- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
What was supposed to be the end-game on having a perpetually anonymous "whistleblower"?
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:18 pm
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:18 pm
This is what I don't understand. What is the scenario people were envisioning whereby this guy's identity was never going to be revealed, yet his startling spell-bounding information was going to bring down the President of the United States.
I could never figure out how exactly that was going to work in reality.
I could never figure out how exactly that was going to work in reality.
5
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:19 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I am still waiting to see where the whistleblower protection act, or any other internal IC regulations guarantees said whistleblower anonymity.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:20 pm to Y.A. Tittle
They simply do not have a plan. They never expected POTUS to release the transcript of the call. They have no idea whether to shite or go blind.
The state of the present day Democratic Party.
The state of the present day Democratic Party.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:21 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
whistleblower anonymity.
Doesn't exist
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:22 pm to Y.A. Tittle
This is a riff on their, "Not the evidence, but the seriousness of the allegation" play they like to try against Republicans.
A. He's not a whistleblower, and
2. His identity will quickly allow his biases and motivation to be transparent.
So, they hoped to simmer that over the October/November timeframe and build public opinion against Trump and for impeachment.
It isn't working.
A. He's not a whistleblower, and
2. His identity will quickly allow his biases and motivation to be transparent.
So, they hoped to simmer that over the October/November timeframe and build public opinion against Trump and for impeachment.
It isn't working.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:22 pm to Y.A. Tittle
shite, meet wall.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:25 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The whistleblower blower protection act doesn’t protect the identity of the person, it only protects them from professional retaliation.
And that’s assuming it’s a good faith claim
And that’s assuming it’s a good faith claim
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:25 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
If the witness is never produced then his story is both iron clad and ever changing to create the facts needed on demand.
Posted on 11/6/19 at 12:40 pm to Roger Klarvin
quote:
And that’s assuming it’s a good faith claim
THAT is something that I find extraordinary - the "WB" report is anti-factual - should be outed and prosecuted .
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News