Started By
Message

re: Watch Tom Cotton Stonewall Slack-jawed Reporter

Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:06 am to
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98730 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:06 am to
Lololololololol
Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
30112 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:07 am to
That ole boy is what they call "not ready for prime time".
Posted by ynlvr
Rocket City
Member since Feb 2009
4587 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:13 am to
Andrew Ross Sorkin interview With Cotton earlier this week
Posted by prostyleoffensetime
Mississippi
Member since Aug 2009
11434 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

WSJ is dancing around it. I’m not sure why. They said nothing in the “corporate records” indicated Joe was part of it.

Whoa! They didn’t include Joe’s name in their money laundering scheme? Shocked.


This part has been hilarious to me. Bet they also thought Tony Soprano really did make all that money in the garbage business.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:18 am to
quote:

WSJ is dancing around it. I’m not sure why. They said nothing in the “corporate records” indicated Joe was part of it.



Our "unbiased" press is Trump's prosecutor and Biden's defense attorney.

Grab any shred of "evidence" and run with it.
Posted by rgsa
La.
Member since May 2015
2361 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:19 am to
Posted by Jumbo_Gumbo
Denham Springs
Member since Dec 2015
5691 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:20 am to
It warms my heart to see Republicans FINALLY getting a sack and fighting back. Sad thing is, the ones willing to fight back are few and far between.
Posted by razthecat
Bay Minette, AL
Member since Oct 2010
2352 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:20 am to
what a smug little prick that reporter is.
Posted by Turbeauxdog
Member since Aug 2004
23176 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:23 am to
quote:

What did the WSJ say?


The wsj checked the incorporation documents and didn’t see joe.

They also say the texts didn’t mention joe.

The entire story is that hunter kept Biden in the business but off the paperwork and referred to joe by pseudonyms.

The wsj article is an absolute joke.
Posted by gthog61
Irving, TX
Member since Nov 2009
71001 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:24 am to
and I have heard people refer to the NES side of the WSJ as "conservative"

That is a sign that they do not know what they are talking about.
Posted by mightyMick
Member since Aug 2018
3067 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:30 am to
It never ceases to amaze me just how oblivious progs are to their hypocrisy. They act as if it just doesn't exist. That why this clown Cotton embarrassed was so boldly trying to make his point. It never occurs to him that he was doing the same thing he accused the NY Post of doing.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:43 am to
Best part was watching Cotton patiently giving that little soy more and more rope to hang himself with and then pulling the lever to the gallow trapdoor.

[GULP]
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112460 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 10:48 am to
Rush mentioned Tom Cotton as a guy to watch running for President in 2024. The context was that Trump has reshaped the GOP. It will not go back to Bush, McCain, Romney type candidates. Cotton is impressive.
Posted by PhDoogan
Member since Sep 2018
14947 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:01 am to
I agree. I've been impressed with Josh Hawley as well.
Posted by Taxing Authority
Houston
Member since Feb 2010
57222 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:09 am to
“I want to make two points here...” idiot. You’re the “journalist” you’re supposed to e interviewing someone, not advocating positions. Dumbass.

And here’s a point for you.. with zero corroboration “journalists” plastered the media with the fake “losers” cometary comments for days on end.

You can’t have two sets of standards and claim the moral or ethical high ground.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21748 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:17 am to
quote:

WSJ is dancing around it. I’m not sure why. They said nothing in the “corporate records” indicated Joe was part of it.



That was the most bizarre, weakest attempt at cover from a supposedly business-centric publication I've ever seen in my life.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54207 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:23 am to
quote:

Cotton and Harris are the two most dangerous people in Congress.


Please explain to me how my senator is dangerous. An inquiring mind would like to know.
Posted by Homesick Tiger
Greenbrier, AR
Member since Nov 2006
54207 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:27 am to
quote:

“I want to make two points here...” idiot. You’re the “journalist” you’re supposed to e interviewing someone, not advocating positions. Dumbass.


My thought exactly. "there are no reports" - well then get off your arse and do your own homework.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
21748 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:29 am to
quote:

well then get off your arse


I guarantee you they've gotten off their arse. There are teams of "reporters" furiously trying to prove that none of this is real, but they're just screwed because it is real.
Posted by corneredbeast
02134
Member since Sep 2008
2164 posts
Posted on 10/24/20 at 11:40 am to
quote:

And here’s a point for you.. with zero corroboration “journalists” plastered the media with the fake “losers” cometary comments for days on end.


And Hiden is using that line today in PA, with no one fact checking him on it. We have no press.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram