- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Wa State AG Warns Journalists Investigating Somali Daycares is Potential Hate Crime Charge
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:56 am to RelentlessAnalysis
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:56 am to RelentlessAnalysis
Neither does a journalist from CNN, but it really doesn’t matter. These businesses were shuttered during their own stated business hours. All this is happening in the backdrop of fraud convictions in these very programs in this same community. Then some were caught lying about it all.
To say that’s not relevant and extremely suspicious is just fricking stupid. The entire country is talking about it.
To say that’s not relevant and extremely suspicious is just fricking stupid. The entire country is talking about it.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:57 am to Placekicker
quote:
He mentioned that Shirley was not a Journalist.
Did he? Or was he referencing the people trying to recreate the virality that Shirley was able to accomplish? Which post specifically references Shirley?
quote:
So, I presented an example of what Liberals think passes for journalism.
Irrelevant whataboutism that nobody has defended. Your windmill.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 11:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Irrelevant whataboutism that nobody has defended. Your windmill.
More projection from SFP…
This post was edited on 1/1/26 at 12:00 pm
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:01 pm to Placekicker
SFP is perfectly consistent because not defending CNN is the same as attacking tf out of Nick Shirley. 
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
BigMuffaletta ... too dumb to understand both what's being discussed and the words you type
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:04 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
SFP is perfectly consistent because not defending CNN is the same as attacking tf out of Nick Shirley.
Who is attacking Nick Shirley? Go search the thread for references to "Shirley".
Because the only people who keep bringing him up are the MAGA people, not those who clearly were discussing those trying to mimic Shirley
See:
quote:
hese vloggers trying to mimic Shirley are not proving they're not daycare centers.
LINK
The Strawman is strong.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That doesn't mean that harassment-related crimes aren't able to be prosecuted there
I mean I guess in a world where men can be women, a business having a someone come and inquire about their services can be harassment.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:07 pm to CleverUserName
quote:NO ONE is arguing against continuing investigation.
What did Woodward and Bernstein have to go on? A simple robbery? "Hey you two!! Leave it to the police!!"
The question presented ITT is whether banging on doors and otherwise harassing people constitutes a valid, journalistic investigation ... and whether it violates OTHER laws designed to protect members of the public.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:08 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Then he's retarded because this has always been the domain of courts.
Which you continue to ignore yourself as the status of citizen journalists. I've posted it twice already.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:09 pm to Meauxjeaux
Who was that journalist from Politico on X who said that Somalis should use stand your ground laws against people like Shirley?
That’s real journalism!
That’s real journalism!
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:11 pm to Vacherie Saint
We have idiots claiming harassment and badgering for simply showing up at a fake daycare and asking questions.
A small step and they will justify shooting someone.
Because they aren't a member of the MSM who happen to have lied to the public for decades
A small step and they will justify shooting someone.
Because they aren't a member of the MSM who happen to have lied to the public for decades
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:13 pm to Placekicker
quote:And after that telephone call, a REAL journalist sits down at her computer and spends twenty hours doing actual research.quote:Yet, a CNN reporter who calls up a Mn Somali Daycare and asks if it’s legit and takes them at their word IS considered journalism??
very yahoo with a cell phone cam is not a "journalist."
Rando with cell phone cam posts a video 30 seconds later.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:14 pm to Meauxjeaux
quote:
having a someone come and inquire about their services can be harassment.
It's going to be fact-dependent and a case by case.
If the "journalist" asks a question, is told to leave, and leaves, then no.
If they persist, then it opens the door depending on their actions.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:15 pm to RelentlessAnalysis
His actions are no different than any other investigative journalists’ actions.
You insisting its ackshywully harassment doesn’t change that. Unless you want to charge them all investigative journalists with hate crimes?
You insisting its ackshywully harassment doesn’t change that. Unless you want to charge them all investigative journalists with hate crimes?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:15 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:NO ONE here is saying that.
To say that’s not relevant and extremely suspicious is just fricking stupid
The issue ITT is whether the state AG was out-of-bounds when warning the random TikTok yahoos that they better not cross the line and break the law.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:16 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
quote:
How could it not be the latter?
It may be your usage, but you can't just go bust into a home daycare and expect to be permitted in for about 50 reasons. The security and privacy of the children alone should make this obvious
New year, but same ole idiocy from you!
Your a fricking goofball.
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:17 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
His actions are no different than any other investigative journalists’ actions.
But, again, that investigative journalist likely has a lot more meat on the bone.
Put it this way. Assume that these were legit home daycares. Would you consider it journalism if the crazies kept interfering with their business/caring for children if they had nothing other than race to fall back on?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:18 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Would you consider it journalism if the crazies kept interfering with their business/caring for children
How much time is he spending at these businesses?
Posted on 1/1/26 at 12:18 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:I cannot speak for SFP, buy I have had positive things to say about Shirley in another thread.
SFP is perfectly consistent because not defending CNN is the same as attacking tf out of Nick Shirley
He is nudging the line between internet glory seeking and actual journalism, but I think he manages to stay on the correct side of that line.
Unfortunately, it appears that many of his imitators are walking right over that line without a second glance.
Popular
Back to top



1




