- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:44 am to Kjnstkmn
Held Harvey stationary for days? I was prepositioned in Katy during Harvey and, while it was slow-moving, it was never stationary. It lasted 36 hours at most
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:49 am to TFH
4 separate discussions are going on in this thread:
1. Does the government modify the weather?
2. If it does, what is the extent to which the weather can be modified?
3. Why would the government modify the weather to flood a girls' camp
4. Tucker is a lunatic for discussing this
First, yes, it is an easily provable fact that we can modify the weather. There are public websites that announce cloud seeding operations. So anyone who doubts that is retarded.
Second, the EXTENT to which the government can INTENTIONALLY modify weather is unknown. It is feasible there has been a weaponization of this tech, we just don't have any proof. However, there is a valid question on the UNINTENTIONALITY of weather manipulation and the government’s culpability in that.
Third, I don't see any reason the government would intentionally target that area of TX. That is a pretty stupid idea. I can see an UNINTENTIONAL effect being covered up. That's par for the course with the government.
Fourth, the Tucker hate on this board has gotten WAY out of hand. He’s the same guy he has always been, asking curious questions like an actual reporter does. He discusses ideas that may offend people to discover truth. I thought that's what the right always championed.Somewhere along the way, the right has started to act like the left, screeching and crying at people who dare question the government.
1. Does the government modify the weather?
2. If it does, what is the extent to which the weather can be modified?
3. Why would the government modify the weather to flood a girls' camp
4. Tucker is a lunatic for discussing this
First, yes, it is an easily provable fact that we can modify the weather. There are public websites that announce cloud seeding operations. So anyone who doubts that is retarded.
Second, the EXTENT to which the government can INTENTIONALLY modify weather is unknown. It is feasible there has been a weaponization of this tech, we just don't have any proof. However, there is a valid question on the UNINTENTIONALITY of weather manipulation and the government’s culpability in that.
Third, I don't see any reason the government would intentionally target that area of TX. That is a pretty stupid idea. I can see an UNINTENTIONAL effect being covered up. That's par for the course with the government.
Fourth, the Tucker hate on this board has gotten WAY out of hand. He’s the same guy he has always been, asking curious questions like an actual reporter does. He discusses ideas that may offend people to discover truth. I thought that's what the right always championed.Somewhere along the way, the right has started to act like the left, screeching and crying at people who dare question the government.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:23 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 8:57 am to theunknownknight
quote:
1. Does the government modify the weather? 2. If it does, what is the extent to which the weather can be modified? 3. Why would the government modify the weather to flood a girls' camp 4. Tucker is a lunatic for discussing this
1. If you want to call cloud-seeding “weather modification”, that’s up to you. All it does is make it rain slightly more. This is easily researched.
2. As a pilot I’m also an amateur meteorologist and you can’t begin to grasp the enormous powers involved in creating the weather. Trump has mentioned dropping a nuke on hurricanes and even that wouldn’t do anything.
3. They wouldn’t. They couldn’t. It’s just dumb. In 2010 a public campground in Arkansas flooded and killed over a dozen people. These things happen.
4. Tucker can do whatever he wants. He has become more fringe and has delved more into conspiracy theory shite. That’s his niche and a lot of people like that shite. I think it’s retarded, especially when things are so easily proven false.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:03 am to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I appreciate Tucker for this. He is a skilled interviewer who provides a valuable public service. His audience can reach their own conclusions about the credibility of his guests.
You're either the most naive person on the planet or just pretending not to know how this works. 99.9% of the people following Tucker will watch this and blindly accept it as fact and add it to the list of things they "know because I researched it on the internet". Nobody on the fence is saying "Let me watch this TC interview and form an opinion". They are just looking for validation.
Tucker knows this as well, and knows exactly who to book and how to get views.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:07 am to TFH
quote:
I think it’s retarded, especially when things are so easily proven false.
This is where you lose me and sound like the left—these generic lazy attacks.
First of all, what “things”? And what is he saying that he claims explicitly is categorically valid, that is easily falsifiable?
Secondly, as I stated before, it has always been the right in the last 20 years that has championed curiosity and questioning narratives. We were ALL about that while Biden was president *cough* Q *cough*
Now, suddenly, out of nowhere, discussions about Epstein are fringe, discussions about foreign influence are fringe, discussions about billionaires having too much influence are fringe, questions the government’s motives are fringe, asking the government’s honesty is fringe, questioning the government’s compentancy is fringe, having crazy discussions on a person’s own personal channel about whatever the hell they want because this is America and that's what makes us different is fringe
I’ll come straight out and ask it: when did the right become such pussies?
