- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What if, Tactical Nuke on Kiev
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:41 pm to John Barron
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:41 pm to John Barron
quote:
We are not launching Nukes over Ukraine
Who is ‘we’ bitch? You aren’t an American. Shut up for a bit.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:41 pm to OchoDedos
NATO is a defensive treat. Do you think they would escalate to a all out nuclear war. And, if say Germany responded with some IRBM of their own, non nuclear as they don't have nukes, only NATO members with nukes are England, France and the US that country would then have hit first and I'm not sure a bunch of the NATO folks would want to jump into the nuclear fire.
I'm not pro-Russia I'm just saying the Ukes don't have them, I don't see NATO starting World War III and I don't think China would do much.
They'd be a pariah state sure, but the world is full of seedy fricks and it would not be long before some needed what Russia has etc.
I think mostly Putin would be worried about a coup from inside over the use over a response from outside.
I'm not pro-Russia I'm just saying the Ukes don't have them, I don't see NATO starting World War III and I don't think China would do much.
They'd be a pariah state sure, but the world is full of seedy fricks and it would not be long before some needed what Russia has etc.
I think mostly Putin would be worried about a coup from inside over the use over a response from outside.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:42 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
You aren’t an American
I am more American than you will ever be you Globalist Cock Sucker. MAGA just took over Poland you weak bitch

Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:43 pm to John Barron
You blow Russian every fricking day jerk off.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:43 pm to John Barron
quote:
No there would not be
Were you in the Military? Ever stationed in Europe? Potentially tasked with delivering a nuclear weaopn? If not, then shut your f'ing trap, or go cut and paste a response. Your good at that.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:43 pm to John Barron
quote:
I am more American than you will ever be you Globalist Cock Sucker. MAGA just took over Poland you weak bitch
Which is bad for Russia.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:43 pm to John Barron
Nah, we will turn Poland just like we turned every right-leaning nationalist you morons elect. The Poles despise the Russians, thankfully.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:44 pm to OchoDedos
Soon he will be Groking this up.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:45 pm to Jbird
Shut up lying ShitBird. I already proved you are a POS liar. Mr. "I misremembered" fricking clown
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:45 pm to John Barron
Heywood ja Blo me you gutter slut.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:46 pm to hansenthered1
Ukraine struck 4 bases that held Russia’s bombers, many of which had been used to drop payloads on Ukraine and to launch cruise missiles. I’m sure they weren’t all derelicts. Of course, Russia doesn’t have advanced bombers, so it’d be hard to tell.
This post was edited on 6/1/25 at 8:56 pm
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:47 pm to crazy4lsu
quote:
Nah, we
No you won't you anti American Globalist Cock sucker. Watch what happens next week. Jaws will hit the floor.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:48 pm to John Barron
quote:
Watch what happens next week.
lol shut up
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:48 pm to John Barron
More like your drawers hit the floor bitch.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:54 pm to Kentucker
Hey, they were functional bombers. I think they took a big strategic hit with these last attacks. But they have more ways to deliver than by aircraft. They demonstrated this a few months ago with a IRBM strike.
I'm not sure NATA has full resolve if pushed I think a lot of the countries would opt for a neutral stance if things started heading toward full on war. If so, Russia would have broken NATO without firing a shot at NATO. The Russians nuking Ukraine would not trigger article 5. They would just look like crap, even more so, and the UN would try and do something, they'd veto anything that came tried to come out of the security council.
The reason I'm asking this now is due to the success of the strikes on the Bears. This will escalate and I'm wondering if Russia is getting close to roll the nuclear dice. I hope not.
I'm not sure NATA has full resolve if pushed I think a lot of the countries would opt for a neutral stance if things started heading toward full on war. If so, Russia would have broken NATO without firing a shot at NATO. The Russians nuking Ukraine would not trigger article 5. They would just look like crap, even more so, and the UN would try and do something, they'd veto anything that came tried to come out of the security council.
The reason I'm asking this now is due to the success of the strikes on the Bears. This will escalate and I'm wondering if Russia is getting close to roll the nuclear dice. I hope not.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:56 pm to hansenthered1
quote:
I'm not sure NATA has full resolve if pushed I think a lot of the countries would opt for a neutral stance if things started heading toward full on war.
Based on what?
quote:
The reason I'm asking this now is due to the success of the strikes on the Bears. This will escalate and I'm wondering if Russia is getting close to roll the nuclear dice. I hope not
They've been nuclear saber-rattling to every provocation. They aren't going to risk a nuclear response for a non-nuclear threat.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:58 pm to crazy4lsu
This implies someone with nukes would attack them. I'm not buying that. The fact is if Ukes had a few nukes, they would never saber rattle.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 8:58 pm to John Barron
quote:
MAGA just took over Poland you weak bitch
Projection. Poland will do what they do. They used to be pulled by communists. Not something they want anymore.
Posted on 6/1/25 at 9:00 pm to hansenthered1
The issue is that no one other than the US has used nuclear weapons in war. The Russians don't know the other side of the calculus if they use nukes first. That is a situation in geopolitics which makes states err on the side of caution, i.e., not use nukes unless used first.
Unless you think the Russians are potentially suicidal, then they won't use nukes.
Unless you think the Russians are potentially suicidal, then they won't use nukes.
Popular
Back to top
