re: UAP /paranormal primer: essential information for what is to come

quote:

---

The most disturbing idea embraced by the UFO cheerleaders isn’t that life exists elsewhere in the universe—which seems likely—or that they may visit us. It’s that aliens are a Jesus stand-in. They are our saviors. They and their civilizations are full of beneficent understanding and sympathy for humanity.

---

quote:

---

UAPs and Alien “Gods” 2016
by Linda Moulton Howe

“We are part of a symbiotic relationship with something which disguises itself as an extra-terrestrial invasion so as not to alarm us.” - Terence McKenna, Author, Food of the Gods

“I was told that there are numerous E. T. ‘gods’ fighting amongst themselves and they are interjecting themselves into human affairs. I am being told that a lot of this is being kept secret because we are trying not to initiate a conflict with ‘an adversary that we poorly understand.’” - Tom DeLonge, co-author, Sekret Machines: Chasing Shadows © March 2016, collaborating with 10 U. S. military and intelligence advisers on E. T. facts

---

quote:

---

May 28, 2016 Encinitas, California - The United States entered World War II in December 1941, after Japan bombed Pearl Harbor, Hawaii. Our other enemy was Germany’s Adolph Hitler and his Nazi Schutzstaffel, also known as the “S.S.,” a paramilitary protection squad for Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, known as the Nazis. Hitler’s stated goal was to annihilate the Jewish population on Earth and take over the planet with an Aryan race of blond, blue-eyed beings referred to as Nordics.


It is further alleged that a sinister Alien Force was behind Hitler and the Nazis and continued insidious infiltrations after World War II when the United States authorized Project PAPERCLIP to bring hundreds of German rocket scientists into U. S. military and aerospace companies. Once an enemy, those German scientists were embraced inside America to create a United States nuclear weapons program and to get America to the moon in a program called Apollo.

Many insights about that historic schizophrenia have been released in the past six months in two books, allegedly with approval by military and intelligence operatives behind the scenes. One book is firsthand non-fiction; the other is fiction-based-on-fact. Both have the same theme: U. S. military intelligence during and after World War II became conscious of a powerful alien presence that emerged from Earth’s oceans and seas, from inside mountains and from the miles-deep ice of Antarctica.

---

quote:

---

Tonight I’ll begin about all this with the recent fiction-based-on-fact book and follow in the second half-hour with an engineer insider’s non-fiction. Two months ago in March 2016, a large 675-page book entitled Sekret Machines: Chasing Shadows was released. The co-authors are Tom DeLonge and A. J. Hartley. The word “Sekret” is spelled with a “k” instead of a “c” echoing the “k” added to the word magic long ago for serious communion with other dimensions. Then there is the U. S. government’s changing the “g” in magic to a “j” for TOP SECRET MAJIC classification on UFO and E. T. -related documents. And Russians and Germans insert “k”s in words like A-m-e-r-i-K-a and politiK.

---

quote:

---

41-year-old Tom DeLonge was born and raised in San Diego, California, and became the guitarist and co-lead vocalist for the American rock band Blink-182 in the 1990s. Currently he is guitarist and lead vocalist of the rock band Angels & Airwaves. On the dust jacket of his Sekret Machines, Tom writes about UFO, E.T. and “alien gods” after collaboration with a group of ten advisers from military and intelligence agencies. On the book’s dust jacket Tom wrote: “This first novel in our trilogy sets up important events that had their genesis as far back as World War II and continue into the present day. ... I know it seems unbelievable, but it’s all, and always, a true story. That is what fiction is for: to tell the truth.”

One truth, say his advisers, is that the alien presence is an existential risk — meaning, life is not guaranteed for humans — and an extinction event could be triggered by unfriendly aliens to deliberately wipe out Homo sapiens sapiens. So, now is a crucial time for humanity to learn that we are not alone in this universe and that friendly and unfriendly Others have been interacting with this planet for millions of years — some even dominating humans as “alien gods” of Greece, India, the Yucatan, Peru, Mesopotamia, Atlantis and around the world for eons.

---

quote:

---

YOUR ADVISORS USE THE TERM ‘THE OTHERS’? Yes. In my communications with certain people within my advisory group, it is referred to as The Others. The Others makes a lot of sense because the first thing that people need to realize about the UFO phenomenon is that it’s an Intelligence that’s here, has always been here. And I think calling them The Others makes a lot more sense because they are in our oceans, they are on our moon, they might be underground in certain places. So, you’re talking about the Other groups of intelligences that are here on the planet with us. AND YOU HAVE ATTRIBUTED ‘OTHERS’ TO GODS WITH A LITTLE G. CAN YOU PLEASE GO INTO THAT NOW? All the different areas of the world have different stories of gods. And I call that the little ‘g.’ These are beings that have god-like powers that are meddling in human affairs, but they are not what God is. The idea of whatever the Big G God that created the universe — whatever Force of Nature that might be — is different. I was told that there are numerous ‘gods’ fighting amongst themselves and they are interjecting themselves into human affairs — that those myths are true. All those ancient stories, those are real. You look at a lot of the studies that you have done, Linda, and what people have followed over the past 30 to 40 years — some people who have worked in these facilities have all talked about ancient hieroglyphics being on these craft. And they look like ancient Greek. I am told that they are ancient Greek, that there is a major connection to the hardware that we have and the ancient Greek Gods.

---

quote:

---

The head of the Pentagon's now-defunct UFO program AATIP, Luis Elizondo, presented quite a soliloquy on the subject of ancient human history when asked in an interview how the public would react if they knew what he did about the phenomenon.

So this guy I respect tremendously. We had a conversation. He said you know, Lue, mankind has been around for a little while, and most of the time mankind has been around we’ve been smack in the middle of the food chain. We ate a lot of things and a lot of things ate us, and that’s just the bottom line.

About 70,000 years ago, something fundamentally changed. Something changed, and our species was instantly catapulted to the very top of our planet as far as predatory animals.

Now, all of a sudden, we became the most feared. We were the most lethal and the most successful. In fact, most of the large species that existed on this planet went extinct because of us, because we started eating all of them.

There were a couple of species that did very, very well with our immediate ascension. We brought a couple of species with us, the dog as an example. That species benefitted greatly from mankind’s ascension as the alpha predator and wound up succeeding as well, doing very well off of that. That changed the entire global landscape of the planet almost overnight. Large animals went extinct because of us.

What if it turns out that there’s another species that’s even higher on that ladder than we are? Do we need the social institutions that we have today? Will we need the governmental and religious organizations that we have today if it turns out there is something else, or someone else, that is technologically more advanced? And perhaps, from an evolutionary perspective, more advanced? Have we been wasting our time all this time? Or are we doing exactly what we’re supposed to be doing?

Does it turn out that mankind is, in fact, just another animal in the zoo? We thought of ourselves as the zookeeper before, but maybe we’re just another exhibit. What would that mean to us? When I say somber and sobering, I mean there’s going to come a point in this conversation where we are going to have to do a lot of reconciling with ourselves, whatever that means. From whatever philosophical view you have, this is going to impact every single one of us equally, yet differently, and I think that’s important.

---

quote:

---

Another fascinating finding about ancient hominins has also surfaced in recent days. This discovery shows that our ancestors had the cognitive capacity for seafaring half a million years ago, using evidence of sea levels in the Aegean Sea and comparing that data to fossil record dating.

Could hominins predating the very evolution of sapiens, sail? It's been suggested before. Now a new study supports the case that supposedly primitive hominins made short sea journeys around the Mediterranean Sea, and populated the Aegean Islands at least half a million years ago. That is well before the much-vaunted Homo sapiens was even a twinkle in the eye of natural selection.

The question of when humans, or their ancestors, gained the cognitive and technical ability to cross the seas has long been the subject of debate. For a while we thought that Sapiens was the only member of the Homo family to have the ability to sail the oceans, with modern humans first reaching Australia around 50,000 years ago. But that paradigm has been crumbling in recent years in the face of evidence suggesting that early hominins were much more advanced than previously thought and did in fact leave clues that they traveled to lands completely surrounded by water.

It is becoming increasingly apparent that we may have vastly underestimated the cognitive abilities of our ancient ancestors. This finding is especially interesting when it comes to certain historical aspects of the UFO phenomenon, as these discoveries are focused in the area around the Aegean Sea, specifically the Greek island of Crete.

---

quote:

---

How can we rule out the possibility of a breakaway, ancient, non-human hominin civilization when there is growing evidence to support our ancestors possessing cognitive abilities thought impossible just years ago?

