- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trying to stop child trafficking is now "Qanon-adjacent" and "paranoid"
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:31 am to NC_Tigah
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:31 am to NC_Tigah
quote:
No
That comment wasn't aimed at you
quote:
But, I am not on board with an Epstein character targeting 15-16 y/o kids to use as sex tools in an extortion racket, or for prostitution.
I understand, but those cases are so rare they have to become amplified to fit a particular narrative. And there are thousands of American runaways that can actually be targeted and helped by using fewer resources.
A needle in a haystack still involves an actual needle.
The question is if it's worth using 100 hours of your time to find that needle when you can just go inside and get another one in 2 minutes. You find the needles in both instances, but you can find a lot more needles with one method (and you don't risk the government creating a new needle finding agency with new needle finding laws so they can continue to spy on you, steal your property, and interject themselves into your life).
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:33 am to wutangfinancial
quote:
You just admitted they have no power. T
They have impact.
quote:
Those people have basically been shunned from public life and you think they can shift federal law enforcement policy in the executive branch?
As targets? Yes.
Did you not see the J6 prosecutions and the lengths fedgov went to arrest hundreds of trespassers who did not act violently? Those people didn't have any power to enact policy, but they sure had the impact necessary to see government unleashed.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:35 am to aTmTexas Dillo
quote:
Is this The Guardian?
With a click bait tagline that attracted simps. They must speak!
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 11:36 am
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:47 am to SlowFlowPro
I see your point on impact but that’s an entirely different angle. The federal government is not going to use the “elites are trafficking children” narratives to crack down on the elite.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:50 am to wutangfinancial
quote:
The federal government is not going to use the “elites are trafficking children” narratives to crack down on the elite.
Exactly.
Strip Clubs (I briefly worked int he industry) and onlyfans are loaded with trafficked women. They usually do massive sweeps and pick up a bunch of low levels, the wealthy party circuits are off limits..
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:57 am to wutangfinancial
quote:
The federal government is not going to use the “elites are trafficking children” narratives to crack down on the elite.
No that's just a subset of Q-dom. The part they don't admit to being a real driver of their care in this subject (in public, at least).
Jan 6 and all that stupidity had little to do with child sex trafficking also, and it involved Q-lunacy. The point of that example was just how that population DOES have an impact. I mean they had a big enough population/impact to have a riot at the Capitol and then breach the Capitol.
But they're nothing more than useful idiots. Like I said earlier, at this point I think Q was a psyop from the government to create these perceived "bad guys" (like we used to do with Muslims to manufacture terrorism) and marginalize anything to the right of Mao. I mean they ARE doing the same playbook we did with brown-skinned Muslims back in the 00s and 10s, so it's possible.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 11:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No that's just a subset of Q-dom


Posted on 7/9/23 at 12:27 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Q was a psyop from the government to create these perceived "bad guys" (like we used to do with Muslims to manufacture terrorism) and marginalize anything to the right of Mao.
This is exactly what it appeared to be. The funny part is they were able to launder a ton of well documented government crimes as crazy conspiracies at the same time.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 12:50 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Truth nuke?
Precisely what the author in the article did by pushing the Q button which raises the hackles on you simpletons.
The author is literally making stuff up, throwing out shitty talking points to make you morally outraged and here you are...
Posted on 7/9/23 at 12:59 pm to ReauxlTide222
quote:
Truth nuke?
Rog was rambling. No author was being discussed in the post he quoted

Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:06 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Says the guy who thinks that there was a covid vaccine in March of 2020

Again, WTF are you babbling about now?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Like I said earlier, at this point I think Q was a psyop from the government to create these perceived "bad guys" (like we used to do with Muslims to manufacture terrorism) and marginalize anything to the right of Mao. I mean they ARE doing the same playbook we did with brown-skinned Muslims back in the 00s and 10s, so it's possible.
This is one of the few things you’ve stated in this thread in which we agree. Welcome to where I’ve been since the entire “Q-Anon” phenomenon appeared as a matter of concern by both the MSM and the permanent bipartisan reigning regime in D.C.

Posted on 7/9/23 at 1:17 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Attracted your autistic arse like a moth to a flame.
Rog was rambling. No author was being discussed in the post he quoted
You are his target audience.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:15 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The state is transitioning from the war on drugs to the war on trafficking to increase their authoritarianism and the Q-tards are ensuring this government overreach occurs.
Government overreach occurs? Welcome to yesterday’s headlines.
The state is increasingly waging war on children by promoting the antiscientific and frankly demonic notion that a boy born a boy can “transition” into a girl — or vice-versa — vis-à-vis hormone and surgical “therapy.”
Indeed, we are fast moving to the point where the state will claim it has the legal authority to intervene if parents are opposed to the chemical castration and gender mutilation of their children. We are already seeing it in California.

Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:16 pm to wutangfinancial
quote:
You just admitted they have no power. Those people have basically been shunned from public life and you think they can shift federal law enforcement policy in the executive branch?
The fantasy world SFP lives in is as nonsensical as any fever dream imagined by the most fervent Q-Anon devotee.

Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:19 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
Again, WTF are you babbling about now?
You posted a post of mine yesetrday in response to a comment about me being a pro-Vaxxer, but failed to read (as usual) the post of mine was from March of 2020, when no vaccine existed.
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:22 pm to Jjdoc
quote:There must have been an organized effort from an organized agency to respond to this movie in this way.
It's wild to see the media go after this movie!
hmm, now who could do that?
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:24 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Attracted your autistic arse like a moth to a flame.
You are his target audience.

Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
You posted a post of mine yesetrday in response to a comment about me being a pro-Vaxxer, but failed to read (as usual) the post of mine was from March of 2020, when no vaccine existed.

I have no clue whatsoever of your opinion on vaccine mandates.
The point of highlighting that post was to demonstrate your moral panic during the early days of the pandemic.
Certainly you weren’t alone in expressing those fears yet the point here is the heightened sense of panic that gripped the nation during that time was generated primarily by government induced fear-porn.
This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 3:23 pm
Posted on 7/9/23 at 2:43 pm to Toomer Deplorable
quote:
The point of highlighting that post was to demonstrate your moral panic during the early days of the pandemic.
My moral panic about the threat of government authoritarianism increasing in response to COVID?
I mean I'll take the label, but it quickly moved from "moral panic" to "reality" in a week or 2.

This post was edited on 7/9/23 at 2:46 pm
Back to top
