- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump orders creation of US sovereign wealth fund, says it could own part of TikTok
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:34 pm to BayouBlitz
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:34 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:Why would you be OK with one and not the other?
lending
Is not owning
Also, many types of loans come with equity participation. So, very commonly, lending IS owning.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:37 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Also, many types of loans come with equity participation. So, very commonly, lending IS owning.
Lending probably gives us rights like ownership, without having ownership.. ie how the data is farmed from customers.. who has access to the data, etc.. and the ultimate goal is to keep it out of China's hands.. so that's probably why we would be willing to finance the sale
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:39 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
Also, many types of loans come with equity participation. So, very commonly, lending IS owning.
But that's not what we're discussing.
quote:
Why would you be OK with one and not the other?
Ownership involves decision making and an obligation to stakeholders to make money in a competitive private market. What could possibly go wrong?
Keep pumping up socialism.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:42 pm to finchmeister08

That's a big nope for me.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 3:44 pm to BayouBlitz
quote:Passive warrant upside is quite common. That is - non-voting stakes NOT involved in decision making.
Ownership involves decision making and an obligation to stakeholders to make money in a competitive private market. What could possibly go wrong?
quote:Sure it is. Why should the taxpayers' return on its capital be limited to simple interest? At the very least, A LOT more interest should be charged.
But that's not what we're discussing.
Posted on 2/3/25 at 5:20 pm to scottydoesntknow
quote:Ban bet? I have a “Thank you for your generous support of our campaign” letter from President Trump that I can post.
Doubtful

quote:So opposing socialism creeping into our federal government is garbage opinions? Dumbass Gump…
your TDS garbage opinions

Posted on 2/3/25 at 10:38 pm to finchmeister08
Posted on 2/4/25 at 5:31 am to finchmeister08
I feel like this goes into the “inject yourself with bleach to cure COVID” bucket of stupidest ideas that have come out of DJT’s mouth
Popular
Back to top
