- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who Here STILL DOUBTS That Indictments Are Coming?
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:03 am to BBONDS25
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:03 am to BBONDS25
quote:You answered your own question. They aren't transparent for a reason.
Not sure what your point is. Everyone knows who the President, vice-president, etc. are.
Yes, but they are the puppets, not the elite. The elite aren’t as transparent, right? I’m trying to find out specifically who that is,
The same reason criminals don't leave business cards at the scene of the crime.
People with real power (elite) won't even get mentioned. What we're seeing in this scripted soap opera are the puppets. Puppets are expendable.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:04 am to TX Tiger
quote:Not at all. He was. You seem to suggest differently
Surely you aren't questioning if Nixon was establishment.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:05 am to TX Tiger
quote:
If it was scripted, then somebody forgot to alert the media.
The media was on red alert. Why do you think it gave him 24/7 access? Why do you think it built his brand to rock star status?
Trump got more coverage because he was the one who 1) was surging in the polls, and 2) drawing 20,000 people per event. Trump EARNED his coverage, but it wasn't positive coverage. Just like studies have shown that 93% of the media coverage of President Trump is NEGATIVE.
Wrong again, TxTiger.
PS - Bernie was drawing the 2nd largest crowds, and they covered him, too.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:08 am to KCT
I definitely have my doubts. Maybe some low level fall guy or two. But none of the major players will be indicted.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:14 am to KCT
quote:He was surging in the polls and drawing crowds because he was a 24/7 media rock star. That didn't happen by accident.
If it was scripted, then somebody forgot to alert the media.
The media was on red alert. Why do you think it gave him 24/7 access? Why do you think it built his brand to rock star status?
Trump got more coverage because he was the one who 1) was surging in the polls, and 2) drawing 20,000 people per event. Trump EARNED his coverage
Compare that to Ron Paul, who won every straw poll and got practically zero coverage, except to degrade him and paint him as a kook. That's how you kill a campaign.
The media did the very OPPOSITE with Trump. It knew exactly what it was doing, and it worked.
The establishment knows what it's doing.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:14 am to TX Tiger
quote:
It's funny how you folks skyscream about fake news, but when fake news tells you 24/7 that Trump is anti-establishment, you believe them.
The media didn't have to tell us that Trump was anti-Establishment. When 100% of the elected Democrats and 70% of the elected Republicans are against you, you don't have to be a genius to figure out that the object of their disaffection is operating outside of the corrupt and bought-and-paid-for system.
Question, TxTiger. Do you think Paul Ryan was just pretending to not like Trump? Ryan fought Trump every step of the way, and even lied to Trump about funding the wall.
Was that all part of the script, too?
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:17 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Trump was specifically hand-picked by the establishment, as I illustrated in my last post.
This is why you are a punchline.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:19 am to KCT
Trump is not a guy I would mess with.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:20 am to KCT
quote:
It's funny how you folks skyscream about fake news, but when fake news tells you 24/7 that Trump is anti-establishment, you believe them.
The media didn't have to tell us that Trump was anti-Establishment. When 100% of the elected Democrats and 70% of the elected Republicans are against you,
Yes, I can feel the disdain from here.
Sorry sweetheart, you're being played. Don't get mad at me, I'm not the one playing you. They are.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:22 am to TX Tiger
quote:
I'm just bringing the facts.
No, you bring the beyond-comprehensible theory that you and only you are privy to some super-secret Intelligensia.
We've asked you repeatedly to start a thread where you break it all down for those of us who don't qualify for Super Genius status like you do, and you have failed to do so.
What you have offered is vague statements that you're bringing facts when all you do is blindly state that Trump was picked by "the establishment" and offer nothing in evidence.
And if you'll notice, this isn't the Q thread, so knock yourself out.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:28 am to KCT
quote:Nope.
Trump got more coverage because he was the one who 1) was surging in the polls, and 2) drawing 20,000 people per event.
Trump got more coverage during the GOP Primaries because he was who HRC wanted to run against. He was singled out as the "joke" candidate. He was the one whom both she and the MSM knew could not win. After all, they had the most devastating October surprise in the history of October surprises --- the BillyBush tape. The tone and disproportion of Trump coverage changed 180° as soon as he locked the Nomination.
Meanwhile, the Hillary campaign BirdDogged Walker, Rubio and others she did not want as opponents.
This post was edited on 4/25/19 at 10:31 am
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:31 am to VoxDawg
quote:
I'm just bringing the facts.
No, you bring the beyond-comprehensible theory that you and only you are privy to some super-secret Intelligensia.
I bring facts that are common knowledge IRL. That's what makes this board so entertaining. It's like some of you folks never look away from FOX News (that's a metaphor for the mainstream media).
ETA: I've echoed what the majority in this thread are saying. So it really isn't "super-secret Intelligensia" is it.
quote:I think that over 15 years of posting here I've made myself pretty clear. BTW, nobody is stopping you from starting such a thread. What are you afraid of?
