- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Tweet @TedCruz for questions to ask in the impeachment
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:02 am
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:02 am
#verdictTed Cruz asks us to tweet him your questions to ask by using the hash tag #verdict in the tweet.
My question that I sent is:
"Shouldn't the four Democrat U.S. Senators that are competing to run against President Trump in the 2020 election recuse themselves for their obvious conflict of interest?"
My question that I sent is:
"Shouldn't the four Democrat U.S. Senators that are competing to run against President Trump in the 2020 election recuse themselves for their obvious conflict of interest?"
11
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:06 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
My question that I sent is: "Shouldn't the four Democrat U.S. Senators that are competing to run against President Trump in the 2020 election recuse themselves for their obvious conflict of interest
This is a genuine valid question. While not a true “trial” they would never be allowed on the jury. BUT again, nor would any of the hearsay BS be allowed either.
Should be asked
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:08 am to HubbaBubba
Their votes, would in fact be furthering their personal political agenda
Some would call that abuse of power
Some would call that abuse of power
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:08 am to HubbaBubba
I would add to that question, "and shouldn't they also be placed under a gag order from giving their opinions about the outcome before the trial is finished?" Elizabeth Warren is already screaming to the world on Twitter that Trump is guilty.
She's an impartial juror. Obviously.
She's an impartial juror. Obviously.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:08 am to HubbaBubba
Please tell us when, where, how, and by whom was Joe Biden's corruption in the Ukraine "debunked"?
I'll hang up and listen.
I'll hang up and listen.
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 10:10 am
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:09 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Tweet @TedCruz for questions
Ted
When will the Reps get their balls back?
Signed
'Merica
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:12 am to BoarEd
quote:Tweet your question to @TedCruz with hash tag #verdict.
I would add to that question, "and shouldn't they also be placed under a gag order from giving their opinions about the outcome before the trial is finished?" Elizabeth Warren is already screaming to the world on Twitter that Trump is guilty.
She's an impartial juror. Obviously.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:17 am to HubbaBubba
"Why didn't the House release the transcript of their witness IG Michael Atkinson? Why did they release the transcript for the other 17 witnesses, but not his?"
"KCT knows"
"KCT knows"
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:17 am to HubbaBubba
I don't do Twitter.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:19 am to KCT
quote:
"Why didn't the House release the transcript of their witness IG Michael Atkinson? Why did they release the transcript for the other 17 witnesses, but not his?"
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:23 am to HubbaBubba
Not just the four running for president but anyone that also received a campaign donation from Hunter Biden.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:25 am to Buddy Red
quote:
quote:
My question that I sent is: "Shouldn't the four Democrat U.S. Senators that are competing to run against President Trump in the 2020 election recuse themselves for their obvious conflict of interest
This is a genuine valid question. While not a true “trial” they would never be allowed on the jury. BUT again, nor would any of the hearsay BS be allowed either.
Should be asked
It appears that WH working with Senators is a bigger conflict of interest......
The person on trial can't work with the jury foreman (McConnell)
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:25 am to boomtown143
How long will we stand idely by and let liberals fleece us and blame Trump for the exact things they did. Its ridiculous.
1. Work with foreign government to influence an election.
Accuse Trump of working with Russia to influence an election
2. Democratic VP and current presidential front-runner withholds aid to Ukraine government in order to have investigation into son terminated
Accuse Trump of withholding aid for political gain
Can half the country actually not see this?
1. Work with foreign government to influence an election.
Accuse Trump of working with Russia to influence an election
2. Democratic VP and current presidential front-runner withholds aid to Ukraine government in order to have investigation into son terminated
Accuse Trump of withholding aid for political gain
Can half the country actually not see this?
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 10:31 am
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:31 am to LaTexSaint
quote:
It appears that WH working with Senators is a bigger conflict of interest......
The person on trial can't work with the jury foreman (McConnell)
Valid point. I can see the analogy.
Don’t agree that it’s bigger. But, still understand the argument
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 10:33 am
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:34 am to KCT
quote:Legit, but I would rather ask it this way:
"Why didn't the House release the transcript of their witness IG Michael Atkinson? Why did they release the transcript for the other 17 witnesses, but not his?"
"The Senate requests the release of the IG Michael Atkinson interview. Will the House Managers comply with this request?"
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:37 am to Buddy Red
quote:
It appears that WH working with Senators is a bigger conflict of interest......
The person on trial can't work with the jury foreman (McConnell)
quote:Actually, is somewhat valid, except that the whistleblower worked directly with House Manager Schiff, so in the interest of fairness, this exception is made.
Valid point. I can see the analogy.
Don’t agree that it’s bigger. But, still understand the argument
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:41 am to LaTexSaint
quote:
The person on trial can't work with the jury foreman
It has been pointed out numerous times that criminal trial procedures don't apply to a political process.
Just sayin'
Posted on 1/29/20 at 10:47 am to MMauler
quote:This Shampeachment is about to sound just like bad call-in radio:"this next question comes to us from Bernie from New Hampshire who writes, up next is Ted from Texas..."
Please tell us when, where, how, and by whom was Joe Biden's corruption in the Ukraine "debunked"?
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:16 am to HubbaBubba
The only question that needs asking is this, Were Joe Biden not now a POTUS canidate would any of this be out of line?
Follow up
And if not as he was undecalaired at the time why is it an issue now or rather does declaring make him off limits?
Follow up
And if not as he was undecalaired at the time why is it an issue now or rather does declaring make him off limits?
Posted on 1/29/20 at 11:18 am to Sidicous
quote:
This Shampeachment is about to sound just like bad call-in radio:
Next up -- Omar the Tent Maker.
Maybe they can get River Parish Disposal to sponsor it --
"Our bidness stinks but ids pickin up."
This post was edited on 1/29/20 at 11:20 am
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News