- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White House blocks Ambassador to EU from testifying this morning, Schiff 9:30 presser now
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:00 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:00 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Hell many of them have concluded "high crimes" have already been proven by what's already out there. Let's do it then.
Are the board's leftists arguing against that? If so, why? Why the necessity for further House "inquiry" if it's already clear that crimes were committed in Trump's Ukrainian actions??
Are the board's leftists arguing against that? If so, why? Why the necessity for further House "inquiry" if it's already clear that crimes were committed in Trump's Ukrainian actions??
0
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:01 pm to bmy
quote:
Serious question. Is it "justice" if they bring articles of impeachment and the republican controlled hearing speeds through a trial with no substance to protect the president?
Under our current framework, absolutely.
I guess you want to change that? Tell us how.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:01 pm to yatesdog38
Hunh?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:02 pm to bmy
quote:
Omce impeachment is official the senate can subpoena whoever the frick they want
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:02 pm to bmy
quote:
Serious question. Is it "justice" if they bring articles of impeachment and the republican controlled hearing speeds through a trial with no substance to protect the president?
Yes because this current charade being perpetrated by the dims is baseless and is only being done to politically damage Trump.
Once again, dims projecting their own abuses of office onto others.
Did you ever answer my question about Schiff?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:04 pm to jawnybnsc
Full retard indeed. "Official impeachment" comes only after a FULL House vote as to whether to so so.
So that vote comes only after the accusing side's presentation, eh? How embarrassing, bmy.
So that vote comes only after the accusing side's presentation, eh? How embarrassing, bmy.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:05 pm to bmy
quote:
Gordon, one thing Kurt and I talked about yesterday was... President Zelensky is sensitive about Ukraine being taken seriously, not merely as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics.”
Uh - ya think he might be referring to Hillary/Obama here? They certainly manipulated Ukraine to do their dirty work.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:06 pm to davyjones
On another note, are we ever going to see the proof Schiff said he had on the collusion deal?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:07 pm to davyjones
We send cases to the jury all the time without the defense examining witnesses, subpoenaing documents, making any kind of argument, presenting any testimony or evidence . . .
oh wait . . .
we don't do that.
oh wait . . .
we don't do that.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:08 pm to Janky
quote:Shiff for brains had him by the balls on Muh Russians, wonder why the liar let him off the hook?
On another note, are we ever going to see the proof Schiff said he had on the collusion deal?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:08 pm to Janky
quote:
On another note, are we ever going to see the proof Schiff said he had on the collusion deal?
The good ship Adam Schiff is currently missing a rudder. Be patient, he will eventually circle back to previously failed attempts to get Trump.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:09 pm to Janky
Oh, he was talking about Trump's "Russia, if you're listening...." sarcasm at the podium. Schiff was just too embarrassed to state that openly.
And if Adam Schiff's too embarrassed to claim ownership of something he insinuated.....woah.
And if Adam Schiff's too embarrassed to claim ownership of something he insinuated.....woah.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:13 pm to Janky
quote:
There is nothing to address. That "clear" text says nothing of any importance. Maybe I am slow and can't follow along. Please break down the gotcha moment in this for me and be painfully specific.
Trump allegedly used his authority to pressure Ukraine into investigating the Bidens to benefit the Trump 2020 reelection campaign.
July 21 (4 days prior to Trump/Zelensky call)
Bill Taylor (paraphrasing):
'President Zelensky is sensitive about Ukraine being taken as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics'
US Ambassador to EU Sondland replies:
“Absolutely, but we need to get the conversation started and the relationship built, irrespective of the pretext."
The pretext Sondland is referring to is Zelenskys concern that Ukraine was being used as an instrument in the Trump 2020 reelection campaign instead of being taken seriously.
Is that specific enough?
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:13 pm to bmy
Sneaky little words like allegedly and paraphrasing...
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 1:14 pm
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:18 pm to SSpaniel
And it's not just a joke, those are serious efforts. There wouldn't be this time and effort taken to put such an argument together if it were just a joke. I wish it were a joke.
Scary.
**And leaving out "inconsequential" tidbits such as the immediate response to Bill Taylor "I believe you've gotten that wrong."
Scary.
**And leaving out "inconsequential" tidbits such as the immediate response to Bill Taylor "I believe you've gotten that wrong."
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 1:20 pm
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:19 pm to bmy
Yes, and it says absolutely fricking nothing. Congrats.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:21 pm to bmy
Sondland's words are not the smoking gun you obviously believe it to be.
In fact, they convey no sinister intent whatsoever.
In fact, they convey no sinister intent whatsoever.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:27 pm to Erin Go Bragh
quote:
In fact, they convey no sinister intent whatsoever.
Well, they do if you read them in a sinister voice, leave out certain parts and add other things that you think should be there...
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:29 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Well, they do if you read them in a sinister voice, leave out certain parts and add other things that you think should be there..
Ah, a parody of the words. I get your point.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 1:29 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
Well, they do if you read them in a sinister voice, leave out certain parts and add other things that you think should be there...
Or you could skip all of the above and just declare, without evidence, that there's sinister intent. Easy peasy.
Page 11 of 15
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News