Started By
Message

re: Who is ready for TRUMP to put the hammer down tomorrow? Updated

Posted on 3/25/17 at 12:54 pm to
Posted by Bullethead88
Half way between LSU and Tulane
Member since Dec 2009
4202 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 12:54 pm to
quote:

So you deny HAARP?

LINK

WARNING: THIS MAY NOT BE A RELIABLE SOURCE. (CONSPIRACY THEORY)

(Appears on the top of my screen when I access that site).
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 12:57 pm to
How is it your whiteknight was not aware of this? Being that he knows intel about Snowden I don't? There is even a newer clearance not listed and won't be unclassified for prolly 20 years. Think spacestation.
Posted by Porker Face
Eden Isle
Member since Feb 2012
15971 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:01 pm to
I'm guessing this will be another "promise" your great leader will fail to deliver on

I'm not sure he could even get 20 people to apply if he hosted a new series of The Apprentice. No one likes a feckless incompetent boss
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:02 pm to


You think a NATO classification term is relevant?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:03 pm to
quote:

Cosmic Top Secret (CTS)– This is the essentially the same as U.S. Top Secret but for NATO nations


Here's your hangup.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:05 pm to
sidenote question regarding the Navy: Are radiomen now all CTN's in the revised rating system?
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:10 pm to
quote:

How is it your whiteknight was not aware of this? Being that he knows intel about Snowden I don't?
Well if you'd ever worked in Intel you'd realize that being in Intel doesn't mean that you know everything about everything in Intel. If you don't serve with NATO or in a theater with a substantial NATO mission, there's no reason for you to randomly know about NATO classification.

Your "intel sources" have given you the impression that there's some intel google where you can go to just learn about anything intel related. And it assumes that you have unlimited time to intel google random intel shite.

quote:

There is even a newer clearance not listed and won't be unclassified for prolly 20 years. Think spacestation.
There are lots of SAPs and sub-compartments and other designations that aren't widely publicly known or even known outside very small circles on certain missions within certain agencies. But the formal levels of clearance and classification have been the same for decades. .
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:12 pm to
I knew you'd say that. It's not just for NATO nations but they can be included.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

Well if you'd ever worked in Intel you'd realize that being in Intel doesn't mean that you know everything about everything in Intel. If you don't serve with NATO or in a theater with a substantial NATO mission, there's no reason for you to randomly know about NATO classification.

Duh. He was saying it never existed period he is always right ya know.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:13 pm to
quote:

NATO classification


Indeed.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:15 pm to
so you are an civilain MD @ a classified military location or unit?
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:19 pm to
quote:

quote:

NATO classification.

Duh. He was saying it never existed period he is always right ya know.


That's not what I said.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
162925 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:23 pm to
quote:

Cosmic Top Secret


parsewording, you creepy AF magic eight ball contrarian troller freak.

quote:

That's not even a thing.
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:26 pm to
quote:

sidenote question regarding the Navy: Are radiomen now all CTN's in the revised rating system?
Not that I know of. More likely to be ITs. Some RMs went on to various CT ratings, but most went to IT.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:27 pm to
Well, use the right words.

You know this.
Posted by northshorebamaman
Cochise County AZ
Member since Jul 2009
37605 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 1:53 pm to
quote:


so you are an civilain MD @ a classified military location or unit

I could tell you but then I'd have to kill you.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 2:38 pm to
I know a few CTNs that were RMs back in the day. I believe they went RM>CTO>CTN.
Posted by 90proofprofessional
Member since Mar 2004
24445 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 2:42 pm to
quote:

More likely to be ITs. Some RMs went on to various CT ratings, but most went to IT

I knew some that were OS's. Mostly IT's though
Posted by Navytiger74
Member since Oct 2009
50458 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 2:47 pm to
quote:

I know a few CTNs that were RMs back in the day. I believe they went RM>CTO>CTN.
I forgot about CTOs, but that sounds right. And some went OS like 90p pointed out.
Posted by DisplacedBuckeye
Member since Dec 2013
76732 posts
Posted on 3/25/17 at 3:46 pm to
Yeah, it was a weird transition for everyone when cyber became the budget buzzword.
first pageprev pagePage 8 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram