- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U.S. and Israel reach joint plan to counter Iran
Posted on 12/29/17 at 9:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
Posted on 12/29/17 at 9:23 pm to StraightCashHomey21
quote:
Iran is a regional threat. Saudi and the money they pump around the world for Wahhabism is a full on Trojan horse to establish a Muslim world.
Those guys are dead, arrested or broke.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:41 pm to dr smartass phd
quote:
Those guys are dead, arrested or broke.
I don't think you quite understand, Saudi Arabia is Wahhabism. They're one in the same, and to remove Wahhabism from public and private life, that's ... that's a tall order. It would take a century, and perhaps more.
Ideas, culture, they're incredibly resilient things. You can't just stamp them out.
You'll eventually see a rather nasty reaction from the true believers, they'll topple the king for his heresy.
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 10:46 pm
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:45 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
They have us over a barrel. The people who say, let Israel deal with it are right about one thing, Israel CAN deal with it. But it's HOW they'd have to deal with it that would cause them to reconsider our being involved. Nobody wants mushroom clouds and Israel won't have much choice if it gets too bad. For them, this is about extinction. They're not walking into the showers passively this time.
The Israelis have always reacted to threats with immediate force. They prize quick violent action, so their inaction on issues like Hezbollah and Iran should be telling.
They don't have an answer.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 10:52 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
They don't have an answer.
Was Obama wrong to try and entreat with Iran?
Posted on 12/30/17 at 12:01 am to 14&Counting
quote:
Was Obama wrong to try and entreat with Iran?
Look at the outcome of his “work” (or lack there of) and tell us.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 5:52 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Joint plan with American lives and tax dollars... greatest ally ever.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:58 am to Lima Whiskey
Take a look at the massive protests going on in Iran. The people are demanding that support for foreign wars (Houthis, Hezbollah, and Syria) cease and urges that the clerics and president to step down.
If this protest, which has the makings of turning into a revolt, succeeds, suddenly, Israel won’t have to worry about Iran backing Israel’s enemies anymore. Hezbollah, cut off financially from their drug operations in the U.S. and from their puppet masters in the East suddenly becomes a much less formidable foe; same with the Houthis in Yemen.
LINK
If this protest, which has the makings of turning into a revolt, succeeds, suddenly, Israel won’t have to worry about Iran backing Israel’s enemies anymore. Hezbollah, cut off financially from their drug operations in the U.S. and from their puppet masters in the East suddenly becomes a much less formidable foe; same with the Houthis in Yemen.
LINK
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 10:00 am
Posted on 12/30/17 at 3:27 pm to 14&Counting
I don’t think we got much out of that deal.
I don’t view Iran as a direct threat to our security, but you have to worry about the changing power balance in the region. There will be conflict, and that could be nasty.
That’s something we need to be watchful of.
It doesn’t mean we need to get involved though.
I don’t view Iran as a direct threat to our security, but you have to worry about the changing power balance in the region. There will be conflict, and that could be nasty.
That’s something we need to be watchful of.
It doesn’t mean we need to get involved though.
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 3:31 pm
Posted on 12/30/17 at 3:29 pm to kingbob
Do the protests represent Iran as a whole? Or a small section of the urban population?
How broad is appeal?
How broad is appeal?
Posted on 12/30/17 at 3:31 pm to Lima Whiskey
I'm not sure at this point, but it seems to be pretty wide spread in a lot of cities.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 5:58 pm to kingbob
Think of America, for comparison, and the counter Trump protests.
Are they a serious threat?
Are they a serious threat?
Posted on 12/30/17 at 6:19 pm to Lima Whiskey
Iran’s Republican Guard and Secret Police will squash this. These protests, and the crack down, may breed an insurgent movement but it’s years away from being any position to oppose the power of this regime. Hopefully, we can provide some covert “help’in” if a movement starts.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 6:24 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
I like Israel.

Posted on 12/30/17 at 8:57 pm to ABearsFanNMS
The most successful example of this is probably OTPOR in Serbia and our efforts to topple Milosevic.
OTPOR had no idea that they were working for us, nor did the public.
Iran was never my thing, but I would be wary of interfering.
I don’t know what we’d get out of it - I don’t see where Iran poses a threat to us. And what happens if it blows up in our face? I see a potential downside without much of an upside.
I would let them sort it out themselves, on their own terms.
Time and the burden of govenance has tempered the Mullahs fervor. That process will continue.
OTPOR had no idea that they were working for us, nor did the public.
Iran was never my thing, but I would be wary of interfering.
I don’t know what we’d get out of it - I don’t see where Iran poses a threat to us. And what happens if it blows up in our face? I see a potential downside without much of an upside.
I would let them sort it out themselves, on their own terms.
Time and the burden of govenance has tempered the Mullahs fervor. That process will continue.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:06 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
As for nukes. Israel isn’t going to use them in Lebanon
They're not going to have to. Hezbollah is toast. It's just a matter of time.
The Lebanese army was just approved to receive Bradley fighting vehicles from the U.S. This is big and just another nail in the Hezbollah coffin.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:12 pm to bencoleman
quote:
The Lebanese army was just approved to receive Bradley fighting vehicles from the U.S. This is big and just another nail in the Hezbollah coffin.
Ah. You’re just trolling.
And I was being thick.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:13 pm to bencoleman
quote:
The Lebanese army was just approved to receive Bradley fighting vehicles from the U.S. This is big and just another nail in the Hezbollah coffin.
If Iran falls, Hezbollah is cut off from their biggest financial/military backer. Then, if the Lebanese army is suddenly getting outfitted with better weapons, they can retake control of the country.
With Iran no longer supporting proxies abroad, Saudi Arabia cracking down on Wahhabists, and Hezbollah neutered, Fatah and Hamas will not survive much longer.
It looks like Israel has check and mate.
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 9:14 pm
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:17 pm to kingbob
quote:
If Iran falls, Hezbollah is cut off from their biggest financial/military backer. Then, if the Lebanese army is suddenly getting outfitted with better weapons, they can retake control of the country.
This is something you want to be true.
It doesn’t make true though, and your chain of thinking relies on a number of ludicrous assumptions.
The Lebanese Army isn’t an army and it’s a hell of a lot more likely to shoot at the IDF than it is at Hezbollah.
Bradley’s would also be of little to no help in fighting Hezbollah.
Ultimately, they’d just be pretty toys in the hands of the Lebanese.
And that’s the thing about military aid, men fight for ideas, and all the military to military training, all the western weapons in the world, it doesn’t make up for that.
We may want the Lebanese to fight Hezbollah. That’s moronic. Why on earth would we want to restart the civil war. But that’s what we want, not what they want.
And so they won’t.
What would they fight for? Their sect, their faith, and perhaps for the Levantine people.
They do not like their neighbors to the south. So they might fight against them.
This post was edited on 12/30/17 at 9:23 pm
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:20 pm to Lima Whiskey
sted December 4, 2017
The Donald Trump administration is pouring new weapons into Lebanon despite US budgetary uncertainty and political turmoil in Beirut
Also light attack helicopters.
Hezbollah is finished. Their money and a source for weapons just dried up. All they will have left is money extorted from South America.
The Donald Trump administration is pouring new weapons into Lebanon despite US budgetary uncertainty and political turmoil in Beirut
Also light attack helicopters.
Hezbollah is finished. Their money and a source for weapons just dried up. All they will have left is money extorted from South America.
Posted on 12/30/17 at 9:24 pm to Lima Whiskey
quote:
This is something you want to be true
No it's fact. Hezbollah will have no money or weapons now explain how you think they'll continue to be effective. The answer is they won't be. They are done.
Popular
Back to top



1