Recently, Australian journalist Ross Coulthart's sources have told him the US Department of Defense is covering up just that.

The other side of this that is fascinating is I've been engaging with archaeologists and anthropologists who have talked to me about the implausibility of a lot of the modern explanations for some of the ancient buildings that exist on this planet, that do not fit within the known timeframes of human technology being developed.

Even some of the Egyptian pyramids could not possibly have been built within the timeframe that we've described because they were working with bronze axes, and you have almost laser beam accuracy in some of the buildings that were constructed.

Some of the people I've been talking to in the Pentagon told me that they think there is strong evidence to suggest that there was a previous civilization on this planet. One of the things that's been suggested to me is that there might have been a civilization that has shared this planet with us that has never left.

I don't know. As a journalist, I'm just listening and collating the information and assembling facts as I hear them.

These recent findings — that Homo naledi harnessed fire before humans and our ancestors set sail half a million years ago — appear to support the possibility of a more advanced ancient civilization predating the rise of our species, as suggested by Coulthart's sources.

---

quote:

---

One suggestion made by Elizondo, in the same interview quoted previously, could give us some insight into what to expect.

The host, Curt Jaimungal, asked him about physical signs that would show evidence of an advanced intelligent presence on our planet in ancient times. Curt was initially referring to megalithic constructs such as the pyramids or other potentially unknown structures on the moon, but Elizondo took the conversation down a different route when he suggested the most enduring method would be through our DNA.

What would last long enough for us to go back and say, “Wow, is this an indicator of alien life on this planet 100,000 years ago?” What would you have to achieve that, to accomplish that? It’s a lot harder than one might think. And then again, would you recognize it?

One might say well, DNA.

DNA is a perfect example if you wanted to do something that was enduring for humanity. That we could look back 100,000 years ago and say, “Yes, that was absolutely manipulated by an intelligent life form.”

Well, deoxyribonucleic acid may be one way to do it. You can put coding and sequencing in there that will perpetuate over time and yes, you’ll have some degradation over generations, but in essence, you could do something that way. And basically, it’s a biological marker, right?

So we have to be careful when we say we look for evidence because evidence isn’t just necessarily a spearhead found in the Big Horn Mountains from 11,000 tears ago. It’s not necessarily a pyramid sitting in the middle of the desert. It could be far more sophisticated than that. You said put it in orbit, right? Well, what if we put that, rather than orbit, we put it into the human body?

---

quote:

---

Are we really at the top of the food chain?

---

quote:

---

Have we been living alongside a more advanced non-human species, as historically demonstrated by Homo naledi?

---

quote:

---

Is there ancient knowledge or technology we are not privy to as a species?

---

quote:

---

Was our ancestor's DNA affected by a higher intelligence, directly or epigenetically through cultural guidance?

---

quote:

---

And, what would these answers mean for our future?

---

quote:

---

Christopher Mellon
15 hours ago
10 min read

Setting the Record Straight

---

quote:

---

I’m writing to correct the record after a series of misleading articles on the UAP issue by Holman Jenkins Jr. of the Wall Street Journal. Specifically, I want to correct Mr. Jenkins' assertion that: “The UFO commotion has largely been sustained by the U.S. defense establishment,” as well as his suggestion that interest in the UAP issue is the result of “...intelligence officials who think their job includes promoting false and tendentious information to the American public for their own purposes.” His claim that DoD has recently found conventional explanations for most of the hundreds of UAP reported by US military personnel is also dubious.

First of all, it is not clear to me what “commotion” Mr. Jenkins is referring to since the American press has of late been observing a near total blackout on coverage of the UAP issue. For example, last week President Biden signed into law unprecedented legislation regarding UAP that could conceivably reveal proof of an extraterrestrial presence on Earth. Yet, not a word of this incredible bipartisan effort has been reported by any of America’s leading networks or newspapers! So, to begin with, there is, if anything, a lack of UAP press coverage rather than a surplus of it.

