- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:33 am to boomtown143
quote:
so why is this just coming out now??
Shouldn't this person have outed him a year ago?
would have been a lot more helpful.
I'm skeptical of the link.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:35 am to cajunangelle
quote:
His findings could end this peach mint farce in a nano second.
They obviously don't want to end this in a nanosecond. Trump's lawyers neglected to take an argument that would lead to immediate dismissal. Apparently nothing is going to happen about the iWatches being worn in the chambers yesterday either despite McConnell saying they have kill switches in place for shenanigans.
And why did they leave traitors in place when they got into the White House? Because they want this trial to take place and they want to call deep state conspirators to the stand. It's obvious at this point.
Hell, I think the entire thing is probably illegal and shouldn't even proceed. But it's gonna. Because they want it to.
This post was edited on 1/22/20 at 9:38 am
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:37 am to PhDoogan
While this is most likely true, I hold this to the same level of accountability as I do all "Anon Sauces". Subpoena their emails and text messages and let's see what's there.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:38 am to memphisplaya
quote:
I'm skeptical of the link.
Paul Sperry was the one who had the nads to out Ciaramella as the whistleblower. To date, no one, including the WB's lawyers, have discredited that report. FWIW
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:38 am to PhDoogan
He's got them "blew eyes"......... one blew this way, and one blew that way......LOL.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:38 am to memphisplaya
quote:
I'm skeptical of the link.
I would not be, they are on it and legit.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:42 am to PhDoogan
Talk about being able to sit on the front porch and counting the chickens in the backyard...
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:43 am to PhDoogan
Holy shite, I don't know if he's looking at me or the vending machine behind me to my left.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:44 am to PhDoogan
quote:
Paul Sperry was the one who had the nads to out Ciaramella as the whistleblower. To date, no one, including the WB's lawyers, have discredited that report. FWIW
Alright. I had just never heard of RealClearInvestigations. Had to do my own research.
quote:
These media sources are slightly to moderately conservative in bias. They often publish factual information that utilizes loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes) to favor conservative causes. These sources are generally trustworthy for information, but may require further investigation. See all Right-Center sources.
Blah blah blah and then I looked at the stories they said were "emotionally loaded headlines"
quote:
“2016 Trump Tower Meeting Looks Increasingly Like a Setup by Russian and Clinton Operatives”
quote:
“Mueller Still Relying on Discredited Steele Dossier.”
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:49 am to BoarEd
quote:
That dude is a weird looking motherfricker. It looks like he was wearing lipstick a short while ago and it smeared all over his face. And his eyes are looking in two different directions.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:52 am to PhDoogan
And we now have a meme representing the men’s version of crazy eyes.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:55 am to PhDoogan
He looks like he is getting a colonoscopy in that photo.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:57 am to PhDoogan
Just like the SC, this was engineered from day one by partisan democrats.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 9:59 am to PhDoogan
quote:Is this what the peach mint R lawyers keep referring to Schiff keeping classified in the SCIF so their whole case isn't ruined?
this article makes a distinction between public information released about the unnamed whistleblower/CIA analyst and specific information about Ciaramella
I watched Schiff late into the night and he accused the Trump lawyers of keeping incriminating evidence classified regarding VP Pence's aide's testimony.
It is crazy how Schiff accused of what he was guilty of; at the same time he dirtied up Pence.
They will go after Pence and Barr if Turtle allows them an inch in this peach mint trial.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:05 am to cajunangelle
quote:
Is this what the peach mint R lawyers keep referring to Schiff keeping classified in the SCIF so their whole case isn't ruined?
The only thing that I know they haven't released, which Nunes has referenced on occasion, is Atkinson's testimony- specifically 30 pages of it that he indicates would blow the lid off the whole impeachment. So probably so.
This post was edited on 1/22/20 at 10:06 am
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:07 am to PhDoogan
Yep, that's it. It isn't enough that the corrupt IG Atkinson said the whistle blower was hyper-partisan. So imagine what Schiff is hiding...
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:09 am to cajunangelle
quote:
the corrupt IG Atkinson said the whistle blower was hyper-partisan.
But credible.
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:16 am to PhDoogan
quote:
Obama administration holdovers working in the Trump White House
Why have any of these around?
Posted on 1/22/20 at 10:16 am to PhDoogan
Great post - just saw it on Rantingly.com which has become a "Better than" replacement for the now completely crazy leftist Drudge.
I do not know how much of the CIA is as leftist as Ciarmella but it looks scary!! Deep State must be outed and removed!
I do not know how much of the CIA is as leftist as Ciarmella but it looks scary!! Deep State must be outed and removed!
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News