Started By
Message

re: Updated report - shooting at Brown University, 11 casualties

Posted on 12/14/25 at 12:23 am to
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
56871 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 12:23 am to
quote:

The argument against gun control is not that it’s impossible, it’s that they’ll just use other weapons if they can’t get guns. Also, the second amendment argument.


The second amendment is a pretty strong argument.

quote:

Obviously if guns are allowed in the surrounding city and countryside they won’t be able to stop someone from carrying one onto campus.


Like Mexico and the US?
Posted by Rebel
Graceland
Member since Jan 2005
141466 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 12:32 am to
quote:

The second amendment is a pretty strong argument.


I love 2A. It’s the ultimate trump card.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Member since Apr 2024
8199 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:01 am to
quote:

Europe has virtually eliminated guns, so I don’t know why you think this is clever.


So has Australia

Your turn.
Posted by JackieTreehorn
Member since Sep 2013
34934 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:17 am to
CNN’s description of the perp was a “30-something year old man wearing dark clothing.” Lmao
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42443 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 4:23 am to
I don’t understand your reply.

Explain
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80024 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 5:39 am to
Casualties are not necessarily deaths, people.


Correct.

Casualties = wounded + dead
Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
42443 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:10 am to
Hard to fathom how anyone can even make that mistake. Either you’ve got the person or you don’t.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52134 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:14 am to
quote:

Like Mexico and the US?

No, guns are legal here in the US. It would be more like Europe and the rest of the world.

I don’t know why some keep making the argument that gun control is not possible. It’s a foolish argument with the UK, Sweden, etcetera sitting right there as glaring cases in which it has worked totally. And if you rest this important case on foolish arguments you will eventually lose.
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Top of Texas
Member since Sep 2025
1323 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:31 am to
quote:

It’s a foolish argument with the UK, Sweden, etcetera sitting right there as glaring cases in which it has worked totally.


No, in the UK they just stab each other with knives and throw acid on people.

The UK did try do a #knifefree movement in 2019, but it was deemed racist because they used chicken boxes.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/special-knifefree-chicken-boxes-launched-across-the-country

Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
80024 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:33 am to
quote:

I don’t know why some keep making the argument that gun control is not possible.


Some limited effect can happen when you take enough freedom away.

The UK is seeing a rise in gun crime and smuggling. Islamist love them some guns and are finding ways to get them in.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52134 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:35 am to
quote:

No, in the UK they just stab each other

Yeah, no shite! And THAT’s a valid argument. But saying it’s not possible to control guns is a foolish one.
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Top of Texas
Member since Sep 2025
1323 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:36 am to
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Top of Texas
Member since Sep 2025
1323 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:43 am to
quote:

But saying it’s not possible to control guns is a foolish one.


It is when we had a President import ten million plus third world savages into our country with no vetting.

Criminals will find ways to get guns or another weapon to accomplish their goal by any means necessary. Remove the ability for citizens to protect themself from criminals and crime and murder will rise.
Posted by FredBear
Georgia
Member since Aug 2017
16871 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:47 am to
quote:

But saying it’s not possible to control guns is a foolish one.



I'll consider giving up my right to own firearms when you give up your right to vote. Your rights are no more special or protected than mine are.
Posted by donRANDOMnumbers
Hub City
Member since Nov 2006
17357 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:48 am to
Weren’t the same countries as those.

If we were very homogeneous then this wouldn’t even need to be debated
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52134 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:49 am to
quote:

Remove the ability for citizens to protect themself from criminals and crime and murder will rise.

This is far from certain. My guess would be no short term effect on crime but a long term decline in crime. Certainly the UK and European countries have much lower crime rates than the US, but they started with a very different population, so it’s hard to tease out what caused what.

Whatever the effect on crime, the effect on government’s ability to tyrannize its citizens would be large. And that’s the effect that the we should have our eyes on.
Posted by Penrod
Member since Jan 2011
52134 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:53 am to
quote:

If we were very homogeneous then this wouldn’t even need to be debated

Yep.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
112546 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 6:55 am to
quote:

Certainly the UK and European countries have much lower crime rates than the US, but they started with a very different population, so it’s hard to tease out what caused what.


Here's a little hint...

Look at Europe's violent crime rates since they flung open their borders to the 3rd World. They're catching up to the USA with a quickness.
Posted by BoomerandSooner
Top of Texas
Member since Sep 2025
1323 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 7:00 am to
quote:

My guess would be no short term effect on crime but a long term decline in crime.


You guess? Let's look at the Aussies violent crime statistics. One of those "guns are bad countries."

https://www.statista.com/statistics/991098/australia-people-imprisoned-homicide/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/991191/australia-people-imprisoned-assault/

https://www.statista.com/statistics/991186/australia-people-imprisoned-sexual-assault/

You are wrong again. Shocker.


Posted by trinidadtiger
Member since Jun 2017
18741 posts
Posted on 12/14/25 at 7:13 am to
quote:

Whatever the effect on crime, the effect on government’s ability to tyrannize its citizens would be large. And that’s the effect that the we should have our eyes on.


Bingo. JP Morgan rule.....

The good and honorable reason: stop "gun" violence
The real reason: subjugate the populace

Want proof, a Freudian slip, when someone says the real reason out loud. President Joe Biden "These MAGA folks have guns, we have f-16s". Why would he ever make such a statement unless they were fearful that the populace had guns to defend themselves against tyranny?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram