
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is your personal definition of "globalism" ?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
Nothing about controlling your own destiny guarantees you will always be happy getting your own way.
Just because a woman rates a sexual encounter a 9.2/10 the next morning, but then a 2.1/10 seven months later doesn't mean her will was violated.
EDIT: Also, let's not pretend had the polling remained at 92% you'd concede the point. So go ahead and drop the bullshite. You don't really care about the will of those people. You just see my name and are trying to score points. That's why you didn't touch Bunk's mirror image argument of my own.
Just because a woman rates a sexual encounter a 9.2/10 the next morning, but then a 2.1/10 seven months later doesn't mean her will was violated.
EDIT: Also, let's not pretend had the polling remained at 92% you'd concede the point. So go ahead and drop the bullshite. You don't really care about the will of those people. You just see my name and are trying to score points. That's why you didn't touch Bunk's mirror image argument of my own.
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 5:38 pm
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:36 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Just because a woman rates a sexual encounter a 9.2/10 the next morning, but then a 2.1/10 seven months later doesn't mean her will was violated.
Your analogy is bad.
The question is how she rates the experience.
Which poll establishes the sovereignty? The one in January or the one in August?
The point, as usual, is over your head
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
2 threads and 48 hours you still haven’t defined anything lol
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:40 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Which poll establishes the sovereignty? The one in January or the one in August?
Was Maduro taken in January or August?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:41 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Was Maduro taken in January or August?
Sounds like January was ripe for emotional overreaction
Now that life has settled, it's most likely to be representative of how the population actually feels once the emotions subside no?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Sounds like January was ripe for emotional overreaction
Sounds like an outsider's opinion on internal politics. You're not going to "attack their sovereignity" are you?
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:46 pm to Azkiger
quote:
Sounds like an outsider's opinion on internal politics.
That's been your entire schtick here
quote:
You're not going to "attack their sovereignity" are you?
Using opinion polls to establish sovereignty is retarded. I'm just proving that point again and again. I'm only attacking unintelligent arguments and bad rhetoric, not Venezuelans
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's been your entire schtick here
No, I've never defined sovereignty purely from an outside vs inside framework. From the start I've allowed for outside involvement so long as it coincides with inside desires.
You need to take your disagreement up with your homosexual lover Bunk. He's the only that distilled this down to an outside vs inside issue.
quote:
Using opinion polls to establish sovereignty is retarded.
That's how elections work.
What you tried to do is say that because, 7 months later, most of the people regretted getting what they wanted, then that means their will wasn't listened too.
By that logic if at any point in a president's 4 year term his approval drops below 50% then the people weren't listened too.
No, dumbass, they still got to vote. They just regret their vote. Happens all the time.
The only difference here is you don't have the neurological hardware to have seen where this conversation was going from the get go and have now found yourself having to take retarded stances just to oppose me.
And, part of having a low IQ is that your pattern recognition is so bad you're not learning that this is almost always the natural outcome of our conversations. Leave it to SFPLC to continually eat the berries giving him the shits and not be able to figure out why his stomach is always upset.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 5:59 pm to SlowFlowPro
To me it’s putting the interest of some global group or agenda in place of your national interest.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:07 pm to Azkiger
quote:
From the start I've allowed for outside involvement so long as it coincides with inside desires.
Venezuela no longer has the "inside desire" using your own chosen metric
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Venezuela no longer has the "inside desire" using your own chosen metric
I want to make sure you're paying attention and/or smart enough to follow this converation.
What was my response to this exact point? Hint: It's literally in my previous post.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:28 pm to Azkiger
quote:
The only difference here is you don't have the neurological hardware to have seen where this conversation was going from the get go and have now found yourself having to take retarded stances just to oppose me.
Says the guy who just tried to equate opinion polls with voting
quote:
And, part of having a low IQ is that your pattern recognition is so bad you're not learning that this is almost always the natural outcome of our conversations. Leave it to SFPLC to continually eat the berries giving him the shits and not be able to figure out why his stomach is always upset.
quote:
Now this is where your point has been refuted and you refuse to waive the white flag and engage in the ad homs y
You do the same thing every time.
Maybe one day you'll actually make a point
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the guy who just tried to equate opinion polls with voting
For the purposes of this conversation its a perfectly fine comparison.
quote:
You do the same thing every time.
Maybe one day you'll actually make a point
This is part of the reason why people don't see you as clever/intelligent. Beyond being unable to substantiate most of your claims, you're horrible at insults.
All you've done in this thread is lob "I know you are but what am I?" responses over and over.
I'm going to do what you said you would do nearly 5 hours ago.
This conversation is over.
Sad.
This post was edited on 9/27/26 at 6:44 pm
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:46 pm to Azkiger
quote:
For the purposes of this conversation its a perfectly fine comparison.
It's never a good comparison
I'd love to see you try to actually make a coherent point that encompasses all of your posts in this thread, where none of your posts conflict with the point. You have relied on so much pivoting, bad rhetoric, and bad metrics this is going to be a joy to watch, IF you attempt it.
I don't think you will even though I did give you definitions earlier and answered everything honestly.
Posted on 9/27/26 at 6:49 pm to TutHillTiger
quote:
To me it’s putting the interest of some global group or agenda in place of your national interest.
International governance style
Posted on 9/27/26 at 8:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
answered everything honestly
Everything you posted here beginning with your subject was dishonest.
You had zero interest in hearing what anyone had to say in regard to globalism. Your only interest was in making yourself feel superior.
All ~500k of your posts demonstrate this truth.

Popular
Back to top

1









