Started By
Message

re: Trump provides 9th with a list of those attempt terroist attacks from 7 nations

Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:13 pm to
Posted by 31TIGERS
Mike’s habitat
Member since Dec 2004
7219 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

mmcgrath


Have you housed any of those savages in your own home in the past? If you say yes, you're a liar. If you say no, why haven't you?

Do you plan on housing any of those savages in your own home in the future? If you say yes, you're a liar. If you say no, please elaborate why not.

I'll await your reply.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:13 pm to
quote:

that one is going to sting




Absolutely, the SJW crying about our translators not getting in quickly enough just received a gut punch.
Posted by idlewatcher
County Jail
Member since Jan 2012
79071 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:13 pm to
Networks scrambling to find an excuse why it wasn't reported.

Thanks for the pics brah
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:14 pm to
So what are you suggesting the court has the expertise to ascertain if the vetting process is effective. After all we are talking about a temporary stop not freshness of attempts.
Posted by Sid in Lakeshore
Member since Oct 2008
41956 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:14 pm to
quote:

The proper response would be a handful of cases that mostly (if not all) occurred between 5 and 10 years ago. No real emergency, and only 2 countries are mentioned. In the case of 3 of the guys from Somalia (same case) the group they were funding was declared a terrorist organization a month before tsent they sent the money in 2008.



Is this the entire list?
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:19 pm to
Apparently it isn't some have classified issues?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Is this the entire list?
It appears to be, at least so far. Exactly 1 has been convicted of a plot for violence in the US. Everyone else wanted to support fighting overseas or were trying to leave the country to fight there.
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:22 pm to
So, trying to prevent what is happening in other countries is a bad thing?
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35391 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

So what are you suggesting the court has the expertise to ascertain if the vetting process is effective. After all we are talking about a temporary stop not freshness of attempts.
Trump is claiming that there is an immediate emergency that could cause harm if travel visas continue for a few weeks. Submitting cases of people who were children when they came here 20-30 years ago doesn't fit that, not to mention that only 1 wanted to cause harm here.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:25 pm to
Proves the vetting process is suspect.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422412 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

It appears to be, at least so far.

i believe these are the only cases suitable for public consumption

i guaran-fricking-tee you there are numerous cells being investigated at this moment and it's not like the feds are going to announce to the world they're investigating these people in a publci document
Posted by Janky
Team Primo
Member since Jun 2011
35957 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:27 pm to
So, the rational is that unless they are coming to blow shite up in the next two weeks then it is not an issue?
Posted by MrLarson
Member since Oct 2014
34984 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Submitting cases of people who were children when they came here 20-30 years ago doesn't fit that, not to mention that only 1 wanted to cause harm here.


So you want us to be a safe haven for terrorists? Spin it man spin it.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73439 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:28 pm to
Apparently so.
Posted by LosLobos111
Austere
Member since Feb 2011
45385 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:28 pm to
The msm fell for the trap

Posted by USMCTiger03
Member since Sep 2007
71176 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

The judiciary is not qualified to determine valid terror threats.

Yes, none of this matters or should matter. It's not germane to the issue.
Posted by Scoop
RIP Scoop
Member since Sep 2005
44583 posts
Posted on 2/8/17 at 3:47 pm to
Since all of the cases posted above were adjudicated in open court, they are ok to release for public consumption.

Others submitted likely were not.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram