- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump: Vivek disguises his support in the form of deceitful campaign tricks, is not MAGA
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:04 pm to LSUSlidell23
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:04 pm to LSUSlidell23
quote:
How is Vivek a Democrat?
Sweet mother of God look back at what post I replied to and what you said in it.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:09 pm to BuckyCheese
Sorry I’m not a conspiracy theorist like that. A few years ago you and your buddies would’ve been tarred and feathered for your far reaching, intricate, outlandish conspiracy theory that you’ve fashioned for yourselves. It’s very pitiful the depths y’all have sunk to in your silly hatred and jealousy of another man.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:19 pm to saint tiger225
You disagree with Tuck?
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:32 pm to RammerJammer91
Trump has jumped the shark.
75 years is usually the age people really start to decline. I think we are seeing it with him.
75 years is usually the age people really start to decline. I think we are seeing it with him.
Posted on 1/13/24 at 11:53 pm to LSUSlidell23
It doesn’t take very much to debunk that meme. Just a simple copy/paste of the supposed quote, the fake quote that is.
Just in case anyone doesn’t have the strength to do it at this time, I’ll provide a link myself, for your convenience. Reuters debunks it here, of all sources.
Reuters
Just in case anyone doesn’t have the strength to do it at this time, I’ll provide a link myself, for your convenience. Reuters debunks it here, of all sources.
Reuters
Posted on 1/14/24 at 12:00 am to davyjones
quote:
It doesn’t take very much to debunk that meme. Just a simple copy/paste of the supposed quote, the fake quote that is.
Just in case anyone doesn’t have the strength to do it at this time, I’ll provide a link myself, for your convenience. Reuters debunks it here, of all sources.
I didn't post it because it was a true article.
I posted the picture because that pretty well sums it up.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 12:16 am to LSUSlidell23
I mean, as fake as it is, it’s even a stupid premise. If all he were concerned with was getting into the White House, with no thought or concern of political principles and just wanting to use whoever or whatever he had to do in order to get there……running as a Democrat, as you propose he is, would have been the much less agonizing path in that case. Nah. He ran as a Republican because he believed (believes) that to be the right thing to do. And did it knowing that it was going to be unpleasant to the most extreme degree. What have you done lately? To be fair in this regard, what have I done lately for that matter??
Posted on 1/14/24 at 8:41 am to RammerJammer91
I don’t have a problem at all with a Republican/conservative acknowledging Juneteenth. It’s been around for a long arse time anyway in red state Texas. Why shouldn’t the theme of that day be celebrated?
Also, Vivek is correct on the “don’t say gay” legislation. Republicans suck at branding, and if an honest discussion could be had around “just wait until kids are at least 8 before teaching it in schools”, I believe the vast majority of Americans would agree with that.
Also, Vivek is correct on the “don’t say gay” legislation. Republicans suck at branding, and if an honest discussion could be had around “just wait until kids are at least 8 before teaching it in schools”, I believe the vast majority of Americans would agree with that.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 8:47 am to ragincajun03
So you are with Vivek supporting teaching homosexuality in school to third graders?
FFS.
Listless vessels.
FFS.
Listless vessels.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:25 am to roadGator
quote:
So you are with Vivek supporting teaching homosexuality in school to third graders?
All I said is that the branding of the legislation sucked. Put the age at whatever you want.
For what it's worth, very conservative Catholic schools tend to at least start bringing up homosexuality in 4th or 5th grade religion classes, so it's out there. There are references to it in the Bible. At some point, you address it. Ignoring doesn't make it go away.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:28 am to ragincajun03
I’d be interested to see the catholic school curriculum that celebrates sexuality to grade schoolers.
My guess is that they stick to the biblical references rather than how awesome it is to be be gay or it’s a ok for a boy to say he’s a girl at that age.
My guess is that they stick to the biblical references rather than how awesome it is to be be gay or it’s a ok for a boy to say he’s a girl at that age.
This post was edited on 1/14/24 at 9:31 am
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:29 am to roadGator
quote:
So you are with Vivek supporting teaching homosexuality in school to third graders?
Vivek is a simp magnet.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:32 am to roadGator
I didn't say it was celebrated, unless I did and you can find that somewhere in my post. I said it was addressed and discussed.
Did Vivek's tweet say homosexuality should be celebrated with 3rd graders? I THINK, at least what the poster pasted that I was addressing, was just don't teach sexuality until they're at least 8.
Did Vivek's tweet say homosexuality should be celebrated with 3rd graders? I THINK, at least what the poster pasted that I was addressing, was just don't teach sexuality until they're at least 8.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:35 am to ragincajun03
You know why that bill was brought about in Florida?
The looney leftist teachers were crossing the line with the trans and gay shite.
Maybe you want to trust them. As for me, nah. They can frick off and leave sex talk to the parents.
The looney leftist teachers were crossing the line with the trans and gay shite.
Maybe you want to trust them. As for me, nah. They can frick off and leave sex talk to the parents.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:35 am to LSUSlidell23
quote:
I didn't post it because it was a true article.
Ahh...so you're just like the simpletons who post the $1.50 gallon gasoline at WalMart in May 2020 acting like it was a signal of how the United States was in a great economic period.
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:37 am to roadGator
quote:
Maybe you want to trust them.
You like to want to assume alot and jump to conclusions immediately about some random internet poster for some reason.
Have fun.
This post was edited on 1/14/24 at 9:38 am
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:40 am to ragincajun03
I made no assumptions. That’s why I said maybe.
It’s ok if we disagree that teachers with green hair pushing leftist and trans ideology should be stopped from doing that especially to small children.
Wait til 8
It’s ok if we disagree that teachers with green hair pushing leftist and trans ideology should be stopped from doing that especially to small children.
Wait til 8
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:42 am to davyjones
quote:
It’s very pitiful the depths y’all have sunk to in your silly hatred and jealousy of another man.
Of whom?
Posted on 1/14/24 at 9:50 am to RogerTheShrubber
That’s very easily implied. And a rhetorical statement at that because I’m already fully aware of your objection and denial of the assertion. Which changes nothing.
Popular
Back to top



0



