- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We Stand With Franklin
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:05 am to Oswald
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:05 am to Oswald
quote:
The "Call to Activism" writer obviously didn't actually watch that clip before posting.
Oh, they probably did. But they're banking on their followers just taking their followers just taking the statement at face value and not actually watching the clip at all.
That's Gaslighting 101. That's exactly how "influencers" and the Narrative Control Apparatus works. It's all about the propaganda, and having an understanding of basic behavior.
1
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:06 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
So it’s obvious the Democrats are done with the Epstein files.
Damn... With Thanksgiving and the Seditious Six I honestly forgot all about it.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:06 am to Oswald
quote:
The "Call to Activism" writer obviously didn't actually watch that clip before posting.
I watched it. She was nervous and had practiced the response in her mind. She passed the buck as fast as she could. Again, what is our objective down there around Venezuela? I guess the administration will keep on keeping on. But they don't have to show each and every boat being blown up to bring attention to the matter. We have an idea now of what they are doing.
I also suspect there are numbers of military members leaking stuff to the press.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:11 am to Jbird
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:17 am to LuckyTiger
quote:
I’ve watched the military blow up suspected militants (and the people around them) then fire another one to finish off survivors.
Al Qaeda militants? Militants that were in *actual* armed conflict with the United States? That would be legal. I don’t have a problem with that.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:19 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
That's Gaslighting 101.
Declaring this an emergency and war worthy.
Yes, we're being gaslight, but not the people you think is doing it.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:19 am to Decatur
quote:How about 16 year old Americans?
Al Qaeda militants? Militants that were in *actual* armed conflict with the United States? That would be legal. I don’t have a problem with that.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:29 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Yes, we're being gaslight, but not the people you think is doing it.
You're mistaken.
I'm very much on record as saying we're being gaslit by everyone and from all angles. I haven't been at all reserved about that.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:43 am to Jbird
The target was an Al Qaeda leader. It was a righteous strike.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:49 am to Decatur
An innocent 16 year old American was killed you GAF?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:53 am to Jbird
quote:
An innocent 16 year old American was killed you GAF?
I said the strike was righteous for targeting a leader of Al Qaeda. I don’t think they knew the kid was there.
This post was edited on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to Decatur
quote:
The target was an Al Qaeda leader. It was a righteous strike.
Evidently not. They just thought it was at the time.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:54 am to Decatur
quote:
The target was an Al Qaeda leader. It was a righteous strike.
Because Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization, right?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 10:56 am to Decatur
quote:
I said the strike was righteous for targeting a leader of Al Qaeda. I
IF you believe everything the military and their intelligence is pushing.
You would be a very rare person, if you do. Most of us have grow out of that kind of blind trust.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:01 am to BBONDS25
quote:
Because Al Qaeda is a terrorist organization, right?
One that we were in an actual armed conflict with and had Congressional authorization to use force.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:02 am to Decatur
quote:
I don’t think they knew the kid was there.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:05 am to Jbird
You didn’t have a problem with us droning the kid’s 40-year-old American father, did you?
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:06 am to Decatur
Just trying to figure out the level of faux poutrage you actually have.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:07 am to Jbird
The real reason behind the outrage is to avoid pissing off their illegal voter horde which probably comprises 40% of the Democrat electorate now. The Democrats would stump for Hitler or Mussolini if it guaranteed them power.
Posted on 12/2/25 at 11:07 am to JackieTreehorn
quote:
The Democrats would stump for Hitler or Mussolini if it guaranteed them power.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News