Started By
Message
locked post

What's the deal with assault rifles?

Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:56 pm
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:56 pm
I am not a gun person at all. I do not own any currently I like to shoot pistols sometimes at the gun range with friends(I dont fool with any guns bigger than that) So, please excuse my ignorance. After yet another mass school shooting, there has been a big hoopla on assault rifles.

This is not a troll thread at all. Someone please educate me on the matter, because I really don't know. From my very novice understanding, these assault rifles are basically military-grade weapons. They are much more dangerous than your standard, say, 9 mil or revolver. Yet, they are very easy for any civilian to buy and use. So much so, these weapons have been the weapons of choice for the monsters at Parkland, Vegas, Sandy Hook, Texas Church, etc.

Is any of this is true? If so, why are these weapons not being banned? What is the argument for allowing weapons of mass destruction in the hands of normal citizens? Or is everything I posted earlier a fallacy. I am truly interested in learning the big deal on not having gun control and whats true or not.
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120257 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:57 pm to
If its scary looking, its an assault rifle
Posted by papasmurf1269
Hells Pass
Member since Apr 2005
20893 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:57 pm to
Don’t feed the troll
Posted by Kafka
I am the moral conscience of TD
Member since Jul 2007
141864 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:57 pm to
assaulty
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83556 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

weapons of mass destruction


hard not to consider this a troll thread when you hide this in there
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73434 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

From my very novice understanding, these assault rifles are basically military-grade weapons.
Tell me more.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:59 pm to
quote:

They are much more dangerous than your standard, say, 9 mil or revolver.


Handguns kill far, far more folks than rifles "assault" or otherwise.

quote:

Yet, they are very easy for any civilian to buy and use.


No more easy than any other firearm.

quote:

So much so, these weapons have been the weapons of choice for the monsters at Parkland, Vegas, Sandy Hook, Texas Church, etc.


The equivalent of one of these shootings occurs every week, 10 days, fortnight in Chicago with handguns. Also, I should point out that firearms are HEAVILY regulated in Chicago, effectively disarming the law-abiding/innocent, while the criminal is free to operate as he always has - outside the law.
This post was edited on 2/18/18 at 8:00 pm
Posted by Rougarou13
Brookhaven MS
Member since Feb 2015
6839 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 7:59 pm to
“Assault weapons” are no different than any other rifle. Shoots the same ammo, at the same rate of fire. The difference is the cosmetics and ergonomics.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89511 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

Is any of this is true?


None of this is "true" insofar as that word has any meaning remaining in the public discourse in 2018.
Posted by indianswim
Plano, TX
Member since Jan 2010
18771 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:02 pm to
quote:

please excuse my ignorance


Nope. There’s only 800 threads on this from the last 5 days.
Posted by ABearsFanNMS
Formerly of tLandmass now in Texas
Member since Oct 2014
17453 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:04 pm to
quote:

From my very novice understanding, these assault rifles are basically military-grade weapons.


As a former military officer I can tell you that this is an outright lie. That statement is as about as true as saying a Berretta 92F/S is a “military grade weapon.

quote:

They are much more dangerous than your standard, say, 9 mil or revolver.


Once again this is MSM bunk. Just about any rifle is “much more dangerous” than any pistol.

quote:

What is the argument for allowing weapons of mass destruction in the hands of normal citizens?


Wow where the hell did you get that propaganda from

quote:

Or is everything I posted earlier a fallacy.


In a word....YES!
Posted by Brazos
Member since Oct 2013
20360 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:10 pm to
People are being murdered at an alarming rate in the inner cities by handguns but crickets by the MSM.
Posted by puse01
Member since Sep 2011
3742 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:13 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/17/21 at 4:51 pm
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73434 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:14 pm to
And concern troll is gone. LOL
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134860 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:14 pm to
quote:

these assault rifles are basically military-grade weapons

So is your pistol that you see no problem with owning.
Posted by beerJeep
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2016
35012 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:17 pm to
Posted by Kino74
Denham springs
Member since Nov 2013
5343 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

They are much more dangerous than your standard, say, 9 mil or revolver.


Virginia Tech massacre was committed by one guy with a 9 mm pistol and 10 round magazines. He killed 32.

quote:

Yet, they are very easy for any civilian to buy and use.


No easier than any handgun you mentioned.

Here's the real deal on gun control. None of it addresses crime. Let me give you some background. Back 1986 the NRA had spent 5 years trying to get the Firearms Owner Protection Act passed and in doing so, the democrats attached 922 (O) known as the Hughes amendment which banned new production of fully automatic weapons. See full auto, short barreled shotguns and rifles, suppressor and a category called "any other weapon" are legal so long as you get approval from the ATF. At this point we never had a registered full auto weapon used in a crime yet they were banned. We did get treated to watching 2 psychos with fully automatic weapons wreck havoc in Los Angeles though.

Fast forward to the 90s and we had a 10 year ban on new magazines past 10 rounds and features in semi auto firearms. Nothing changed. Matter off fact one proponent of the bans lapse was law enforcement who found the ban was useless. Rifles are rarely used and one cam see that in the FBI Uniform Crime Report. Typically 300 up to 400 a year. Shotguns usually close to rifle but handguns are a different story.

If you banned and confiscated every "assault weapon", you won't see a difference in crime plus the gun control advocates will just move on to another class they don't like.

I think instead of banning the number one rifle platform in the country we should spend our energy focusing on other areas like why the FBI failed to do their job.


Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:21 pm to
Thanks for the ones who actually posted a serious response.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

If you banned and confiscated every "assault weapon", you won't see a difference in crime plus the gun control advocates will just move on to another class they don't like. I think instead of banning the number one rifle platform in the country we should spend our energy focusing on other areas like why the FBI failed to do their job.


I can agree with this. I know taking away guns wont fix the problem. I was just wondering if it could help with the problem in any way.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15294 posts
Posted on 2/18/18 at 8:24 pm to
I'm in the middle of doing other things, sorry I cant respond back fast enough to please you.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram