- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: We now know who Q is!
Posted on 3/18/21 at 9:46 am to DownHome
Posted on 3/18/21 at 9:46 am to DownHome
quote:
all of the other threads on the board are lame and boring except the meme thread.
Very true. "Qtards", (how original), seem to have a little hope, (false or not), all this insanity is serving a higher purpose and will result in "the best is yet to come" quote being true after all. No matter how it happens, (Trump or no Trump).
One thing is very obvious. What we see going on now is INSANE!
Maybe this is the "pain" part. The "other threads" seem stuck on Liberal vs. Conservative, Republican vs. Democrat, black vs. white and so on.
For those concerned the "Q" phenom makes them look bad because of "Crazy Conspiracy". Those concerns are duly noted.
Now, back to the "shew".
WWG1WGA
Posted on 3/18/21 at 10:03 am to LookSquirrel
quote:
The "other threads" seem stuck on Liberal vs. Conservative, Republican vs. Democrat, black vs. white and so on
Get back in your cattle chutes you filthy animals!
Posted on 3/18/21 at 10:18 am to cajunangelle
quote:
hopium denial knows it is all nonsense?
Of the 4k+ threads...
About 3k are exposition/tweets
1k are news stories or quotes
A few hundred are nonsense/hopium...
Is that what you fight against? Or is that the cra cra cat bae from the TP coming out?
I think it's the rah rah and lingo that gives you the willies...?
Posted on 3/18/21 at 2:46 pm to IceTiger
angelle just goes where the wind blows
Posted on 3/18/21 at 2:58 pm to supatigah
Angelle isn't interested in a flame war that you bumped this thread for.
Try to push your Q thread another way I won't bite.
Try to push your Q thread another way I won't bite.
Posted on 3/18/21 at 3:38 pm to cajunangelle
NTY;
John here to help
quote:
The United States has no "Nuclear Response". We have no active deterrent system. And hostile countries are aware of it. We are under attack. Our country is wide open. The military cannot launch independently.
After an "election", the president-elect is given training and briefings on a nuclear response to attack, this includes the nuclear football. On inauguration day the previous president will have their football go inactive at the same time the new president's nuclear football
activates. For the most part the nuclear football, the case that follows the president everywhere, has authentication codes and possible targets, pre-selected and activated by further codes.
Bi-den WAS MENTALLY UNABLE TO RECITE THE CODES NEEDED FOR AUTHENTICATION AND RESPONSE TO A NUCLEAR ATTACK.
He was unable to recite the codes, which makes him also unable to accurately choose a targeted response or launch said response.
Despite numerous attempts and with as much simplification as possible, Bi-den was unable to accurately activate, authenticate, and operate the system. (No one can help him do this.)
On inauguration day president Trump's football went dormant. And was returned to DC.
On inauguration day "president Bi-den's" football also went "inactive" (unsecure). Since then we have not had a nuclear response possible. The United States is wide open to attack. The football does not travel with him anywhere. The best of response would be well over an hour
John here to help
Posted on 3/18/21 at 4:20 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
ngelle isn't interested in a flame war that you bumped this thread for.
Try to push your Q thread another way I won't bite.
that's pretty funny when you have about 10% of the replies in this thread
I did notice you declined to comment on my posts about how Q (aka Jim and Ron Watkins right?) has managed to avoid exposure when it is so obviously a LARP or is it a PSY-OP? Or a PSY-OP LARP? so hard to tell, why dont you Google it for us and tell us definitively that you have the answers
For the record there is no flame war with you, you were one of the biggest participants in the Q thread for over a year. So there is no war at all, unless you are in some kind of conflict with yourself.
you have almost singlehandedly kept Q alive on this board since inauguration day with your obsessive posts and references to Q in threads about Q, threads that have nothing to do with Q. So how about this crazy cat lady, move on from your Q obsession or get in the mix and defend your position. You can't have it both ways.
Paranoia will destroy ya
Posted on 3/18/21 at 4:40 pm to supatigah
quote:
angelle just goes where the wind blows
Like a fart
Posted on 3/18/21 at 4:50 pm to supatigah
quote:I didn't comment on your posts because there is nothing to say. You twist things around so you can save face after parroting Q on this board, using your status to protect the Q talk clique for years.
hat's pretty funny when you have about 10% of the replies in this thread
I did notice you declined to comment on my posts about how Q (aka Jim and Ron Watkins right?) has managed to avoid exposure when it is so obviously a LARP or is it a PSY-OP? Or a PSY-OP LARP? so hard to tell, why dont you Google it for us and tell us definitively that you have the answers
For the record there is no flame war with you, you were one of the biggest participants in the Q thread for over a year. So there is no war at all, unless you are in some kind of conflict with yourself.
you have almost singlehandedly kept Q alive on this board since inauguration day with your obsessive posts and references to Q in threads about Q, threads that have nothing to do with Q. So how about this crazy cat lady, move on from your Q obsession or get in the mix and defend your position. You can't have it both ways.
Paranoia will destroy ya
It is bunk, it was not helpful to anyone-- it caused nothing but division on this board and you are looking for a fight and I won't allow you to take out you being duped on a flame war with me.
No one responded to your posts because it is obvious that you are obsessed in keeping Q alive; and joining in childish flames of those that dare to question Q.
I did indeed comment in this thread and do comment in Q threads. I posted a gif calling you Q apologists, because you are.
Yet, more Q crap is posted I ignore it and you assisted Down and Ice in goading me out for a fight. You are the one that is obsessed with Q and keeping the nonsense alive. You were duped, move on.
Your post is flaming me using juvenile cat lady talk and you are a moderator on this board? Shame on you.
Look at the john here to help post above yours. Look at all the Q posts in the last few pages, they are all bunk.
You are desperately grasping because after the thread turned into Q posts with the poster wanting a new Q thread-it went ignored for a damned good reason. How about calling out the batshit posts on the last few pages instead of being pissed your Q apology went ignored?
Posted on 3/18/21 at 4:53 pm to supatigah
This is getting interesting, again.
Posted on 3/18/21 at 4:56 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
It is bunk, it was not helpful to anyone
Your opinion, which I respect.
quote:
it caused nothing but division on this board
Why do Q threads keep popping up out of anger and invective towards a curious group of people that discuss different ideas and things heard/read?
I have not seen a thread that did not begin with some variation of q-tard.
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:04 pm to TheRouxGuru
quote:
They don’t even realize that Q is good for our country, if it is indeed legit
quote:
if it is indeed legit
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:08 pm to cajunangelle
And you talk in third person?
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:12 pm to Pecker
And here’s Pecker being not interested in Q....You and CA are like moths to a flame with this .
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:24 pm to Pecker
Supa must feel all proud getting a few of his Q clique to high five him and flame me.
There is no rational discussion of the origins or even ending of Q. Because the clique of juveniles still want to apologize in many paragraphs; how Q was good even if Ezra Cohen said is was dangerous foreign & (our CIA) trolling them with the pig farmers help.
They should gear their anger toward CodeMonkey.
They know more than the Asst. Nat Sec advisor, you see.... Because they learned how to post lame haiku's and research what Assange, Guccifer, WikiLeaks, Snowden already said.
Q taught them to research and be warrior Gods that got us an impeached Trump for the very thing they promoted-insurrection.
There was a meme posted of Q people on Noah's Ark and non Q people drowning on this board; with the 'anons knew' garbage for nearly 4 years.
But Supa wants to flame me and get his clique to pile on. What a sad joke.
There is no rational discussion of the origins or even ending of Q. Because the clique of juveniles still want to apologize in many paragraphs; how Q was good even if Ezra Cohen said is was dangerous foreign & (our CIA) trolling them with the pig farmers help.
They should gear their anger toward CodeMonkey.
They know more than the Asst. Nat Sec advisor, you see.... Because they learned how to post lame haiku's and research what Assange, Guccifer, WikiLeaks, Snowden already said.
Q taught them to research and be warrior Gods that got us an impeached Trump for the very thing they promoted-insurrection.
There was a meme posted of Q people on Noah's Ark and non Q people drowning on this board; with the 'anons knew' garbage for nearly 4 years.
But Supa wants to flame me and get his clique to pile on. What a sad joke.
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:29 pm to Cromulent
Why don't you and Supa go through each Q post in this thread-- including the loon, johnheretohelp saying Biden has no football...and point out some facts? Try to stay away from flaming people and post facts.
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:30 pm to cajunangelle
I don't get it, although I think I remember your rational regarding your "beef" against "Q", or "Q" discussions anywhere on this board. BUT, you you seem really smart and very informed.
I know Freedom of speech is not a solid argument on an LSU message board. That said, why are you the arbiter of what many here in this community would like to discuss?
Freedom of discussion.
ETA: Okay, you just referred to me as "a loon". I would almost think, (even if "lunatic" claim is an accurate one), that you, as clever as you are, do this an a premeditated attempt to sabotage..., you sir, now appear to be unhinged.
Must be the chem., trail brainwashing or your MK-Ultra kicking in, Bourne style.
I know Freedom of speech is not a solid argument on an LSU message board. That said, why are you the arbiter of what many here in this community would like to discuss?
Freedom of discussion.
ETA: Okay, you just referred to me as "a loon". I would almost think, (even if "lunatic" claim is an accurate one), that you, as clever as you are, do this an a premeditated attempt to sabotage..., you sir, now appear to be unhinged.
Must be the chem., trail brainwashing or your MK-Ultra kicking in, Bourne style.
This post was edited on 3/18/21 at 5:45 pm
Posted on 3/18/21 at 5:34 pm to cajunangelle
And I see you brought your clique also. You show up in every Q thread to mock everyone. You even create threads to do so. Do you see what’s happening in the world today? Is it wrong to believe in hope?
Popular
Back to top


1








