- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Poor children in poor countries being taken by organized crime into forced labor and sex work is not the same thing as problems at home leading to runaways, foster care and the things you referenced.


Holy frick are you under a big goddamned rock..

Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:05 am to captdalton
quote:
It takes a special kind of immorality to defend child trafficking for any reason
Simpletons have been led to believe by propagandists that trafficking does not occur here.
It absolutely does. frick even the Mexican cartels are involved in youth trafficking in the USA.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:17 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Holy frick are you under a big goddamned rock
Are you going to give an actual, honest response to my comment or just use emojis?
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:17 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Simpletons have been led to believe by propagandists that trafficking does not occur here.
With the way trafficking is defined now, nobody argues this.
quote:
frick even the Mexican cartels are involved in youth trafficking in the USA.
Show me an objective piece about this because you didn't give any details and I'd like to know more
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 11:18 am
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:18 am to stout
That dude has never been in a fight in his life. Someone should punch him in his throat. It would help society.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:20 am to SlowFlowPro
This is like the “show me evidence of election cheating”. People are looking to feed their Confirmation Bias, and not objective truth.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:26 am to the808bass
quote:
That dude has never been in a fight in his life.
They're easy to spot in a crowd, for sure.
I'd put money on him being sexually abused as a child.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 11:40 am to RCDfan1950
quote:
This is like the “show me evidence of election cheating”.
Evidence is important, don't you think?
quote:
People are looking to feed their Confirmation Bias, and not objective truth.
Hence, again, why actual evidence/data is important.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 12:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
So you think minors who have sex with other minors should be prosecuted?
Didn't you once claim to be a libertarian?
You are such a disingenuous sack of sh*+. It depends on the circumstances and age of the minor, counselor.
And that is exactly why age of consent and various age-gap provision laws exist in some states. Yet unlike your claims above indicating that this ICJ report is merely seeking to abolish penalties in the case of a 18 year old having sex with with a 15 year old, this report puts NO lower limit on the age of consent for minors.
A 6 year old can’t willfully consent to sex with a 16 year old since prepubescent children don’t have the emotional or mental capacity to understand what sexual consent even entails. No amount of crawfishing or goal-post moving on your part changes the inescapable reality of what the ICJ report actually entails.
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 12:59 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 12:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Are you going to give an actual, honest response to my comment or just use emojis?
You aren’t here for an “honest” discussion you sanctimonious sack-of-sh*+.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 12:36 pm to stout
You're citing the fish wrap known as The Guardian???
Posted on 7/8/23 at 12:48 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Unlike your claims above indicating that this ICJ report is merely seeking to abolish penalties in the case of a 18 year old having sex with with a 15 year old,
I believe that's the primary intent, based on the context of reading the entire document (which you have not done).
quote:
this report puts NO lower limit on the age of consent for minors.
Did I ever say this report was perfectly written?
No, I'm just attempting to correct echo chamber talking points. As stated before in my explanation of the "loaded question", you make a lot of assumptions necessary to form your arguments and ignore what is being actually said.
*ETA: now I wait for you to claim I'm crawfishing because you weren't smart enough to understand what was actually being said.
This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 12:49 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 12:49 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
You aren’t here for an “honest” discussion you sanctimonious sack-of-sh*+.
Says the man relying on assumptions and strawman arguments without even reading the source material that he's discussing (and relying on provided for talking points like a sheep)

Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
(which you have not done).
I read the entire document you skillet head. And unlike you, I actually have reading comprehension skills. You are an utter embarrassment to the legal profession.

quote:
Did I ever say this report was perfectly written?
Here is the goalpost shift!

This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 1:04 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:03 pm to Rolek
quote:
You're citing the fish wrap known as The Guardian???
Its nice to peek into the minds of the gaslighting machine once in a while.
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:11 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the man relying on assumptions and strawman arguments without even reading the source material that he's discussing (and relying on provided for talking points like a sheep)
Once again, SFP posts and the board’s hypocrisy meter is tapping out!


This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 1:18 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:14 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Another of SFP’s predicable tactics is to claim we don’t have the mental capacity to follow his intricate arguments and infallible reasoning:
![]()
![]()
And here it is, just like clockwork!


Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:17 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
And here it is, just like clockwork!
Its mind blowing.
I'm starting to think hes a troll trying to make SFP look like a bot. Line after line of talking points...

Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:37 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Its mind blowing.
I have vacillated myself between wondering if SFP is truly an autistic circus clown or simply a dedicated troll. Like Hank promoting explicit BDSM kink in public as innocuous fun appropriate for all ages, this act has become parody of itself in this thread.
If a troll, SFP is severely slipping; if genuine, SFP is even denser than I thought. In any event, what a very strange bird.

This post was edited on 7/8/23 at 4:05 pm
Posted on 7/8/23 at 1:45 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Here is the goalpost shift!
Damn. I called it.
Back to top
