Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Trump to use old law to step up deportations

Posted on 7/23/19 at 5:21 am
Posted by Lsujacket66
Member since Dec 2010
4792 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 5:21 am
In 1996, after the number of illegal aliens in the country became intolerable (following the failed 1986 amnesty), there was a bipartisan consensus in Congress that we couldn’t adjudicate ourselves out of an invasion. Unlike in criminal cases, illegal aliens are not entitled to any due process to remain in the country if all we want to do is deport them rather than criminally prosecute them. Therefore Congress passed a law mandating that all illegal aliens be deported without any review by an immigration judge unless the illegal immigrant can prove to the “satisfaction of an immigration officer” that he has resided here for two consecutive years (8 CFR § 235.3(b)(1)(ii)).

As I noted before, the Clinton and Bush administrations never implemented the law. They only authorized expedited removal for those caught within two weeks of infiltration and only within 100 miles of the border. And even then, it was practically only used in a small percentage of cases. Millions of illegal aliens have been accorded a degree of due process explicitly denied by a consensus of Congress. The Trump administration is now looking into implementing the full extent of the law – anywhere in the U.S. within two years of entry.

Libs gonna cry put this was passed unanimously and Pelosi and Schumer voted for it.

LINK
Posted by Average White Guy
Member since Jul 2019
31 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 5:25 am to
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13104 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:19 am to
District court injunction inbound..... sad reality!
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:24 am to
What's to stop these people from breaking into this country, then just throwing their hands up and requesting asylum when they get caught?

As I understand Article 14, we have to take them in and hold them while we verify their claim.
Posted by Lsujacket66
Member since Dec 2010
4792 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:47 am to
quote:

District court injunction inbound..... sad reality!


Doubtful because this is clear law passed by Congress, not a regulation based on law
Posted by TrueTiger
Chicken's most valuable
Member since Sep 2004
67831 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 6:50 am to
1996 isn't too old of a law

what took him so long?
Posted by TurkeyBaconLeg
Houston
Member since Jul 2018
1699 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:00 am to
The Trump Admin should just keep this on the down low. No need to announce this. Just start enforcing the law.
Posted by Bulldogblitz
In my house
Member since Dec 2018
26781 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:03 am to
In this age, with several lefty posters actively supporting human trafficking and illegal immigration, deportations need to be hyperactive.
Posted by Oddibe
Close to some, further from others
Member since Sep 2015
6566 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:20 am to
quote:

What's to stop these people from breaking into this country, then just throwing their hands up and requesting asylum when they get caugh
if seeking asylum they have to come through a port of entry. They can’t just climb the fence and when they get caught say asylum.

That is akin to robbing a bank and getting caught and saying I was gonna give it back.
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 7:45 am to
As I read Article 14, they can just show up anywhere in the US. I didn't see where it says they have to apply at a port of entry.

8 U.S. Code §?1158. Asylum

(a) Authority to apply for asylum
(1) In general
Any alien who is physically present in the United States or who arrives in the United States (whether or not at a designated port of arrival and including an alien who is brought to the United States after having been interdicted in international or United States waters), irrespective of such alien’s status, may apply for asylum in accordance with this section or, where applicable, section 1225(b) of this title.



Posted by saints5021
Louisiana
Member since Jul 2010
17472 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 8:26 am to
You announce it because now you have the Dems fighting another actual law
Posted by BamaFan365
Member since Sep 2011
2347 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 9:28 am to
quote:

You announce it because now you have the Dems fighting another actual law

That Pelosi and Schumer both voted for
Posted by GeneralLee
Member since Aug 2004
13104 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 9:58 am to
Your argument assumes that the judge would make a logical decision based on facts. Liberal, TDS affected judges do not concern themselves with such constraints.
Posted by Suck Out West
Phoenix, AZ
Member since Dec 2006
5932 posts
Posted on 7/23/19 at 11:00 am to
So from how I read 8 U.S. Code §?1158 for Asylum, they don't have to show up at a port of entry. They can show up anywhere in the US. Even if they cross in illegally.

This law needs to be fixed.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram