- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What is the logic behind this deportation? What is the purpose?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:29 am to 4cubbies
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:29 am to 4cubbies
quote:
, that she failed to demonstrate that she would suffer extreme hardship if deported.
Exactly. She failed to prove her case.
Then tried a sham marriage, that when caught admitted too.
Then tried another marriage and found out she had screwed herself with the sham marriage.
Then tried having a baby and claiming that would cause hardship if deported.
And on and on with appeals and trying to bury her case with paperwork.
The point is she should have been sent home long ago. Just because she wasn't doesn't preclude doing it now. Her "being a threat" has nothing to do with it.
The big difference here is I would say the same even if she was in DC on Jan 6th wearing a MAGA hat and holding an American Flag. There is a right way period.
You on the other hand feel free to disregard facts or laws that don't fit your left leaning views. You try to use religion as cover and twist and turn the facts while picking and choosing. By law they can ship her home. Period.
Why do you feel someone who admitted to a sham marriage to circumvent immigration laws should be allowed to stay?
This post was edited on 6/27/25 at 10:32 am
0
Posted on 6/27/25 at 10:59 am to Chancellor
quote:
She isn’t here legally and she must return to her home. This is not her home and she broke our laws to be here.
What law did she break? Our government granted her permission to be here as long as she complied with certain requirements - and she did.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:00 am to AndyJ
quote:
The law of against staying here illegally
Show me the law she broke. You can’t.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:00 am to Penrod
The argument seems to be that the government can change its mind for any or no reason, which is true. But "because ICE said so" isn't a compelling justification for this woman's detention and presumed future deportation.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:04 am to 4cubbies
Think of it as At-will employment. Just because you worked at a company for years doesn't mean you can't be fired.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:07 am to Azkiger
quote:
What law did she break?"
As if she doesn't know the fricking answer...
She doesn’t know the answer; you don’t know the answer; and I don’t know the answer. Our government gave her permission to stay, so she was not breaking laws by staying. Our government has chosen to revoke that permission to stay. If she contrives a way to stay, without government permission, then she would be breaking laws. So far, she hasn’t.
The question now is: Is it wise for our government to revoke the permission for this (apparently) law abiding, productive woman to stay. Based on what I’ve read so far my answer is no, it is not wise.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:09 am to Chancellor
quote:
She isn’t here legally and she must return to her home. This is not her home and she broke our laws to be here.
“No one is above the law.” Remember?
Yep, so true, but bleeding-heart liberals will continue to find examples to try and get people to feel pity for them. I see it a different way- This lady has been here 50 years and still never obtained citizenship?? How freaking stupid can you be!!
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:11 am to Chancellor
What law did she break?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:13 am to Penrod
quote:
She doesn’t know the answer; you don’t know the answer; and I don’t know the answer. Our government gave her permission to stay, so she was not breaking laws by staying. Our government has chosen to revoke that permission to stay. If she contrives a way to stay, without government permission, then she would be breaking laws. So far, she hasn’t.
The question now is: Is it wise for our government to revoke the permission for this (apparently) law abiding, productive woman to stay. Based on what I’ve read so far my answer is no, it is not wise.
Have a well earned upvote.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:16 am to VeniceBeachMouton
quote:
What law did she break?
Maybe playing semantics here but I think overstaying a visa and being caught in a sham marriage to circumvent immigration law is good enough but I'm sure liberals who are fine with all sorts of violence and destruction when it suits their cause would disagree.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:17 am to Penrod
quote:
Show me the law she broke. You can’t.
The people deporting her can show it to you. Why don't you dial them up and ask them?
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:21 am to SpartanSoul
quote:
Maybe playing semantics here but I think overstaying a visa and being caught in a sham marriage to circumvent immigration law is good enough
The government disagreed with your take for more than 40 years and even collected tax dollars from her.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:22 am to VeniceBeachMouton
Being here illegally. Is kinda shitty use of resources tho. Bringing a convoy of ICE agents to haul off an old lady when there are construction sites operating in the wide open full to the brim will illegals stealing American jobs. Really just have to deport them all.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:27 am to 4cubbies
quote:
The government disagreed with your take for more than 40 years
There is a new sheriff in town. The fact that the government has chosen not to detain/deport this woman in the past does not change the fact that she lost her asylum case. She has no legal basis to stay.
Posted on 6/27/25 at 11:29 am to 4cubbies
No, those are fact of record.
She was allowed to stay and now things might have changed. Might be time to go, maybe she's allowed to stay, we will see. But it seems "my take" is now the govs take.
I don't really care about this one case, I'm glad to see any movement including the gang roundups, workplace raids and this "low hanging fruit".
She was allowed to stay and now things might have changed. Might be time to go, maybe she's allowed to stay, we will see. But it seems "my take" is now the govs take.
I don't really care about this one case, I'm glad to see any movement including the gang roundups, workplace raids and this "low hanging fruit".
Posted on 6/27/25 at 12:56 pm to RohanGonzales
quote:
Show me the law she broke. You can’t.
quote:
The people deporting her can show it to you.
quote:
RohanGonzales
So you concede.
Page 26 of 26
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News