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 9:09 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:11 am to theunknownknight
??
Well I haven’t seen anyone claim any of those things are fringe. If you just want to rant at clouds I’m going to let you engage someone else because I don’t have time for nonsensical drivel
Well I haven’t seen anyone claim any of those things are fringe. If you just want to rant at clouds I’m going to let you engage someone else because I don’t have time for nonsensical drivel
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:12 am to TFH
quote:
Well I haven’t seen anyone claim any of those things are fringe. If you just want to rant at clouds I’m going to let you engage someone else because I don’t have time for nonsensical drivel
You may want to learn to read and comprehend first.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 9:22 am to Kjnstkmn
For those of you claiming none of this could be real, why have Tennessee and Florida banned geo engineering over their skies? I think TDS could also stand for Tucker Derangement Syndrome. No way any of you claiming he’s crazy bothered listening to this guest or any of his guests.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:00 am to theunknownknight
quote:
4 separate discussions are going on in this thread
Best post in the thread, nail on the head for all 4
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:01 am to TFH
quote:
I feel sorry for y’all who are so stupid as to fall for his shite.
They'll believe anything that sociopath says.
He no doubt laughs at them thinking, "Is there anything I can put on here that they WON'T believe?"
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:02 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:05 am to theunknownknight
quote:
when did the right become such pussies?
I'll ask when did the right become so stupid?
The right used to be the only adult in the room. Now the horseshoe is closing and there is no adult in the room.
I remember watching black people being interviewed on t.v. after Hurricane Katrina claiming that George Bush caused the hurricane on purpose to kill black people.
Now people on the right believe the same nonsense. That the government can control the weather.
I never would have believed that back then, but the populism Kool Aid is more powerful than I ever would have imagined.
This post was edited on 11/11/25 at 10:06 am
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:07 am to wackatimesthree
Tucker has become this generation's Art Bell.
Art's show was entertaining, but almost no-one took him serious.
Art's show was entertaining, but almost no-one took him serious.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:27 am to L1C4
quote:
Tucker has become this generation's Art Bell.
Art's show was entertaining, but almost no-one took him serious.
I've said the same thing for a while now, but what bothers me is that Art Bell existed before social media and the internet.
I think people DO take Huckster seriously.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:31 am to wackatimesthree
Trump saved us from hurricane season by turning the machines off and now everyone decides to shite on Tucker.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:38 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Note the Grok reply that indicates this cloud seeding operation is not close to the scale to account for the massive flooding which occurred.
That interview describes how his technology would work:
3 drones + 1lb of agent = 40M pounds of rain
I think it’s fair to assume the military could scale that using their lift/cargo planes to a much wider scale.
I haven’t evaluated any proof to say they did and will have to listen to the interview to see if Tuckers guest has any compelling evidence on that front.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 10:38 am to wackatimesthree
quote:Great nickname.
I think people DO take Huckster seriously.
From now on he shall be called Huckster Carlson.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:12 am to wackatimesthree
quote:
One day y'all are going to feel really dumb for having taken one thing that obvious Huckster said seriously.
The few with enough brain cells left to realize they got took by Tucker will never admit it
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:25 am to Kjnstkmn
quote:
Dane Wigington from bio-engineering watch who is saying that the Tx flash flood was a case of weather modification and it is beyond dispute.
100%
Just like the "hurricane" that impossibly defied all natural meteorological laws and traveled over and into the Smoky Mountains and laid waste to a large swath of it.
It is even admitted by official goob docs that they would "CONTROL THE WEATHER BY 2025". (look it up)
Dane Wigington also brings all the receipts on "chemtrails" (or if that phrase is too scary, the "atmospheric aerosoling" and whiting-out of clear blue skies that anyone with their own two eyes can see for the last 20years.) Everyone should watch his documentary.
Posted on 11/11/25 at 11:26 am to theunknownknight
quote:
the Tucker hate on this board has gotten WAY out of hand.
He’s the same guy he has always been, asking curious questions like an actual reporter does. He discusses ideas that may offend people to discover truth. I thought that's what the right always championed.
THIS
Popular
Back to top


2





