- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:31 pm to the808bass
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:31 pm to the808bass
He may not know what he is arguing. But damn it, he is right.
0
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
Fair enough. I hadn’t seen that clip.
I had seen a clip where he referred to organ trafficking (which is real) and saw some people equating organ trafficking with adrenachrome (which wasn’t explicit).
That was explicit.
FWIW - None of that was even hinted at in the movie and the movie’s producer explicitly disavowed QAnon.
I had seen a clip where he referred to organ trafficking (which is real) and saw some people equating organ trafficking with adrenachrome (which wasn’t explicit).
That was explicit.
FWIW - None of that was even hinted at in the movie and the movie’s producer explicitly disavowed QAnon.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:33 pm to the808bass
More conspiracy theories
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:46 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:35 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Dude they still post that mythology on this board to this day
Cool. And irrelevant.
quote:
They did this themselves. They still post about this pretty regularly on here.
No. There’s no union. There are points of intersection. Logic.
quote:
Again, blame the Q-mmunity. I agree it's sloppy. I'm just posting receipts
Of course a thousand posters with various conspiracy theories are going to have different iterations of their conspiracy theory. But here you are, sloppily conflating all of then with the McMartin case from 1983.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:36 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:40 pm to bamadontcare
But those guys aren’t doing it for Satan. So it’s ok.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:41 pm to the808bass
quote:
Of course a thousand posters with various conspiracy theories are going to have different iterations of their conspiracy theory. But here you are, sloppily conflating all of then with the McMartin case from 1983.
What level of pervasiveness and synchronicity would make my claims valid, in your eye?
For the record, I would directly ask posters if they believed in that "conflation". A few did say yes and most didn't answer (even though there are posts from their past promoting it).
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:41 pm to the808bass
quote:
So it’s ok.
Nobody has argued this.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Your argument has become clearer the last few pages. You HATE Q. And your goal is to equate anyone that watches this movie as a “crazy conspiracy theorist”. Cool. You definitely have a much bigger problem with Q than with child sex traffic. There is no other way to explain why you have taken the position you have.
It really isn’t even about trafficking. You just see this as an opportunity to bash your opponents. And good for you. Because winning an internet argument is much more important than human trafficking.
It really isn’t even about trafficking. You just see this as an opportunity to bash your opponents. And good for you. Because winning an internet argument is much more important than human trafficking.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
SRA is literally the focal point of the discussion.
No, the media hysteria surrounding the movie and its portrayal as "Qanon-adjacent" in MSM coverage is what the thread is about.
You're the one with the Satanic hard-on.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Nobody has argued this.
I’m plumbing the depths of shitty arguments, using your posts as a model.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:45 pm to captdalton
quote:
You HATE Q.
No.
I have a particular soft spot for SRA/Occult CTs.
For....going on 15 years? Maybe closer to 20? It's well-documented (there's a meme on the OT about mentioning the Satanic Panic as a batsignal of sorts for me).
Q just jumped into the ring of my bread and butter. I don't "hate' Q.
quote:
And your goal is to equate anyone that watches this movie as a “crazy conspiracy theorist”.
And that's a lie.
quote:
There is no other way to explain why you have taken the position you have.
Being an exposer of the bullshite that is SRA and Occult Satanism, generally, has already been known as a part of me for 15+ years.
I'm just doing what I always have done.
quote:
You just see this as an opportunity to bash your opponents.
-Opponents
+Stupid CTs that hurt people
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
When Q was brought into the discussion, it became about SRA.
Q = SRA
modern SRA = Q
It's the same thing, Rog.
Jesus Tapdancing Christ. Your lack of substantive information about Q might be impressive it it weren't so sad.
You own a Everything I Know About Qanon I Learned from The Daily Beast shirt, don't you?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:45 pm to the808bass
quote:
I’m plumbing the depths of shitty arguments, using your posts as a model.
Cool
Find one where I say human trafficking is "OK"
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:46 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
What level of pervasiveness and synchronicity would make my claims valid, in your eye?
It might help your argument if the Qanons were at least 16 years old in 1983.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
Don’t get mad if someone makes bad arguments in a thread where you’re doing your best impression of an orangutan at the zoo with a ready supply of feces.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
Man this thread has been a bad look for you. It might take another 15 years to recover.
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:53 pm to the808bass
quote:
Don’t get mad if someone makes bad arguments in a thread where you’re doing your best impression of an orangutan at the zoo with a ready supply of feces.
I'm not mad that people (Not you. I'm discussing others) have to resort to literally lying to "win" the argument. I said earlier it's sad.
My arguments have been consistent about this issue, as they have been for 15+ years on here.
It's quite clear that people who won't accept that the Q-mmunity promoted SRA conspiracy theories also won't understand why this movie (with its source, lead actor, and target audience) is being linked to the Q-mmunity.
This post was edited on 7/10/23 at 5:54 pm
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I have a particular soft spot for SRA/Occult CTs.
For....going on 15 years? Maybe closer to 20? It's well-documented (there's a meme on the OT about mentioning the Satanic Panic as a batsignal of sorts for me).
Q just jumped into the ring of my bread and butter. I don't "hate' Q.
Why have you focused so much time and effort for something that does not exist?
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:55 pm to Cobbvol
quote:
Why have you focused so much time and effort for something that does not exist?
Because the effects of this stupidity end up hurting innocent people.
And I like good CTs and not this low-level trailer park style of CT
Posted on 7/10/23 at 5:56 pm to captdalton
quote:
Man this thread has been a bad look for you
Nowhere near the group of people who have to use lies to make themselves feel better. I can live with that.
Page 36 of 49
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News