We've asked you repeatedly to start a thread where you break it all down for those of us who don't qualify for Super Genius status like you do, and you have failed to do so.
This post was edited on 4/25/19 at 10:42 am
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:39 am to TX Tiger
quote:
Compare that to Ron Paul, who won every straw poll and got practically zero coverage, except to degrade him and paint him as a kook.
Sadly, Ron Paul was before his time. Also, his message was too cerebral for the masses (sad but true). And finally, the great Ron Paul did not even begin to have the same level of charisma as Donald Trump.
The media tried to KILL Donald Trump's campaign from the jumpstart. If you can find it, go back and look at the first GOP debate on Fox. It was held in either July or early August of 2015. Moderators Megyn Kelly AND Chris Wallace spent most of their time that night grilling Donald Trump. 10-12 other candidates on the stage, so why were they obsessed with taking down Trump?
If the media was in bed with Trump, as you claim, why were they doing this? Wouldn't they have been giving him the Obama treatment?
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:42 am to TX Tiger
Name all of the establishment globalist causes Trump has joined and gave accolades to: like all past U.S. Presidents have. Your theory he is a head fake establishment plant, does not ring true when the UN was told to pay and GFT, NAFTA, TTP was shut down.
Trump made it clear he was a NY democrat and knows the games played. So the photo of HRC at his wedding is no proof of anything. If you study Trump's interviews from way back to the 1980's he said the same thing he is saying today.
Fox News bashing and an old pic of Trump with the Clinton's is failed evidence of your claim.
I usually ignore you because you never post proof beyond a silly old picture. Post proof in here or STFU already.
Trump made it clear he was a NY democrat and knows the games played. So the photo of HRC at his wedding is no proof of anything. If you study Trump's interviews from way back to the 1980's he said the same thing he is saying today.
Fox News bashing and an old pic of Trump with the Clinton's is failed evidence of your claim.
I usually ignore you because you never post proof beyond a silly old picture. Post proof in here or STFU already.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:48 am to KCT
quote:That must have been why he won every straw poll.
Compare that to Ron Paul, who won every straw poll and got practically zero coverage, except to degrade him and paint him as a kook.
Sadly, Ron Paul was before his time. Also, his message was too cerebral for the masses (sad but true).
quote:As I said, the establishment chose wisely with Trump as their anti-establishment charlatan. They could not have hand-picked a better personality for the job.
And finally, the great Ron Paul did not even begin to have the same level of charisma as Donald Trump.
quote:You keep making my point. The media was obsessed with Donald Trump. It gave him 24/7 access and made sure his brand was plastered all over the media. That's how you BUILD a campaign, not kill it.
The media tried to KILL Donald Trump's campaign from the jumpstart. If you can find it, go back and look at the first GOP debate on Fox. It was held in either July or early August of 2015. Moderators Megyn Kelly AND Chris Wallace spent most of their time that night grilling Donald Trump. 10-12 other candidates on the stage, so why were they obsessed with taking down Trump?
quote:That's EXACTLY what it did. The media built Obama as the Second Coming. The media built Trump as anti-establishment God Emperor at a time when the American public was desperate for an anti-establishment God Emperor.
If the media was in bed with Trump, as you claim, why were they doing this? Wouldn't they have been giving him the Obama treatment?
As I keep saying, the establishment knows what it's doing. It didn't become the establishment by accident.
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:49 am to TX Tiger
quote:
BTW, nobody is stopping you from starting such a thread. What are you afraid of?
You want me to start a thread to explain why you're a pompous jerk with an superiority complex? That's a weird fetish.
This post was edited on 4/25/19 at 10:55 am
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:50 am to TX Tiger
Dude, that photo was circa 2005. Trump himself said that he schemed the system when he was a businessman. Gave money to both Democrats and Republicans. I've personally heard Trump acknowledge this dozens of times.
I don't hate you, TxTiger. I simply scratch my head and feel sorry for you. To be honest, your level of delusion is rarely seen.
quote:
Sorry sweethear
You know I'm a man, right?
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:52 am to cajunangelle
quote:
I usually ignore you because you never post proof beyond a silly old picture. Post proof in here or STFU already.
You tell him, CA (CM?).
Posted on 4/25/19 at 10:58 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Name all of the establishment globalist causes Trump has joined and gave accolades to: like all past U.S. Presidents have.
Bloating the MIC
Raising the debt
Hand-picked cuck to run the Fed instead of ending it.
Continues regime change agenda in the ME
Fills DC with swamp (Bolton, Giuliani, Powell, etc.)
Extended and expanded government spying on its citizens.
Protecting the Petrodollar with our military
and on
and on
and on
Posted on 4/25/19 at 11:00 am to VoxDawg
quote:In other words, you really don't want answers. Yeah, that's what I thought.
BTW, nobody is stopping you from starting such a thread. What are you afraid of?
You want me to start a thread to explain why you're a pompous jerk with an superiority complex? That's a weird fetish.
Go back to your fraud thread and stop being a cancer to all others. tia
Popular
Back to top



1







