- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Trump to use old law to step up deportations
Posted on 7/23/19 at 5:21 am
Posted on 7/23/19 at 5:21 am
In 1996, after the number of illegal aliens in the country became intolerable (following the failed 1986 amnesty), there was a bipartisan consensus in Congress that we couldn’t adjudicate ourselves out of an invasion. Unlike in criminal cases, illegal aliens are not entitled to any due process to remain in the country if all we want to do is deport them rather than criminally prosecute them. Therefore Congress passed a law mandating that all illegal aliens be deported without any review by an immigration judge unless the illegal immigrant can prove to the “satisfaction of an immigration officer” that he has resided here for two consecutive years (8 CFR § 235.3(b)(1)(ii)).
As I noted before, the Clinton and Bush administrations never implemented the law. They only authorized expedited removal for those caught within two weeks of infiltration and only within 100 miles of the border. And even then, it was practically only used in a small percentage of cases. Millions of illegal aliens have been accorded a degree of due process explicitly denied by a consensus of Congress. The Trump administration is now looking into implementing the full extent of the law – anywhere in the U.S. within two years of entry.
Libs gonna cry put this was passed unanimously and Pelosi and Schumer voted for it.
LINK
As I noted before, the Clinton and Bush administrations never implemented the law. They only authorized expedited removal for those caught within two weeks of infiltration and only within 100 miles of the border. And even then, it was practically only used in a small percentage of cases. Millions of illegal aliens have been accorded a degree of due process explicitly denied by a consensus of Congress. The Trump administration is now looking into implementing the full extent of the law – anywhere in the U.S. within two years of entry.
Libs gonna cry put this was passed unanimously and Pelosi and Schumer voted for it.
LINK
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:19 am to Lsujacket66
District court injunction inbound..... sad reality!
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:24 am to Lsujacket66
What's to stop these people from breaking into this country, then just throwing their hands up and requesting asylum when they get caught?
As I understand Article 14, we have to take them in and hold them while we verify their claim.
As I understand Article 14, we have to take them in and hold them while we verify their claim.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:47 am to GeneralLee
quote:
District court injunction inbound..... sad reality!
Doubtful because this is clear law passed by Congress, not a regulation based on law
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:50 am to Lsujacket66
1996 isn't too old of a law
what took him so long?
what took him so long?
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:00 am to Lsujacket66
The Trump Admin should just keep this on the down low. No need to announce this. Just start enforcing the law.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:03 am to Lsujacket66
In this age, with several lefty posters actively supporting human trafficking and illegal immigration, deportations need to be hyperactive.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:20 am to Suck Out West
quote:if seeking asylum they have to come through a port of entry. They can’t just climb the fence and when they get caught say asylum.
What's to stop these people from breaking into this country, then just throwing their hands up and requesting asylum when they get caugh
That is akin to robbing a bank and getting caught and saying I was gonna give it back.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:45 am to Oddibe
As I read Article 14, they can just show up anywhere in the US. I didn't see where it says they have to apply at a port of entry.
8 U.S. Code §?1158. Asylum
(a) Authority to apply for asylum
(1) In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
8 U.S. Code §?1158. Asylum
(a) Authority to apply for asylum
(1) In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 8:26 am to Suck Out West
You announce it because now you have the Dems fighting another actual law
Posted on 7/23/19 at 9:28 am to saints5021
quote:
You announce it because now you have the Dems fighting another actual law
That Pelosi and Schumer both voted for
Posted on 7/23/19 at 9:58 am to Lsujacket66
Your argument assumes that the judge would make a logical decision based on facts. Liberal, TDS affected judges do not concern themselves with such constraints.
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:00 am to Oddibe
So from how I read 8 U.S. Code §?1158 for Asylum, they don't have to show up at a port of entry. They can show up anywhere in the US. Even if they cross in illegally.
This law needs to be fixed.
This law needs to be fixed.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News