- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:34 am to Kjnstkmn
And Russia looked at this shelling and suddenly realized that, as luck would have it, it had amassed 200,000 troops right along the border, all equipped for combat...
What good fortune for Mother Russia!
What good fortune for Mother Russia!
This post was edited on 6/18/22 at 8:38 am
Posted on 6/18/22 at 8:35 am to Goonie02
"This conflict has been going on since 2014."
About those early shellings against Russian citizens there.
It couldn't possibly have been to foment more strife in an already existing powder-keg to open the floodgates for Ras-Putin finally to do what he's wanted for awhile.
But Bolsheviks would never involve themselves in something so underhanded and machiavellian.
Just one aspect has never been mentioned on this pro-Ras-Putin site.
Which is, that the Ukraine Constitution has had in it provisions for eventually joining NATO for some time. So why did Ras-Putin wait all this time to make a move on them.
Part of it is the pathetic image of weakness being telecasted like a neon sign by this Biden Junta.
Among the other many possibilities is that he wants to be remembered as a Russian Bolshevik leader who began the process for eventually recovering those lost Soviet "republics." Or at least make it appear that way.
He made it plain and succinct from the onset that "this is not just about the Ukraine." How much more clear could he have been.
So on top of everything else, this black Russian Bolshevik is also an "irredentist." And a bloody one at that.
About those early shellings against Russian citizens there.
It couldn't possibly have been to foment more strife in an already existing powder-keg to open the floodgates for Ras-Putin finally to do what he's wanted for awhile.
But Bolsheviks would never involve themselves in something so underhanded and machiavellian.
Just one aspect has never been mentioned on this pro-Ras-Putin site.
Which is, that the Ukraine Constitution has had in it provisions for eventually joining NATO for some time. So why did Ras-Putin wait all this time to make a move on them.
Part of it is the pathetic image of weakness being telecasted like a neon sign by this Biden Junta.
Among the other many possibilities is that he wants to be remembered as a Russian Bolshevik leader who began the process for eventually recovering those lost Soviet "republics." Or at least make it appear that way.
He made it plain and succinct from the onset that "this is not just about the Ukraine." How much more clear could he have been.
So on top of everything else, this black Russian Bolshevik is also an "irredentist." And a bloody one at that.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:19 am to trinidadtiger
quote:
I think a fair analogy would be Crimea and the Donbas region. But in Donbas, taking control of them was not enough to provoke Russia so you started killing them.
So you’re saying the Donbas region and Crimea are Russian, and belong to Russia? And Ukraine having control of the Donbas region, wasn’t enough to start war with Russia, so they had to start killing pro Russian people in the east, to provoke Russia to go to war with them?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 9:56 am to sta4ever
quote:IOW, “we didn’t cross the border, the border crossed us”
It’s really like, if a bunch of Mexicans, decided that anything in Texas, south of San Antonio is theirs
quote:that would require defending the border with something more lethal than whip reins
So you’re telling me, if this were the case here in the US, that the US would be in the wrong, and are the ones who started war with Mexico?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:01 am to jackamo3300
JC. He’s not a Bolshevik. Those are the globalists he is fighting
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:14 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:There are a lot of terrible things you can call Putin, with ample justification.
He’s not a Bolshevik.
But Bolshevik is definitely NOT one of them. If anything, he’s an antii-Bolshevik.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:20 am to Kjnstkmn
Yeah I believe this Russia just massed a 100,000 plus soldiers on the border for shits and giggles.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 10:31 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Kind of like if we decided to use artillery on a majority Hispanic community near the border, Mexico wouldn’t take too kindly to it - but in this case it’s Russia and they don’t have to sit back and take it like Mexico would have to.
So Russia interfered in a internal Ukrainian issue and invaded Ukraine, got it.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 11:06 am to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
He's fighting the globalists.
Wouldn't mind knowing which of the participants in this is the preferred winner by Soros and the International Financial cartel he is the unofficial "bursar" for.
In the first Crimean War, the Rothschilds financed both sides. No way to lose like that.
What has changed since then.
Is any of the answer in that Hungary who got a good look at what Communists are during the Revolution, expelled them in 1919, and later purged Soros and his brood from their midst, just recently, is on edge about this incursion.
Are any of the other contiguous, relatively free states at all mobilizing - due to this move by the Poisoner.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 11:21 am to Ponchy Tiger
Zelensky had moved 125,000 troops to the Donbas border in early Feb. 2022, in preparation for a major military "Offensive" on the Donbass oblast', (region).
These people had voted to become independent of Ukraine by an overwhelming majority. We, the west, had allowed Ukraine to bomb these people relentlessly for 8 years. Referring to them as "Russian backed separatist", in an effort to shift blame to Russia Russia Russia.
In fact, we encouraged it. FACT!
No need for a link. Just use what I just wrote as your source. Seems no one checks any of the source material from the OP anyway.
Only question is WHY?
These people had voted to become independent of Ukraine by an overwhelming majority. We, the west, had allowed Ukraine to bomb these people relentlessly for 8 years. Referring to them as "Russian backed separatist", in an effort to shift blame to Russia Russia Russia.
In fact, we encouraged it. FACT!
No need for a link. Just use what I just wrote as your source. Seems no one checks any of the source material from the OP anyway.
Only question is WHY?
Posted on 6/18/22 at 12:04 pm to Kjnstkmn
Don’t forget Ukraine are the aggressors in this situation. Russia is just trying to defend itself.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 1:39 pm to FearlessFreep
quote:
There are a lot of terrible things you can call Putin, with ample justification.
But Bolshevik is definitely NOT one of them. If anything, he’s an antii-Bolshevik.
So he's not a Bolshevik - just an imperialistic, amoral autocrat with no coherent ideology who knows how to draw just enough from pre-Czarist Russian cultural tenets to endear himself to the people, while still remaining in accordance with the Bolshevik Code.
So is there a distinction here without a difference?
The thing he unavoidably shares with Bolshevism is his willingness to spill innocent blood.
The Bolshevik Code
Putin’s character and his core beliefs, ingrained in his world view and behavior, stem from a conflicted mélange of Tsarist authoritarianism and Marxism-Leninism. In his struggle for legitimacy and power Putin reflects the same preoccupations that shaped the psychology and history of old Russia.
Under Putin, just as under the Soviet system, when the communist leadership declared a new reality all the forces of the government, police , military and propaganda coordinated their efforts to create a new political line. Putin’s justification for the invasion of Crimea and eastern Ukraine fits this pattern as do the words and actions of his Foreign Minister, Sergei Lavrov.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 2:14 pm to mmcgrath
quote:
Well known propagandist for Putin.
A guy who bought into the muh Russia hoax for years probably shouldn’t be making judgment calls on what is and isn’t propaganda.
Posted on 6/18/22 at 5:28 pm to Mickey Goldmill
quote:
So they didn’t send artillery or troops into Russia, but they started the war with Russia?
You have tu enter a country to start a war with them? hmmm
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:37 am to jackamo3300
quote:Yes, thank God we Americans only spill guilty blood.
The thing he unavoidably shares with Bolshevism is his willingness to spill innocent blood.
Posted on 6/20/22 at 12:44 am to TigerAxeOK
quote:
It was a genuine, glabalist-backed color revolution. Sadly, most people still don't realize this.
This ^^^
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News