- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Tulsi Gabbard was generally not supportive of attacking Iran.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 1:44 pm to The Baker
Posted on 5/22/26 at 1:44 pm to The Baker
quote:
Why are yall upset?
Take the win
Just because we may or may not agree with military actions against Iran, does not let us fabricate wins.
Tulsi resigned. It had nothing to do with Iran or her relationship with President Trump.
It just is what it is.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 1:45 pm to The Baker
quote:You didn’t. I inferred it. Apologies if I misread your intentions.
Where did I say she resigned because of Iran?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 1:49 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
You didn’t. I inferred it. Apologies if I misread your intentions.
Well I didnt mean to.
I legitimately think the reaction is strange because she was outspoken about there being no nuclear threat from Iran among other things... the core reasoning behind our operation there.
Like when John Bolton left in 2019... I was very encouraged.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 1:53 pm to The Baker
quote:I trusted her judgement/knowledge of this. I was never in favor of either operation. I hope it comes to a conclusion in the very near future.
I legitimately think the reaction is strange because she was outspoken about there being no nuclear threat from Iran among other things... the core reasoning behind our operation there.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:03 pm to The Baker
How is she leaving because her husband have cancer a win? Tulsi is a very nice person with strong core beliefs. She is also a team player and once a decision is made she gets on board. That’s why there have been no leaks out of her side of the house.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:04 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
How is she leaving because her husband have cancer a win?
Politically,
I don't think her husband having cancer is a win.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:09 pm to The Baker
quote:
Tulsi Gabbard was generally not supportive of attacking Iran.
Why are yall upset?
Take the win.
When you approach something with a false premise, you get confused when things don't add up.
This is a great example.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:10 pm to The Baker
The ODNI’s report stated that Iran was not enriching uranium and Iran was not a threat to the US. She had to go
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:36 pm to moneyg
quote:
When you approach something with a false premise,
Alright.
What's the false premise?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:49 pm to The Baker
quote:
What's the false premise?
That MAGA is neocon and anything other than a neocon point of view is unacceptable and therefore would be something MAGA should celebrate.
Why are you pretending that you don't know what your own premise was.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:52 pm to moneyg
quote:
Why are you pretending that you don't know what your own premise was.
I know what my premise was, and you stated it accurately.
I just don't agree that its false...
Its in the face of starting another Middle East conflict... and lambasting anyone who detracted.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:54 pm to The Baker
quote:
But the rest of you... generally supportive of the war...
Does that make you generally supportive of Iran having nukes?
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:56 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Does that make you generally supportive of Iran having nukes?
Ideally... I'd rather zero countries have nukes.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 2:59 pm to The Baker
quote:
I know what my premise was, and you stated it accurately.
I just don't agree that its false...
You admit it's false because MAGA isn't meeting your expectations. You are confused to the point of having to ask the question:
quote:
Why are yall upset?
The reality is that your premise is false and what you are actually doing with this thread is offering a passive aggressive way of accusing MAGA of being neocon. It's probably related to some sour grapes issue like Massie being defeated.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 3:08 pm to moneyg
quote:
accusing MAGA of being neocon.
It is neocon.
I know that, because starting a war with Iran has defined Neoconservative foreign policy for many decades.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 3:57 pm to The Baker
quote:
accusing MAGA of being neocon.
It is neocon.
false
quote:
I know that, because starting a war with Iran has defined Neoconservative foreign policy for many decades.
I'd bet that the large, large majority would LOVE for the Iranian conflict to come to a quick, successful end.
You are simply confused when people aren't binary thinkers. It frustrates you that Trump hasn't lost 100% support due to an issue that is overall unpopular.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 5:17 pm to The Baker
Joo tards perpetually mad.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 7:56 pm to The Baker
quote:
Politically
There was no political consideration in her decision.
Posted on 5/22/26 at 8:13 pm to Mid Iowa Tiger
quote:
There was no political consideration in her decision.
Didnt say there was
Popular
Back to top


0



