- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump: Sidney Powell was never my attorney
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:36 pm to TigerDoc
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:36 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
The language in the text is "coconspirator". Perhaps our internet judge will allow me to use that for the purposes of the internet courtroom?
quote:
Do you know how easy it is to get an indictment. Can you imagine how little evidence of involvement there must be for someone to not be indicted? It’s a made up phrase so prosecutors can imply some wrongdoing, and useless idiots will use it to confirm their own bias. If you have a “unindocted co-conspirator” the evidence was so weak they wouldn’t true bill. That should tell you something. You can true bill a ham sandwich. Now that you know this I am positive you will ignore it and continue to post as if an indicted co-conspirator is something bad instead of someone they couldn’t indict. Which is really hard to do.
1
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:36 pm to Flats
Don’t forget the headaches.
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:39 pm to BBONDS25
YOU GOT NOTHING ON ME, COPPER! 
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:45 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
YOU GOT NOTHING ON ME, COPPER!
See. I told you that you would completely ignore the fact the prosecutor couldn’t even get an indictment (which is really really easy to do) and just assume guilt. Bias confirmation at its finest. You’re the useful idiot the left depends upon.
I don’t know why you have such a huge blind spot when it comes to Trump, but you’re a smart man that is very very dumb when it comes to this stuff. It’s so strange.
I mean. It’s really easy to get an indictment. Really really easy. Yet here you are assuming guilt even when they couldn’t get an indictment. It’s really bizarre.
Posted on 10/23/23 at 1:49 pm to TigerDoc
quote:
Why is it relevant if she's personally on record representing him?
For the GA case, Trump would need to be part of the conspiracy to be convicted. If Wood, Penrose, Flynn, and Powell are acting on their own, he’s not part of the Shenanigans that Powell admitted.
The Tomotely group likely has GBI evidence that will be used. See New Yorker. I don’t think Trumps tweets go that far and his separation from the issue would bolster his defense
Posted on 10/23/23 at 2:08 pm to dukkbill
Good post and good article - recommend it to all.
Page 8 of 8
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News