Furthermore, what limited press coverage we’ve seen lately has been negative, seeking to belittle and discredit the UAP issue, especially the possibility that some UAP could represent alien technology. Examples of such reporting include: Mr. Jenkins recent articles at the Wall Street Journal; another op-ed in the Wall Street Journal by UAP skeptic Seth Shostak (which incidentally falsely claims astronomers never report UAP); and finally, a New York Times op-ed published by Julian Barnes in October claiming that anonymous DoD officials have found explanations for “most” recent UAP reports. Strangely, Mr. Barnes references the 144 military UAP incidents reported in a government report delivered in June 2021. He then mentions a subsequent Congressional hearing on the UAP issue in May of 2022. Yet, he somehow fails to mention that the DoD officials appearing at the Congressional hearing reported that the number of officially reported military UAP incidents had precipitously climbed to 400 from 144 in less than a year! Are Mr. Barnes and his anonymous DoD sources claiming that most of the 144 UAP incidents have been explained, or most of the 400? Are the anonymous officials leaking information to the New York Times the same people Mr. Jenkins claims are “..promoting false and tendentious information to the American public for their own purposes?” I cannot help wondering since we have no other recent examples of DoD or IC officials leaking UAP information to the press. In short, there is too little rather than too much “commotion” regarding UAP, and Mr. Jenkins has it backwards when it comes to the role of the defense establishment.

One of the things that most concerns me about recent press coverage of the UAP issue is that neither Mr. Jenkins nor Mr. Barnes nor Mr. Shostak seem to have done any serious UAP research before publishing their bold claims. In that regard, I contacted a number of military personnel involved in the Nimitz incident and other prominent military UAP cases and learned that none had been interviewed by Mr. Jenkins, Mr. Barnes, or Mr. Shostak. This is a glaring omission since their testimony forms the basis for Congress’ recent, deep engagement on the issue. Also, some of these cases are responsible for the perception that some UAP are not of human manufacture. The failure to interview these important military witnesses is also a major oversight because some of their accounts provide valid reasons to believe some UAP incidents involve technology that may not be of human origin.

---

quote:

---

Conclusion

This is an admittedly cursory and limited version of the recent history of the UAP issue based on the narrow window of my personal experience, but it should suffice to demonstrate Mr. Jenkins is wrong: There is little mainstream press coverage of the UAP issue; what little mainstream coverage we’ve seen lately has mostly been derogatory; and to the extent defense officials have involved, it has been to downplay and discredit the UAP issue rather than promote it. In other words, Mr. Jenkins commentary in the Wall Street Journal is highly inaccurate and misleading.

Mr. Jenkins also claims DoD has found conventional explanations for the hundreds of UAP incidents that have been identified over the last few years. These include numerous cases of Navy warships being swarmed by unidentified drone-like aircraft at sea, often for hours at a time, permitting the collection of detailed radar and optical data on the UAP. The Chinese seem logical suspects, and I will not be the least bit surprised if that proves to be the explanation for these incidents, but when I last checked the IC still had not confirmed a Chinese link to these incidents.

There have also been dozens of airspace violations at DoD training ranges in recent years; in some cases, entire military exercises have been canceled or rescheduled due to the presence of unidentified aircraft operating in restricted military airspace. At last count, 11 near mid-air collisions were reported. There have also been mysterious undersea vehicles detected, reportedly traveling at hundreds of miles per hour. Meanwhile, nuclear weapons and nuclear power facilities continue to be surveilled. In sum, DoD and the IC have a lot of work to do before we get a handle on the situation. If I’m wrong, and “most” of these incidents have suddenly been explained, wonderful! However, I find it doubtful the pending UAP report is going to indicate we’ve suddenly found explanations for over 200 UAP incidents since May.
Yet, in his article, The UFO Bubble Goes Pop, Jenkins joins Julian Barnes of the New York Times in predicting precisely that. He claims the reason the UAP report that was due October 31st has been delayed is because DoD suddenly found conventional explanations for most UAP reports. If it turns out that explanations have been found for most of these incidents, that is valuable and important progress, but the UAP issue is not going away. Hundreds of unexplained sightings will remain and many of the most interesting reports, such as that of the Nimitz case, will continue to challenge conventional mindsets and intellectual complacency.

Hopefully we can all at least acknowledge the vital importance of investigating the source of so many worrisome violations of US airspace. In the meantime, I urge reporters to do the serious homework that Jenkins, Barnes, and Shostak have not, which involves reviewing historic UAP documentation and research materials; talking to leading UAP researchers; and above all interviewing the US military personnel who have encountered these vehicles. Climbing this mountain of UAP information is not difficult, it just takes a bit of time and effort. I hope a few serious journalists will make the effort because the view from the top is incredibly fascinating and the American people deserve informed analysis.

---