- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump VETOS, US AG Barr authorizes Emergency Declaration on the Southern Border
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:26 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:26 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I believe it sets a terrible precedent that will come back and bite Republicans in the arse. We have seen it before. Democrats thought there were making the right move when they used the nuclear option to reduce the number of votes needed. That decision has haunted them throughout this Presidency because Republicans have capitalize on it. The next Democrat in power will do the same with this.
You can't win by being weak.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:28 pm to saints5021
quote:
Trump just drug his nuts all over the
Constitution.
Fify
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:30 pm to CelticDog
You mean the same constitution that gives him the authority to do what he did?
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:34 pm to CelticDog
quote:
Constitution.
Fify
Obama signed 12 National Emergencies
And forced Obamacare on Americans
This post was edited on 3/15/19 at 4:34 pm
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:34 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
quote:
I believe it sets a terrible precedent that will come back and bite Republicans in the arse.
Oh, STFU, concern troll.
It’s Constitutional.
The Senate came up just short of the number of cuck Republicans needed to override the veto.
This was all done per Constitutional procedure.
The Senate made a move and lost.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:36 pm to bamarep
quote:Actually it does not since it explicitly gives congress the power of the purse and appropriate it.
You mean the same constitution that gives him the authority to do what he did?
And he's not even justifying it on Constitutional authority, he’s basing it on legislation hundreds of years later.
So the constitutional fight won’t be over the source of authority, it will be whether one branch can cede the authority and can only take it back with veto-proof legislation.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:38 pm to CelticDog
Celtic Douche, with the zinger !!! LOLOLOL
Otto, had to change that name a long time ago, you were to embarrassed to be you !!!
Otto, had to change that name a long time ago, you were to embarrassed to be you !!!
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:41 pm to buckeye_vol
I don't think AG Barr would have stood there in the Oval office if it was an unlawful E.O.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergencies_Act
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:44 pm to Scoop
Calling someone a troll because for ONCE they disagree with your Lord and Savior Donald Trump? Classy. But that's y'alls thing. Calling everyone who disagrees with the president betas and cucks.
I realize it is all constitutional. So were all of the executive orders Obama pushed across. I disagreed with his way of pushing policy across just like I disagree with what Trump is doing here.
I realize it is all constitutional. So were all of the executive orders Obama pushed across. I disagreed with his way of pushing policy across just like I disagree with what Trump is doing here.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:46 pm to cajunangelle
How is climate change a crisis compared to what's happening at the border?
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:49 pm to Bayou_Tiger_225
OK douches this is how it is. Congress was given several chances to act. THEY FAILED. There IS an emergency down there and you cucks KNOW IT.
We gave the RINOS the House and Senate back in 2016 and they promised Trump they would give him the wall. They lied. Now they harrumph like statesmen. frick them and frick you.
Time to fight. The man's move is every bit as legal as the ones Obama declared and no one said anything. Someone has to stop the invasion down there .
We gave the RINOS the House and Senate back in 2016 and they promised Trump they would give him the wall. They lied. Now they harrumph like statesmen. frick them and frick you.
Time to fight. The man's move is every bit as legal as the ones Obama declared and no one said anything. Someone has to stop the invasion down there .
This post was edited on 3/15/19 at 4:50 pm
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:53 pm to antibarner
A liberal loon like Kamala/Chief Moonbeam/Spartacus in the White House won't give a frick about precedent
Even in the 0.1% chance they did the media would go out of their way 24/7 to justify it like obozo
Even in the 0.1% chance they did the media would go out of their way 24/7 to justify it like obozo
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:54 pm to cajunangelle
quote:He's a big supporter of the Patriot Act so let's not pretend that the Constitution is his first priority.
I don't think AG Barr would have stood there in the Oval office if it was an unlawful E.O.
In this case, it wouldn't make sense for him to fight it anyways, since he just got in the job. And just like the Patriot Act, you could use that law to justify stuff as lawful, and just ignore the Constitutionality of it.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:54 pm to LosLobos111
Go research how many E.O's Obama wrote on climate change. He had so many it crippled our economy in regulations.
If a democrat gets in there they will declare more E.O.'s of nat emergencies of global warming/climate change no matter what Trump does.
If a democrat gets in there they will declare more E.O.'s of nat emergencies of global warming/climate change no matter what Trump does.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:57 pm to CelticDog
What does a Marxist like you have any room to talk about the constitution? You are a democrat. Democrats would throw out the constitution and bill of rights TODAY if they could. You only care out the constitution when you can use it to promote your party’s goals.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 4:58 pm to buckeye_vol
Every President once they get acclimated is a supporter of the damned Patriot Act and FISA court. After the current political espionage abuses came out, all of the SOB's: R's and D's revoted the beast back in as is.
All under the guise of nat sec. you see, ain't no one gonna stop it.
All under the guise of nat sec. you see, ain't no one gonna stop it.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 5:02 pm to antibarner
quote:But the law’s intent the president to respond to an emergency when there isn't enough time to address to immediacy of the emergency with the usual process (go through Congress and President signs it).
OK douches this is how it is. Congress was given several chances to act. THEY FAILED. There IS an emergency down there and you cucks KNOW IT.
Now obviously it has been used for purposes that didn’t meat that standard before but Congress didn’t object. They probably should have, but those aren’t justification of its validity.
But since they have objected it has shown a bigger issue with the law. So not only can it be used for purposes beyond its intent, the only way to regain authority is to pass veto proof legislation.
Posted on 3/15/19 at 5:03 pm to cajunangelle
quote:Barr is the nation’s top attorney, and he’s more than just accepted it as a policy. He’s a proponent of it.
Every President once they get acclimated is a supporter of the damned Patriot Act and FISA court.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News