1
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: UK RAF bomber suspects out on bail already
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:04 pm to Bunk Moreland
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:04 pm to Bunk Moreland
Thanks, Bunk. That's lining up with everything I'm seeing.
I DID some research though and found out the reason for the names not being released isn't nefarious or indicative of any particular theory...Brits are Muzzie lovers who want to shield these dirty rotten Muzzies OR a false flag.
Unless and until someone is charged in the UK, their names aren't generally released.
Why haven't they released the occupations of the Terror 5? My guess is because they have ties to the UK military. The Brits also haven't released what the "stringent conditions of bail" are. Are they even prohibited from leaving the UK?
Watching interviews with the UK (Ukraine flag-wearing) Secretary of Defence today, he seemed pretty clearly committed to covering up whatever happened at RAF Fairford.
Spoiler Alert: these 5 will never be charged because their identities can't be ever be released.
In the meantime, the MIC can do the typical fear-mongering routine speculating about whether or not these unidentified terrorists were acting on behalf of Iran...to do what exactly???
I DID some research though and found out the reason for the names not being released isn't nefarious or indicative of any particular theory...Brits are Muzzie lovers who want to shield these dirty rotten Muzzies OR a false flag.
Unless and until someone is charged in the UK, their names aren't generally released.
Why haven't they released the occupations of the Terror 5? My guess is because they have ties to the UK military. The Brits also haven't released what the "stringent conditions of bail" are. Are they even prohibited from leaving the UK?
Watching interviews with the UK (Ukraine flag-wearing) Secretary of Defence today, he seemed pretty clearly committed to covering up whatever happened at RAF Fairford.
Spoiler Alert: these 5 will never be charged because their identities can't be ever be released.
In the meantime, the MIC can do the typical fear-mongering routine speculating about whether or not these unidentified terrorists were acting on behalf of Iran...to do what exactly???
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:17 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
The facts don't match this being an actual terrorist incident.
Have you told the Secretary of State?
Marco Rubio has blamed the incident at RAF Fairford on a "foreign actor" as he warned that "a lot more news" about the circumstances will come to light in the near future.
This was from this evening, btw
This post was edited on 9/28/26 at 9:22 pm
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:37 pm to G2160
quote:
Have you told the Secretary of State?
Thanks, G2160. I hadn't seen that. Rubio certainly is more careful in what he has to say.
Why would he lie about this detail, though?
quote:
"I know a lot of people are disturbed by the news that some of these people have been released on bail...
Only 5 people were arrested. All 5 have been released on bail. What's this "some" crap?
Foreign involvement to do WHAT though?
Anyhow, I stand by my statement. I think Trump was making it up as to the US already investigating the 5. The proof will be when these 5 are never charged with acts of terrorism.
Thanks again for the heads up. I will look to see if I can find the actual interview with Rubio.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:45 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
Why haven't they released the occupations of the Terror 5? My guess is because they have ties to the UK military.
Based on what?
quote:
stringent conditions of bail" are
Well, stringent conditions of bail let rape gangs operate for decades.
quote:
the MIC can do the typical fear-mongering routine speculating about whether or not these unidentified terrorists were acting on behalf of Iran...to do what exactly???
The MIC basically doesn't exist in the UK, as evidenced by their 3 operational frigates. But what does exist is their Muslim apologist bullshite, from London to Glasgow.
Who gives a shite if they were acting on behalf of Iran, or the Salafists, the Sunnis, Al Qaeda, Al-Shabab, the Houthis, the Muslim drug gangs in Brussels or Paris?
Posted on 9/28/26 at 9:48 pm to G2160
quote:
Have you told the Secretary of State?
I found the interview with Rubio on Hannity. He characterizes what happened at RAF Fairford as, "I THINK, a serious threat."
He doesn't reveal evidence of any serious event or any foreign involvement. Maybe he will. To me it still seems like free beer tomorrow. Still confident that the 5 won't be charged with terrorism.
Hannity-Super Tough Interview with Rubio
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:15 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
The MIC basically doesn't exist in the UK
Fair point, but I think the weaponized intelligence portion exists there. They need to justify their budgets.
quote:
Why haven't they released the occupations of the Terror 5? My guess is because they have ties to the UK military.
That's why I said "guess." Given the terrorism laws in the UK, it makes more sense to me that these guys were part of a false flag than it does an actual terrorist plot. The most likely people to man a false flag would be military men.
Maybe our government will actually produce credible evidence that this was a serious terrorist plot. I will be happy to eat crow then.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:21 pm to LemmyLives
quote:
Well, stringent conditions of bail let rape gangs operate for decades.
My point was that the Brits seemed intent on convincing their people that the situation was safe because "stringent conditions" had been placed on the possible terrorists.
Seems weird that the authorities wouldn't give reassuring details about those conditions. I suspect that if they did, obvious questions would arise... "Are they allowed to work? What occupations do these men have?"
It would be awfully embarrassing if the answer were "they work for the Ministry of Defence."
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:27 pm to SouthEasternKaiju
quote:
So yo believe the same British government that helped manufacture the Steele dossier intent on getting Trump removed from office? The same government that puts its own people in jail while handing out free phones, checks & housing to illegals who have no care to assimilate.
I'm no fan of the Brits for all those reasons. I have just never seen them shy of charging people with terrorism.
Posted on 9/28/26 at 10:34 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I have just never seen them shy of charging people with terrorism
Until they are Muslim leaning.....the UK is done. They won't charge them, because it would be discremitory.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News