- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump promoting a 50 year mortgage. Dave Ramsey will lose his mind. Terrible idea - imo
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:15 pm to AncientTiger
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:15 pm to AncientTiger
Turrible.
But unsurprising.
But unsurprising.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:22 pm to the808bass
Why is it terrible?
Everyone complains about affordability. A solution is presented then everyone complains about it
This is why conservatives always lose
Everyone complains about affordability. A solution is presented then everyone complains about it
This is why conservatives always lose
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:24 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Everyone complains about affordability. A solution is presented then everyone complains about it
People are complaining about affordability to own the home, not the monthly payment like we're doing a four square at a car dealership.
Conceptualizing this argument in terms of monthly payment is a lower-level way of discussing the issue.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
People are complaining about affordability to own the home, not the monthly payment
So the monthly payment doesnt factor inro affordability?
This is like you trying to tell everyone that values wont go up over time
Then you show are chart that shows that they always do
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:42 pm to Demonbengal
quote:
No. Will make home prices go up even more.

Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:42 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
So the monthly payment doesnt factor inro affordability?
Literally covered in my post
quote:
Conceptualizing this argument in terms of monthly payment is a lower-level way of discussing the issue.
quote:
This is like you trying to tell everyone that values wont go up over time
Again, you are mis-quoting me.
quote:
The question is what happens when houses aren't appreciating assets anymore (for a sizeable amount of time, not in perpetuity obviously)
You're specifically ignoring what I actually said and just making shite up, as you're known to do.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 1:52 pm to SDVTiger
quote:Hell yeah it does!
So the monthly payment doesnt factor inro affordability?
quote:Shamelessly stolen from: LINK
Buyers: "How much will this house cost me?"
Sellers: "What's your budget?"
Buyers: "Well, it was 500K, but with these new fifty year mortgages, I think it could stretch to million."
Sellers: "I have an astonishing coincidence to report."
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:02 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
A solution is presented then everyone complains about it
Just because it's a solution doesn't mean it's not a stupid solution. You cannot honestly and with a straight face think that a 50 year mortgage is a good idea. You just can't.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Literally covered in my post
No we are talking about affordibility to buy homes which the only thing ppl care about is the payment. You are literally not talking about that and trying to seem smart
You along with many others are the ones making up nonsense. You proved that by burning yiurself with your own appreciation chart
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:06 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Just because it's a solution doesn't mean it's not a stupid solution. You cannot honestly and with a straight face think that a 50 year mortgage is a good idea. You just can't.
Umm yeah i can. Its no different than a 30yr. You and everyone cannot give any reason why its not a good idea other than values will go up
Thats it. Oh and muh interest. And you are the ones claiming someone will sit in a loan for 50yrs making the same payment
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:07 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
No we are talking about affordibility to buy homes which the only thing ppl care about is the payment.
That's a pivot, and I already covered that
quote:
People are complaining about affordability to own the home, not the monthly payment like we're doing a four square at a car dealership.
quote:
You are literally not talking about that and trying to seem smart
I specifically covered that (see above)
quote:
You proved that by burning yiurself with your own appreciation chart
Again, you're just making shite up.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:09 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
And you are the ones claiming someone will sit in a loan for 50yrs making the same payment
Because most of them will. Or they'll sell and get another 50 year mortgage. Very few will get a 50 yr mortgage, double up on payments and pay it off in 10 years or whatever.
They may as well just rent.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:12 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
Because most of them will
This is why no one can take you serious
quote:
Or they'll sell and get another 50 year mortgage
Like they do with a 30yr
quote:
They may as well just rent.
This is genius advice
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:12 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
They may as well just rent.
Assuming rents don't get wonky and expensive in an outlier way (which is typically only temporary over a much shorter period than 50 years), the 50-year mortgage becomes clearly the riskier bet. You're giving up whatever the down payment is (and its appreciation over 50 years), all maintenance/repair/insurance costs (and the massive risk), and if RE prices decline, then you save on rent.
If you need a 50-year mortgage, you can't actually afford the house.
This post was edited on 11/9/25 at 2:13 pm
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:13 pm to AncientTiger
1- It’s a far more workable solution than rent control
2-it’s a hedge against increasing rent, which is the biggest problem facing young people
3-it’s an appreciating asset so the equity in it will naturally also increase even if they’re making minimum payments
4-nothing prevents anyone from paying early
5-increases stability in communities
6-it creates a heritable asset
7-I’d much rather see someone finance a house for fifty years than rent a house till they’re fifty.
8-it’s feasible if there were age limits, and down payment requirements for qualifying
9-creates greater demand, and thus increases existing home value without flooding market with cheap supply
10-nothing prevents anyone from purchasing 15/20/30 yr mortgages
2-it’s a hedge against increasing rent, which is the biggest problem facing young people
3-it’s an appreciating asset so the equity in it will naturally also increase even if they’re making minimum payments
4-nothing prevents anyone from paying early
5-increases stability in communities
6-it creates a heritable asset
7-I’d much rather see someone finance a house for fifty years than rent a house till they’re fifty.
8-it’s feasible if there were age limits, and down payment requirements for qualifying
9-creates greater demand, and thus increases existing home value without flooding market with cheap supply
10-nothing prevents anyone from purchasing 15/20/30 yr mortgages
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
If you need a 50-year mortgage, you can't actually afford the house
Then this also applies to a 30yr fix
So in other words no one should but a home according to our Real Estate Expert
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:15 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
Then this also applies to a 30yr fix
Again, you're just making shite up. The fact that you make shite up confidently doesn't affect its legitimacy.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:19 pm to Wednesday
All very good points, Wednesday.
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Again, you're just making shite up
Please breakdown how im making shite up?
You just say that when you get caught looking like a fool
Posted on 11/9/25 at 2:20 pm to MemphisGuy
quote:
All very good points, Wednesday.
But its a terrible idea!!!
Popular
Back to top



1







