re: What is happening to the MAHA movement?

Banning sounds straightforward, but with something this embedded in modern agriculture it would have many knock-on effects (e.g. higher food prices, more soil disturbance, and Big Ag would shift to other chemicals that aren’t obviously better). There's a lot that could be done short of bans with reducing reliance and tightening safeguards rather than flipping a switch overnight, though. Curious if you’d see that as a step in the right direction.

Yes, I agree with your position on immunity if not your interpretation of the strength of the evidence of glyphosate harms. RFK Jr. stood up for glyphosate's safety, seems to just want to go after Monsanto, says it's the adjuvants not the active ingredients that's harmful. I take it that's not good enough for you? You'd prefer a total ban?