- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:48 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
It wasn't an operation.
Benghazi?? Man....
smh
Do just a wee bit of little research. The truth is known. AND old news.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:49 pm to EphesianArmor
I'm well versed on Benghazi bud. You suggesting it is somehow not important is fricking absurd.
Speaking of truth and deflection, what did the Obama Admin blame the attack on?
Who was Sec of State? Who rejected additional funding and security measures? Who let a US ambassador on Libyan soil with a six man security detail and a bunch of local militia?
Speaking of truth and deflection, what did the Obama Admin blame the attack on?
Who was Sec of State? Who rejected additional funding and security measures? Who let a US ambassador on Libyan soil with a six man security detail and a bunch of local militia?
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 1:53 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:50 pm to FLTech
I like the message that a terrorists should not feel safe even if 20 years have gone by.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:51 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
I'm well versed on Benghazi bud. You suggesting it is somehow not important is fricking absurd.
I would be willing to bet that Hillary Clinton literally shite her pants at this news and then made someone clean it up for her.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:53 pm to AlterEd
It's so incredibly ironic this dipshit is saying Benghazi is a current deflection from Epstein given how the Obama admin handled the actual event
How much of the alleged Epstein shite happened prior to 2012?
How much of the alleged Epstein shite happened prior to 2012?
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 1:58 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:55 pm to DCtiger1
Right. This is huge news actually. 
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:56 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
I'm well versed on Benghazi bud.
Not in the slightest, pal.
You're light-years from knowing what really happened.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:57 pm to EphesianArmor
There is no statute of limitations on murder.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 1:58 pm to EphesianArmor
Considering I was on the ground after and heavily involved in the aftermath, I have full confidence I've forgotten more than you know.
I would ask what you think happened, but you won't provide an answer.
I would ask what you think happened, but you won't provide an answer.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 1:59 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:02 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
Considering I was on the ground after and heavily involved in the aftermath, I have full confidence I've forgotten more than you know.
And apparently still not privy to info readily available on the interweb not long after the "incident".
Grunts, soldier and and generals hardly ever know what plans are going on above them. There are reasons for chain of command and classified, partitioned knowledge.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:03 pm to DCtiger1
quote:
I would ask what you think happened, but you won't provide an answer.
Waaay past this nonsense, mack.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:05 pm to FLTech
Really? Because 4 Americans died there attacked by terrorists. It was all set up by Hillary Clinton and we were not suppose to be there. Hillary left a bunch of military vets to die there without back up. She basically tried to ignore them like she thought she could brush it under the rug and then lied about the entire thing. As they were being attacked, she wouldn't even take their calls. They sent numerous emails for 6 months explaining the situation and that they needed more people or to just pull out.
This post was edited on 2/6/26 at 2:06 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:07 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
And apparently still not privy to info readily available on the interweb not long after the "incident". Grunts, soldier and and generals hardly ever know what plans are going on above them. There are reasons for chain of command and classified, partitioned knowledge.
Wrong again. Between you and I, only one of us had a TS/SCI and it wasn't you.
quote:
Waaay past this nonsense, mack.
Typical response from someone out of their depth
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:15 pm to FLTech
quote:
Why are Pam Bondi & Kash Patel going after Benghazi?
Because Hillary said she wanted to stop playing games.
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:47 pm to FLTech
Because someone has to explain the "Stand Down" Order: for security contractors and why that counters what the CIA said at the time. This was a clear decision based on military SOP, so why didn't rescue and support take place?
This post was edited on 2/9/26 at 3:25 pm
Posted on 2/6/26 at 2:59 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
I don't understand why we wouldn't want to arrest these people.
It's a stupid thread
Posted on 2/6/26 at 3:07 pm to FLTech
quote:
The U.S. has arrested Zubayr Al-Bakoush, alleged to be one of the leaders of the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
This is a good thing.
Popular
Back to top


0





