- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Who ran the Clinton email investigation? Benghazi investigation?
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:34 pm
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:34 pm
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans.
If you supported those, you cannot in your right mind criticize the Mueller investigation for firing diehard, anti-Trump democrats. The Republicans that investigated Hillary still want to, and are still trying to.
If she came out and said she wanted only people who didn’t hate her investigating her, the PoliBoard would laugh for days.
If you supported those, you cannot in your right mind criticize the Mueller investigation for firing diehard, anti-Trump democrats. The Republicans that investigated Hillary still want to, and are still trying to.
If she came out and said she wanted only people who didn’t hate her investigating her, the PoliBoard would laugh for days.
21
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:34 pm to FT
I said a prayer for your downvote intake
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:34 pm to FT
Since when is Comey a 'diehard republican'
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:35 pm to FT
quote:
Who ran the Clinton email investigation? Benghazi investigation?
Who were on the teams of those special prosecutors again, remind me? Thanks in advance.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:35 pm to FT
Oh, the investigation where the suspect with=held information and the country let her get away with it.
Are you really using that whore as analogy to the current situation?
Are you really using that whore as analogy to the current situation?
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:37 pm to FT
Yeah, that's why I don't concern myself with any of these congressional investigations. They're nothing more than political grandstanding that results in absolutely nothing. It's just a game to make it appear as if people in DC are accountable.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:37 pm to TheXman
I was referring to congressional Republicans, but Comey was also a Republican, and widely praised here just before the election.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:37 pm to FT
quote:
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans. If you supported those, you cannot in your right mind criticize the Mueller investigation for firing diehard, anti-Trump democrats.
An independent counsel appointed "Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans?"
Oh, no. That's right. It was the GOP chairmen of House and Senate committees with their GOP staffs that conducted those CONGRESSIONAL investigations.
That is far different from a so-called INDEPENDENT counsel.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:38 pm to FT
quote:
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans. If you supported those, you cannot in your right mind criticize the Mueller investigation for firing diehard, anti-Trump democrats. The Republicans that investigated Hillary still want to, and are still trying to. If she came out and said she wanted only people who didn’t hate her investigating her, the PoliBoard would laugh for days.
What you just said is incoherent nonsense.
As per usual we are all now dumber for having read one of your posts!
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:38 pm to FT
Well, the Repubs did have a majority so it stands to reason...however, you're comparing apples and oranges. Since the DOJ was wholly in the tank for Obama and Hillary, nothing became of those investigations and no Special Prosecutor was appointed.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:41 pm to PanhandleTigah
Eleven hours in front of Congress and the nation, being grilled, and a Republican Congress coming up with nothing doesn’t matter?
There are plenty of ways Hillary could have been caught if she were guilty of anything.
None have turned up anything, and it is absolutely not for a lack of trying.
Edit: She is the greatest mastermind in history, and should lead the country based solely on how kickass that is, or she’s entirely innocent, and we wasted a massive amount of time trying to convict her, or she committed crimes and the Republican Congress, and now full government, with Trump in charge and with pledges to lock her up, can’t do it.
There are plenty of ways Hillary could have been caught if she were guilty of anything.
None have turned up anything, and it is absolutely not for a lack of trying.
Edit: She is the greatest mastermind in history, and should lead the country based solely on how kickass that is, or she’s entirely innocent, and we wasted a massive amount of time trying to convict her, or she committed crimes and the Republican Congress, and now full government, with Trump in charge and with pledges to lock her up, can’t do it.
This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:41 pm to PanhandleTigah
quote:
Well, the Repubs did have a majority so it stands to reason...however, you're comparing apples and oranges. Since the DOJ was wholly in the tank for Obama and Hillary, nothing became of those investigations and no Special Prosecutor was appointed.
This. And during the email investigation, the FBI was absolutely poisoned with Obama era lackeys. Comey and McCabe being at the top of the list.
This was a short sighted thread.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:42 pm to FT
you watch spongebob and blow spit bubbles, dont you?
quote:
FT
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:42 pm to FT
quote:
If she came out and said she wanted only people who didn’t hate her investigating her
There is a difference between only people who don’t hate her and not wanting only people that do hate her.
Who is calling for a trump-ally only committee? People are just against a Hillary-ally only committe, as both are equally ridiculous
This post was edited on 12/18/17 at 2:45 pm
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:42 pm to FT
quote:No one with an ounce of sense pays any attention to Congressional investigations. Example, most people on the poliboard pay attention to Congressional investigations.
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans.
If you supported those, you cannot in your right mind criticize the Mueller investigation for firing diehard, anti-Trump democrats. The Republicans that investigated Hillary still want to, and are still trying to.
If she came out and said she wanted only people who didn’t hate her investigating her, the PoliBoard would laugh for days.
Congress can very barely do the basic shite it's constitutionally mandated to do. And I mean very barely. And this goes back to the founding of the Republic.
Asking them to run a criminal probe is like asking a whore to run a monastery (and no, I didn't mean convent).
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:44 pm to FT
The Clinton email investigation never happened! That was a crime scrubbing intervention....
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:45 pm to FT
quote:
Who ran the Clinton email investigation? Benghazi investigation?
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans.
huh? To what are you referring?
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:47 pm to FT
quote:
Who ran the Clinton email investigation? Benghazi investigation?
Republicans. Diehard, aggressive republicans.
And just as many Democrats (minus one).
That's the way congressional investigative committees are run. It usually bipartisan unlike the Mueller investigation which is completely filled with Clinton hacks.
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:48 pm to Navytiger74
These investigations are easy to navigate. All you need are these phrases:
I don't recall
I can't remember the exact details
I can't comment due to the ongoing investigation
I don't have the exact figures
I'll have to find that out for you
It's hard to say for sure without the exact figures
It's classified
I don't recall
I can't remember the exact details
I can't comment due to the ongoing investigation
I don't have the exact figures
I'll have to find that out for you
It's hard to say for sure without the exact figures
It's classified
Posted on 12/18/17 at 2:50 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
These investigations are easy to navigate. All you need are these phrases:
I don't recall
I can't remember the exact details
I can't comment due to the ongoing investigation
I don't have the exact figures
I'll have to find that out for you
It's hard to say for sure without the exact figures
It's classified
Right. They are dog and pony shows. All bullshite. Nothing...absolutely nothing has come out of a congressional investigation. They are a big waste of time.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News