Started By
Message

re: When did Republicans stop caring about bodily autonomy?

Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

I want to maintain bodily autonomy by allowing a woman to choose whether to bring a fetus to term.
If someone beat you about the head and face, would describe thst assailant as “maintaining bodily autonomy”? Clearly you would, as they can do whatever they want with their body, amiright?

That’s how stupid your premise is. There is no autonomy here.
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 10:41 am
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

The state can force you to give up hair, blood samples, can incarcerate you, can involuntarily medicate and commit you, etc.


When the state meets certain criteria, they can. Not as a blanket rule, without justification.

And we both know providing a hair sample and bearing a child are not the same level in terms of effect or risk.


Can the state force you to provide a kidney to transplant to an individual who is dying, provided you'll both live? It's to save a life, so you should have no problem with it.
Posted by SOKAL
Member since May 2018
4124 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
In this thread BamaAtl set out to prove how stupid she is.

She could have saved the effort, we already knew.
Posted by Ag Zwin
Member since Mar 2016
24872 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

The rights of one don't dictate that the other lose all autonomy.


Or their life.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Legally, since the 70s, viability is not considered in wether murder is charged in Alabama when it comes to a fetus.


Just whether the pregnant woman chose to have the fetus aborted or someone else violated her rights and killed it without her consent.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83293 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Except Obama who as a State Senator advocated letting babies that survived abortions die of neglect....

Except the NY Legislature.....

Except the Gov. of Virginia....

Except the thousands of Democrats who refuse to advocate any number of "Born Alive Protection" acts...
Well that's almost as rare as a medically required abortion but Bamatool won't care.
Posted by Boatshoes
Member since Dec 2017
6775 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:41 am to
The dhimmicrats are the party of murder and slavery...not us.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:41 am to
quote:

They can't be forced to forgo bodily autonomy by the state.
There is no autonomy. Premise failure.
Posted by DemonKA3268
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2015
21084 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

In this thread BamaAtl set out to prove how stupid she is. She could have saved the effort, we already knew.
Not only stupid but cowardly. Can't provide one shred of evidence to support her ludicrous claims.
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

This is covered under the Alabama bill..


"grave risk to the life of the mother" isn't all we're talking about here. There are many more risks involved with pregnancy than death.
Posted by civiltiger07
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2011
14977 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

IDX first involves administration of medications to cause the cervix to dilate. Dilation usually occurs over the course of several days. Next, the physician rotates the fetus to a footling breech position. The body of the fetus is then drawn out of the uterus feet first, until only the head remains inside the uterus. The physician then uses an instrument to puncture the base of the skull, which collapses the fetal head. Typically, the contents of the fetal head are then partially suctioned out, which results in the death of the fetus and reduces the size of the fetal head enough to allow it to pass through the cervix. The dead but otherwise intact fetus is then removed from the woman's body.


anyone that can read this and be ok with this happening for no other reason than the mother just not wanting the baby is a SICK individual.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
62486 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

All of them? I said try to bar, you guys aren't as successful as you'd like at preventing evil contraceptives from being available to lustful Americans!
Liar.
Posted by Animal
Member since Dec 2017
4341 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:42 am to
quote:

Fetus, not baby.
You are THAT gullible. All you have do is change a word and now you are a-ok with killing human babies


"That which you call a rose by any other name would smell as sweet."

Shakespeare figured out centuries ago changing the nomenclature does not change the nature of characteristics of said thing.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83293 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

There are many more risks involved with pregnancy than death.


Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

Would also imply responsibility and consequences for ending the life of another.


If that were the 100% guaranteed outcome and if contraception were widely available and 100% effective and if rape/abuse never happened, sure.

But none of that happens in that way, so we have to account for uncertainty. Clearly.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
293902 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:43 am to
Autonomy? Holy shite..
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

You left off the rest of my statement: "so long as her actions with her body do not result in the deaths of others."


She has the right to not have her bodily autonomy superseded by another.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
83293 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:43 am to
quote:

if contraception were widely available
Beautiful in it's stupidity.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26097 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

She has the right to not have her bodily autonomy superseded by another.


Another what? Person?
This post was edited on 5/16/19 at 10:45 am
Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
41184 posts
Posted on 5/16/19 at 10:44 am to
quote:

if contraception were widely available


Condoms are available at every drug store and pharmacy. So is plan b. You are just lying in this thread
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 52
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 52Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram