 and 2 were the first 2.
How many buildings prior to Tower 1 and 2 had been hit by fully loaded with fuel Boeing 767s?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:46 pm to BugAC
quote:
You are a nutjob.
Why are you so triggered?
Posted on 10/17/19 at 2:47 pm to russellvillehog
quote:
Weird that the dust from the building had the signature chemical composition of thermite.
No, it didn't. USGS never reported key components of thermite in dust. They reported elements that were also commonly found in the materials of the building. Truthers have filled that in with their never ending conspiracy.
Back to top
