- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who is Vindman and what did he do?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:11 am to Godfather1
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:11 am to Godfather1
Bingo.
"Major Aggiedouche I feel confident that you order is a direct violation of the UCMJ and as such it is an illegal order I cannot follow". Now when Major Douche disagrees it is at that point you say well Major Douche at this time I feel I need to advise you I am following my chain of command and requesting a meeting with Col SuperStar.
"Major Aggiedouche I feel confident that you order is a direct violation of the UCMJ and as such it is an illegal order I cannot follow". Now when Major Douche disagrees it is at that point you say well Major Douche at this time I feel I need to advise you I am following my chain of command and requesting a meeting with Col SuperStar.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:11 am to Jbird
quote:I am asking a serious question, and it is unfortunate that you lack the maturity to treat it as such.quote:Who does the Major and I both work for?
Are you required to confront your major, rather than consulting the JAG officer?
So you seem to be suggesting that the captain should bypass the major and go to the colonel with his concerns. But that itself seems to be a violation of the chain of command, by leapfrogging the major.
You also seem to imply that it would be somehow improper for the captain to consult with the unit’s JAG officer in order to get some guidance as to how the captain should proceed with his concerns.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:12 am to AggieHank86
quote:
You want a closer analogy. Let’s use one.
We don't need an analogy to look at a real-world, specific example. People with military experience are telling you this clown acted improperly, and they explained why. You just don't like the answer. You can bring up hypotheticals until this reaches 20 pages, but it's not going to change the assessment of what Vindman did by people who understand the military.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:13 am to AggieHank86
quote:If he is a Captain that doesn't know then he should de discharged for idiocy in the face of stupidity.
You also seem to imply that it would be somehow improper for the captain to consult with the unit’s JAG officer in order to get some guidance as to how the captain should proceed with his concerns.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:14 am to AggieHank86
quote:No you dumb arse I did not make that suggestion.
So you seem to be suggesting that the captain should bypass the major and go to the colonel with his concerns. But that itself seems to be a violation of the chain of command, by leapfrogging the major.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:14 am to Jbird
quote:
Bingo.
"Major Aggiedouche I feel confident that you order is a direct violation of the UCMJ and as such it is an illegal order I cannot follow". Now when Major Douche disagrees it is at that point you say well Major Douche at this time I feel I need to advise you I am following my chain of command and requesting a meeting with Col SuperStar.
Oh, I completely get what’s going on here.
This is stuff that E-1s (some with barely a HS education) get once it’s taught to them.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:15 am to Godfather1
quote:Exactly I know you understand it in spades, But AggieTool still wants to play silly games.
Oh, I completely get what’s going on here.
This is stuff that E-1s (some with barely a HS education) get once it’s taught to them.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:19 am to Flats
quote:And I have read op-ed material from people with military experience who assert that the issue is much more ambiguous than it is being presented here.
You can bring up hypotheticals until this reaches 20 pages, but it's not going to change the assessment of what Vindman did by people who understand the military.
I did not have the opportunity to ask questions of those persons. I have that opportunity here.
The simple fact is that I do not have much respect for the intelligence of several posters on this thread. I do not doubt that they were able to follow orders at some point in their lives, but I doubt that they could analyze their way out od a wet paper bag. As such, I tend to doubt that this issue is nearly as clear-cut as they assert. I do think that Centinel is brighter than some of the others, so I have focused my questions upon him.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:20 am to AggieHank86
quote:
So you seem to be suggesting that the captain should bypass the major and go to the colonel with his concerns. But that itself seems to be a violation of the chain of command, by leapfrogging the major.
“Major Y, I cannot carry out this order as I feel it’s in violation of the UCMJ.”
“Captain X, you WILL carry out said order.”
“Major Y, I feel that it is my duty to inform you that I will be utilizing the chain of command and taking this issue up with Col. Z.”
That is how it works. That is NOT “leapfrogging” the Major. It’s taking it up the chain of command to appeal his decision.
You know, somehow I would think an officer of the court should understand that.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:21 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The simple fact is that I do not have much respect for the intelligence of several posters on this thread. I do not doubt that they were able to follow orders at some point in their lives, but I doubt that they could analyze their way out od a wet paper bag. As such, I tend to doubt that this issue is nearly as clear-cut as they assert. I do think that Centinel is brighter than some of the others, so I have focused my questions upon him.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:23 am to AggieHank86
quote:
The simple fact is that I do not have much respect for the intelligence of several posters on this thread.
Yeah, well, that’s back at you in spades, buddy.
You may have the law memorized, but I seriously doubt you’re much of a lawyer. Not quick enough on your feet.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:24 am to Godfather1
Is the ability to provide this sort of guidance not one reason for the very existence of a JAG officer?
Can the same not be said of the chief NSC counsel?
Can the same not be said of the chief NSC counsel?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:
And I have read op-ed material from people with military experience who assert that the issue is much more ambiguous than it is being presented here.
I did not have the opportunity to ask questions of those persons. I have that opportunity here.
I'm sure you could email them, but if you read their op-ed then you should already know their reasoning.
And you already know the reasoning of the people here. You've asked, and your question was answered several times. But you don't like the answers so you think if you can keep asking in a different way you'll get one you like. I doubt it, but feel free to try.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:25 am to AggieHank86
quote:I need a JAG officer to understand the chain of command?
Is the ability to provide this sort of guidance not one reason for the very existence of a JAG officer?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:27 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Is the ability to provide this sort of guidance not one reason for the very existence of a JAG officer?
If the supervisor wants to consult with the JAG officer on the validity of the order, then that’s on him.
As a subordinate, it’s not your place to go outside the chain of command and take it to the JAG yourself. Capiche?
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:28 am to AggieHank86
quote:
Is the ability to provide this sort of guidance not one reason for the very existence of a JAG officer?
Sure. After you let your boss know you're going to his boss and/or JAG.
quote:
Can the same not be said of the chief NSC counsel?
Sure. But he never bothered letting his boss know. And seeing as how he's a LTC, he damn sure knows he should have. No phone call, no email, nothing. Just straight to the lawyer.
Basic Trainees are taught these basic rules when then attend BCT. I expect more from a career officer.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:28 am to Godfather1
quote:
That is how it works. That is NOT “leapfrogging” the Major. It’s taking it up the chain of command to appeal his decision.
He doesn't understand the difference between skipping a step in the chain of command and going outside the chain of command.
This was foreign policy, and that's set by the Commander in Chief. This little shite didn't like it so he tried to subvert it. Everything else is superfluous.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:29 am to Flats
quote:Bingo.
He doesn't understand the difference between skipping a step in the chain of command and going outside the chain of command.
This was foreign policy, and that's set by the Commander in Chief. This little shite didn't like it so he tried to subvert it. Everything else is superfluous.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:30 am to Centinel
quote:
Sure. But he never bothered letting his boss know. And seeing as how he's a LTC, he damn sure knows he should have. No phone call, no email, nothing. Just straight to the lawyer.
Basic Trainees are taught these basic rules when then attend BCT. I expect more from a career officer.
There’s also the IG if you feel the chain of command has failed to properly resolve your issue.
But that is an absolute last resort.
Posted on 11/20/19 at 11:31 am to Godfather1
quote:You had better be 100% correct or it's going to cost you dearly.
There’s also the IG if you feel the chain of command has failed to properly resolve your issue.
But that is an absolute last resort.
Popular
Back to top


1





