re: When you hear the word "Globalization" spoken by a US politician think one word...

quote:

---

I agree with you but we have lost. They will go to any measure to win and we are powerless. The sad thing is that the American tax payer is funding their destruction throughout the world. The only chance we have is to collectively as a whole refuse to pay taxes and defund the criminal organization.

---

The most infamous day in American history, 12/13/1913. It was also the same year the 16th amendment became law......, hmmmm?

quote:

---

Qualify free for me

---

It's pretty well outlined in the bill of rights

quote:

---

This is irrelevant and a strange example considering you think it somehow shows why sovereignty matters. 

---

Try to keep up, its not hard! Without the ability to manufacture bc you gave it away when you get invaded you have no ability to fight! Very relevant, very dangerous!

quote:

---

Because 7.7+ billion free people is better than 300 million free people  

And as a bonus.. 7.7 billion people is far harder to control than 300 million.

---

There you go again.... Utopia thinking! You want what we have then you will have to do what we have done!

quote:

---

How much do you drink? 

---

Not much, true email though.

You tell me what you think it i and explaine to me how globalization helps bilions attain it. Answer the question. Aside, to answer why it is bad. It spreads poverty. In short, to put it in lib terms, where will everyone flee to for asylum once the whole world is your definition of free? That is the point you are missing. It is a bad idea and it is obvious.

Treason, you say?

Look at it this way. If I make toothpicks in my little town of Flatbranch, Arkansas, I could sell my toothpicks only in my town and make $87 dollars per year. Or I can sell them in the entire state of Arkansas and make $5,000 per year. Or I can sell them in the entire beloved US of A and make $302,000 per year. Or I can go global and sell them worldwide under trading agreements which permit the movement of goods and free trade, under globalized international agreements, and make $2,548,372 per year.

But right wingers hate globalization. So I guess $87 per year is enough.

quote:

---

You tell me what you think it i and explaine to me how globalization helps bilions attain it. Answer the question

---

A global union/alliance with each member state agreeing on set of basic human rights. Free speech, due process, right to keep and bear arms, etc.

quote:

---

It spreads poverty. In short, to put it in lib terms, where will everyone flee to for asylum once the whole world is your definition of free? That is the point you are missing. It is a bad idea and it is obvious.

---

It spreads poverty? Or it spreads poverty out? Or maybe it benefits all countries involved?

Why does every republican assume that globalization requires the dissolution of the state?

So what happens when another larger company decides they can go get there toothpicks from a third world country for cheaper. Now do you just do the best you can selling your toothpicks at your original cost or do you just say the heck with it and cut your profit to compete or do you send your manufacturing oversea so your margins can stay the same. The obvious answer would be to try to stay competitive and follow the lead but in doing that you are most likely going to be paying the rich who poses the means to be able to keep that factor afloat and managing the investments while paying there conveyor belt workers far less than your $87. You could have been happy with what you had and lived a moderate life with your toothpicks at $87 a day, But you chose to let greed run your life and now your using someone to make it cheaper than what you could do own your own. Someone in this process got screwed but hey at least it you made all that money right. The sad thing is that taking away that trade from a third world country would be devastating to the workers on the factory floor as the company would probably just fire them. But what they are paying them considering the money a large Factory would generate is very sad, but it isn't going to help them in any form by you going global just so you can make yourself rich from the sake of being rich. Globalism isn't going to bring them out of the poverty its just going to put our lower class in the same predicament.

quote:

---

But right wingers hate globalization. So I guess $87 per year is enough.

---

Dawginthewoods did a good job yet keep in mind there are tons of issues withtrade that would take days to tell! However I want to make it simpler. Whenever you redistribute wealth you are essentially enabling those who don't earn through discipline and sacrifice. Overtime they become entitled. Markets expand and compress with entitlement folks you cannot compress and anarchy ensues. Look at the Venezuela for example! In order to have real global trade all labor cost must be equal. Which is an impossibility.

My point about globalization has nothing to do with what you made it, feeding the poor. It's about our constitution to be governed by our USA representatives not some Global head. So it doesn't matter what anyone thinks about globalization what matters are those who promoted it as our representatives they are committing a treasonous act!

Again, we hear another brainwashed liberal speak on hating our country, always looking at the bad as if there is a demon behind it. Sure America has its faults but good American men have always look to fix it and and even sometimes reconcile it. However you can say whatever you want but the answers are not bringing the globe together it is from within and through that experience the world is better for it! So let globe thank God for the USA!