- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Watch closely for Barack Hussein Obama's fingerprints on this scandal
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:50 am
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:50 am
LINK
1.He instructed the IRS to attack freedom loving American citizens.
2.Obama who claimed he knew nothing about Clinton's e-mail server, but used a pseudonym to send her e-mails on that server.
3. During his eight year regime, he successfully weaponized many government institutions to attack anyone the Deep State feels is a threat to their political philosophy. We are just uncovering this scheme.
quote:
OBAMA: I guarantee that there is no political influence in any investigation conducted by the Justice Department, or the FBI, not just in this case, but in any case.
1.He instructed the IRS to attack freedom loving American citizens.
2.Obama who claimed he knew nothing about Clinton's e-mail server, but used a pseudonym to send her e-mails on that server.
3. During his eight year regime, he successfully weaponized many government institutions to attack anyone the Deep State feels is a threat to their political philosophy. We are just uncovering this scheme.
13
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:55 am to Da Sheik
The DNC was president for eight years. He was just the mouthpiece.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:58 am to geauxnavybeatbama
The used him like a slave
Only he got paid well and got Michael out of the deal
Only he got paid well and got Michael out of the deal
This post was edited on 2/4/18 at 8:58 am
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:58 am to Da Sheik
You got the prog filth downvotes in a hurry. 
Posted on 2/4/18 at 8:59 am to Da Sheik
Ive said it here numerous times. There’s no doubt in my mind that this all ends up at his feet. There is no way he was not involved in this scandal.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:01 am to LSU Patrick
The truth hurts, MAGA
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:01 am to Da Sheik
Did Obama know that Trump was being "wiretapped"? What did he know, and when did He know it? Will He tell us?
"If the glove don't fit...gotta acquit".
"If the glove don't fit...gotta acquit".
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:10 am to Da Sheik
"The Fish Stinks from the Head"
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:10 am to Da Sheik
quote:
2.Obama who claimed he knew nothing about Clinton's e-mail server, but used a pseudonym to send her e-mails on that server.
This is the key for why Comey let Hillary go.
quote:
Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account.
These emails must have involved some classified information, given the nature of consultations between presidents and secretaries of state, the broad outlines of Obama’s own executive order defining classified intelligence (see EO 13526, section 1.4), and the fact that the Obama administration adamantly refused to disclose the Clinton–Obama emails. If classified information was mishandled, it was necessarily mishandled on both ends of these email exchanges.
If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton–Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges.
That is why such an indictment of Hillary Clinton was never going to happen. The latest jaw-dropping disclosures of text messages between FBI agent Peter Strzok and his paramour, FBI lawyer Lisa Page, illustrate this point.
Understanding why Hillary wasn't indicted - National Review
This post was edited on 2/4/18 at 9:29 am
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:20 am to Da Sheik
How often does it come down to "Liar or Idiot" with these pols?
They either lie about their knowledge of wrongdoing, or plead they were too stupid to see what was going on.
They either lie about their knowledge of wrongdoing, or plead they were too stupid to see what was going on.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:25 am to Da Sheik
That big eared cock gobbler needs to be put before a firing squad.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:27 am to Da Sheik
Put a Chicago political boss in the wh, get Chicago style political chicanery in dc.
Dems can't admit it because Obama is their quasi black immigrant golden child
Dems can't admit it because Obama is their quasi black immigrant golden child
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:28 am to Da Sheik
Nothing will happen to Obama and you know it.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:39 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Dems can't admit it because Obama is their quasi black immigrant golden child
exactly, he is their messiah,
their chosen one who shall not have a single hair upon his head touched.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:39 am to Da Sheik
quote:
1.He instructed the IRS to attack freedom loving American citizens.
Not proven that he did that.
2.Obama who claimed he knew nothing about Clinton's e-mail server, but used a pseudonym to send her e-mails on that server.
Not proven that he knew she used her own, hidden server.
3. During his eight year regime, he successfully weaponized many government institutions to attack anyone the Deep State feels is a threat to their political philosophy.
Not proven. Yet.
We are just uncovering this scheme.
The first (half) black president is not going to be charged.
The rioting in the streets will make the Watts riots and Baltimore riots look like a church picnic by the lake in comparison. There would have be proof so irrefutable to convict him of a crime so heinous that the shredding of our society is worth it. That's not going to happen.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:52 am to HubbaBubba
It would only take only email. It would have to be a good one though. Like a pizza party
Posted on 2/4/18 at 9:56 am to geauxnavybeatbama
quote:
he DNC was president for eight years. He was just the mouthpiece.
I believe this and have been saying it since he was elected.
Look at the impossibility that a first term junior Senator that had been involved in nothing of major importance in his career assembles an election team that displaces the Clinton Political Machine. My question is who is/was running the DNC? There are only a few possibilities:
The Obamas - no
The Clintons - dont think so
Wasserman-Schulz or Barzile - nope
Major US Dem Donors - somewhat
Soros led Progressive group - most likely
This theory if accepted means that the US has been partially taken over by foreign interests. Also you can see that Soros has also through back channel financial backings has corrupted prominent Repubs as well. This question was raised a few yrs back when Soros' political donations were analyzed.
Look at the behavior of many of the old guard Repubs like McCain, Graham, and Romney. In the past I have supported all of these folks until I have seen them bury their party's initiatives when it came time to vote.
This post was edited on 2/4/18 at 9:57 am
Posted on 2/4/18 at 10:01 am to Nado Jenkins83
quote:The problem, as we all know, this evidence would never see the light of day. The ONLY evidence (via email, let's say) that might see the light of day, would be him ordering the execution of Seth Rich.
It would only take only email. It would have to be a good one though. Like a pizza party
Other than something like that, I don't see it, unless his mother Rose from the grave and testified he never was a U.S. citizen.
Posted on 2/4/18 at 10:09 am to Da Sheik
Valerie Jarrett, with BHOs blessing.
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News