- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White House blocks Ambassador to EU from testifying this morning, Schiff 9:30 presser now
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:25 pm to bmy
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:25 pm to bmy
quote:
Defend itself from what?
This bullshite clownshow. Do you think it is right that the left can subpoena (I don't think they can) people, but the right cannot?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:25 pm to Revelator
quote:
From a cascade of false charges and lies from ya boyz
Isn't the appropriate time for that after articles of impeachment have been drafted?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:27 pm to bmy
quote:
Isn't the appropriate time for that after articles of impeachment have been drafted?
That depends on the reason for impeachment. Is it purely a political stunt?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:32 pm to Jbird
July 21
Taylor: “Gordon, one thing Kurt and I talked about yesterday was... President Zelensky is sensitive about Ukraine being taken seriously, not merely as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics.”
Sondland's reply: “Absolutely, but we need to get the conversation started and the relationship built, irrespective of the pretext.
(Pretext = Ukraine being taken seriously and as more than just an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics')
It quite literally says:
"We need to get the conversation started and relationship built, even if it involves Ukraine feeling used as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics"
Taylor: “Gordon, one thing Kurt and I talked about yesterday was... President Zelensky is sensitive about Ukraine being taken seriously, not merely as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics.”
Sondland's reply: “Absolutely, but we need to get the conversation started and the relationship built, irrespective of the pretext.
(Pretext = Ukraine being taken seriously and as more than just an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics')
It quite literally says:
"We need to get the conversation started and relationship built, even if it involves Ukraine feeling used as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics"
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 12:39 pm
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:34 pm to bmy
And you think that is quid pro quo?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:36 pm to bmy
quote:
It quite literally says:
You're almost as good as Adam Schiff.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:37 pm to Janky
quote:
This bullshite clownshow. Do you think it is right that the left can subpoena (I don't think they can) people, but the right cannot?
Omce impeachment is official the senate can subpoena whoever the frick they want
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:37 pm to bmy
quote:
It quite literally says:
"We need to get the conversation started and relationship built, even if it involves Ukraine feeling used as an instrument in Washington domestic, reelection politics"
It also quite literally doesn't say that.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:38 pm to bmy
quote:
Isn't the appropriate time for that after articles of impeachment have been drafted?
It would be highly irresponsible and ill-advised to lay back and chill until an actual trial starts. Does that happen in courthouses? It's called pre-trial procedure.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:39 pm to SSpaniel
quote:
It also quite literally doesn't say that.
Oh? Interpret it for us then
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/IconLOL.gif)
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:40 pm to bmy
quote:
Omce impeachment is official the senate can subpoena whoever the frick they want
He is talking about the house, and right NOW. But you knew that right?
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:41 pm to Janky
quote:
And you think that is quid pro quo?
It's part/half of it
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:42 pm to bmy
quote:
Bill, I believe you are incorrect about President Trump’s intentions. The President has been crystal clear: no quid pro quo’s of any kind.
This is clear text not some subjective bullshite.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:42 pm to bmy
quote:
Oh? Interpret it for us then
It doesn't need interpretation. Just let the words speak for themselves. Why interpret anything, unless it's to change what they are saying to suit your needs.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:43 pm to omegaman66
quote:
He is talking about the house, and right NOW. But you knew that right?
So you want Republicans to subpoena individuals to.. testify on behalf of the president during an investigation of potential articles of impeachment?
I think we both understand republicans want this power to sway public opinion (and yes the dems want this too -- but it's their turn at the moment)
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:44 pm to Janky
quote:
This is clear text not some subjective bull shite.
BMY interprets that to mean "President Trump requires a quid pro quo before any action is taken."
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:44 pm to bmy
quote:
Isn't the appropriate time for that after articles of impeachment have been drafted?
Not if you believe that the Dems are doing this for show and plan to stretch it out indefinitely.
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:44 pm to bmy
quote:
So you want Republicans to subpoena individuals to.. testify on behalf of the president?
I think we both understand republicans want this power to sway public opinion (and yes the dems want this too -- but it's their turn at the moment)
Did you type that with a straight face? You couldn't have. It's not possible.
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:45 pm to bmy
quote:
Isn't the appropriate time for that after articles of impeachment have been drafted?
![](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/Images/Icons/Iconrotflmao.gif)
Posted on 10/8/19 at 12:45 pm to bmy
quote:
I think we both understand republicans want this power to sway public opinion (and yes the dems want this too -- but it's their turn at the moment)
Cot damn. I never thought you would come right out and say it. frick justice. fricking pathetic.
I may actually make that my sig quote.
This post was edited on 10/8/19 at 12:47 pm
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)