re: Why did Bud Light get the boycott but Jack Daniel's didn't?

quote:

---

I don’t drink

---

You keep repeating this as if anyone gives a shite.

quote:

---

it’s funny to watch everyone shite on BL while they consume other brands that are worse

---

at this point you're just refusing to understand why people are more mad at BL than other brands. Here's a very helpful hint....in the words of the BL VP of Marketing, you "just don't get it and are completely out of touch."

I hope that will help you understand....but I also think you've just entrenched yourself into your own moral superiority that you're afraid to change your stance.

quote:

---

No. They’re idiots for ever hiring that bitch that launched the campaign, my consistency is to point out how they are evil but so is every other brand but they get a pass. If you and others would post every product and company who does this you’d be left with nothing to use.

---

once again.....and please.....read the actual words that I'm posting.

Most people don't really give a shite about the tranny campaign. The big problem most people are having is with the VP of Marketing coming out after and verbally shitting on BL's long-time customer base.

I want you to read those previous two sentences very slowly and carefully. Repeat as necessary.

And then once you've fully understood those sentences....report back with any other major brands who have been doing the same thing.

quote:

---

He doesn't care. He also thinks Disney is doing great things and that Florida is a shithole.

---

oh god, He's one of those people?

Like I said on the last page, he used to be an enjoyable poster that had really funny quips. We definitely enjoyed his presence on the OM board but something snapped in the last year and he became so intolerable we had to boot him.

quote:

---

. And your OM board is dead so it’s not a big loss, you sure do like that I was removed and enjoy living in an echo chamber in a free speech country though. Mister freedom

---

case in point.

btw I'm still waiting for you to list the companies...

quote:

---

And your OM board is dead so it’s not a big loss, you sure do like that I was removed and enjoy living in an echo chamber in a free speech country though. Mister freedom

---

This gave me a good chuckle.

It just screams "mental stability", doesn't it?

I mean...none of us are totally "all there". We all share a fairly unhealthy obsession with collegiate sports.

quote:

---

Because posters on this board are retards

---

Whoa!
Unless "posters on this board" account for about half of Bud's sales, there is something just slightly more significant going on. IMO, it's high time. There is zero difference between Dylan Mulvaney's BS and Minstrel Show Blackface. They are caricatures playing off of unfavorable stereotypic characteristics. Giving his garbage a brand platform is ridiculous.

Meanwhile, AB's CIA-CEO has been next to worthless in handling it. He's extremely fortunate in the timing. BUD reported Q1 earnings earlier this month. None of the Mulvaney mess occurred in the first Q. So earnings were unaffected.

There is also some supportive gamesmanship in BUD stock trading. Around the time of the Mulvaney crap, BUD stockprice ... increased. It hit 2023 highs as sales first faltered. On 4MAY23, the day of its Q1 earnings report, even though BUD missed estimates, the stock price bumped back up to challenge its 2023 highs.

None of that makes sense. My guess is there's an ESG-related investment rescue prop involved. Perhaps, a major liberal-run fund-group(s) buying up BUD shares, concomitant with shorts purchased against the box to hedge the Q2 numbers.

Regardless, Mr ex-CIA-CEO has at least until the end of June to right the ship, and until 27JUL23 to report Q2 results. Earnings are projected at a rainbow&unicorn level of 80¢PS. BUD will miss. The question is by how much, and how that miss will be represented in the earnings call. My hope is BUD, and their ESG prop (aka Larry Fink?) get absolutely crushed.

Does that make me a retard in your mind, mot87?

quote:

---

Bud Light and Jack Daniels



I just threw up a little.

---

Well, beer before liquor...

quote:

---

Count me in as not "most people" then. I absolutely care about a tranny campaign which led to rape of a 14y/o girl, a second assault, and subsequent cover up in Virginia schools. I absolutely care about a tranny campaign which led to malignant prosecution of the 14y/o's father (she was anally sodomized by a tranny in the girl's bathroom) when he called out Virginia school tranny policies. I absolutely care about a tranny campaign berating girls and young women for recoiling from a dude with a penis claiming to be a girl and entering the showers with them. I absolutely care about a tranny campaign promoting drag shows and sex ed for 1st and 2nd graders. I absolutely care about a tranny campaign which takes away Title 9 rights and rewards in women's athletics. I absolutely care about a degrading tranny womanface campaign which stereotypically represents women as having the emotional maturity of a 12 yr-old.

---

And that’s my point, it’s not about their beer or CEO, it’s that all companies support trans. As a parent it’s frustrating to see ppl go after bud light when these fricks are coming after our kids and pushing this message that trans is okay because ESG.

I think you and others understand this but the two above don’t. It’s all companies and ubiquitous in society now that trans is okay. But we’ll laugh over tranny fluid and ignore everyone else.